Vague definitional descriptors of the Coaching Alliance Common Factor measurement threaten construct validity in coaching research. Further, differing coach and client perceptions of the helping relationship, and coaching and therapeutic client dissimilarities compound the risk. Ten clients representing a global leadership coaching practice identified and prioritized the most helpful Client Characteristics, Coach Qualities, and Client/Coach Relationship during the program. Following, the respondents operationally defined the prioritized descriptors during an interview. Client multi-dimensional meanings, descriptors unique to coaching, and the importance of relationship bonding separated from and related to the work findings in the case study reinforced research's call for definitional clarification and a distinct coaching model and instrument.
AllenJ. (2014). Beyond the therapeutic alliance. Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 1(4), 263–265.
2.
AssayT. P., & LambertM. J. (1999). The empirical case for the common factors in therapy: quantitative findings. In HubbleM. A., DuncanB. L., & MillerS. D. (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 33–56). Washington D.C: APA Press.
3.
BachkirovaT. (2007). ‘Role of coaching psychology’ in Defining Boundaries Between Counseling and Coaching. In PalmerS., & WhybrowA. (Eds.), Handbook of coaching psychology. Routledge: London.
4.
BaldwinS. A., WampoldB. E., ImelZ. E. (2007). Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: Exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 842–852.
5.
BaronL. & MorinL. (2010). The impact of executive coaching on self-efficacy related to management skills. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 31, 18–38.
6.
BaronL. & MorinL. (2012). The working alliance in executive coaching: It's impact on outcomes and how coaches can influence it. In de HaanE. & SillsC. (Eds.), Coaching relationships (213–226).
7.
BediDavis, & Arvay. (2005). The client's perspective on forming a counseling alliance and implications for research on counselor training. Canadian Journal of Consulting, 39, 71–85.
8.
BlowA. J. & SprenkleD. H. (2001). Common factors across theories of marriage and family therapy: A modified Delphi study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27(3), 385–401.
9.
BordinE. S. (1976). The generalization of the psychoanalytical concept of working alliances. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16, 252–260.
10.
BordinE. S. (1994). Theory and Research on the therapeutic working alliance: New directions. In HorvathA. O. & GreenburgL. S. (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley.
11.
BoyceL. A., JacksonR. J. & NealL. J. (2010). Building successful leadership coaching relationships: Examining impact of matching criteria in a leadership coaching programme. Journal of Management Development, 29, 914–931.
12.
BozerG. & SarrosJ. C. (2012). Examining the effectiveness of Executive Coaching on coachees’ performance in the Israeli context. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 10, 14–32.
13.
BozerG., SarrosJ.C., & SantoraJ. C. (2014). Academic background and credibility in executive coaching effectiveness. Personnel Review, 43(6), 881–897.
Campbell QuickJ. & Macik-FreyM. (2004). Coaching through deep interpersonal communication. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research. 56(2), 67–74. http:dx.doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.56.2.67
16.
CooperM. (2008). Essential Research Findings in Counseling & Psychotherapy: The facts are friendly. London: Sage.
17.
DagleyG. R. (2010). Exceptional executive coaches: Practices and attributes. International Coaching Psychology Review, 5, 63–80.
18.
DeciE. L. & RyanR. M. (2012). Self-Determination theory. In Van LangueP. A. M., KruglanskiA. W., & HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, 1, (pp. 416–437). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
de HaanE., CulpinV. & CurdJ. (2011). Executive coaching in practice: What determines helpfulness for clients of coaching?Personnel Review, 40, 24–44.
20.
de HaanE., DuckworthA., BirchD. and JonesC. (2012). The coaching relationship and other ‘common factors’ in executive coaching outcome. In Coaching relationships: The relational coaching field book. de HaanE. and SillsC. (Eds.) Chapter 13, (pp. 185–196). United Kingdom: Libri Publishing.
21.
de HaanE. & DuckworthA. (2012). Signaling a new trend in executive coaching outcome research. International Coaching Psychology Review, 8, 6–19.
22.
de HaanE. & NießC. (2012). Critical moments in a coaching case study: Illustration of a process research model. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice & Research, 64(3), 198–224.
23.
de HaanE., DuckworthA., BirchD. and JonesC. (2013). Executive coaching outcome research: the predictive value of common factors such as relationship, personality match, and self-efficacy. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 65(1), 40–57.
24.
de HaanE. & PageN. (2013). Outcome report: conversations are key to results. Coaching at Work, 8, July/August, 10–13.
25.
DwyerS. C. & BuckleJ. L. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63.
26.
EversW. J. G., BrouwersA. & TomicW. (2006). A quasi-experimental study on management coaching effectiveness. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 58, 174–182.
27.
FlyvbjergB. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
28.
ForzaC. (2002). Survey research in operations management: a process-based perspective. International journal of operations & production management,22(2), 152–194.
29.
GlesneC. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
30.
GonzalezA.L. (2004). Transforming conversations: Executive coaches and business leaders in dialogical collaboration for growth. Dissertation Abstract International Section A. Humanities and Social Science. 65, 1023.
31.
GrantA.M., PassmoreJ., CavanaughM. & ParkerH. (2010). The state of play in coaching today. In HodgkinsonG. P. & FordJ. K. (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, (pp. 125–167). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
32.
GrencavageL. M. & NorcrossJ. C. (1990). Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors?Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 372–378.
33.
HatcherR. L. & BarendsA. W. (2006). Patients’ views of the alliance in psychotherapy: Exploratory factor analysis of three alliance measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1326–1336.
34.
HauserM. & HaysD. G. (2010). The slaying of a beautiful hypothesis: The efficacy of counseling and the therapeutic process. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education, and Development, 49.
35.
HorvathA. O. & GreenbergL. S. (1986). Development of the Working Alliance Inventory. In GreenbergL. S. & PinsofW. M. (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic research process: A research handbook. (pp. 529–556). New York: Guilford Press.
36.
HorvathA. O. & LuborskiL. (1993). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4, 561–573.
37.
HorvathA. O. & BediR. P. (2002). The alliance. In NorcrossJ. C. (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (pp. 37–69). New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
HorvathA. O., TapiaL., and SymondsD. B. (2010). The alliance in couple therapy: The web of relationships. In MuranJ. C. & BarberJ. P. (Eds.), The therapeutic alliance: An evidence-based approach to practice, pp.201–239. New York: Guilford.
39.
IaniroP. M. & KaufeldS. (2014). Take care what you bring with you: How coaches’ mood and interpersonal behavior affect coaching success. Coaching Psychological Journal: Practice & Research. 66(3), 231–257.
40.
JooB. K. (2005). Executive coaching: A conceptual framework from an integrative review of practice and research. Human Resource Development Review, 4(4), 462–488.
41.
JowettS. (2007). Interdependence analysis and the 3+1Cs in the coach-athlete relationship. In JowetteS. and LavalleeD. (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 15–77). New York, NY: Routledge.
42.
Jowett & Cockerill. (2003). Olympic medalists’ perspective of the athlete-coach relationship. Psychology of Sport and Expertise, 4, 313–331.
43.
JowettS., KanakoglouK., & PassmoreJ. (2012). The application of the 3+1Cs relationship model in Executive Coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research. 64, 183–197. doi:10.1037/a0030316.
KielF., RimmerE., WilliamsK. & DoyleM. (1996). Coaching at the top. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice & Research. 48(2), 67–77.
46.
KieslerD. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research. New York: Wiley.
47.
KilburgR. R. (1996). Toward a conceptual understanding and definition of executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice & Research. 48(2), 134–144.
48.
KilburgR. R. (2001). Facilitating intervention adherence in executive coaching: a model and methods, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53, 251–267.
49.
KrauseM., AltimirC. & HorvathA. (2011). Deconstructing the therapeutic alliance: Reflections on the underlying dimensions of the concept. Clinica Y Salud (Clinic and Health), 22(3), 267–283.
50.
KvaleS. (1995). The social construction of validity. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 19–50.
51.
LambertM.J. (1989). The individual therapist's contribution to psychotherapy process and outcome. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 469–485.
52.
LambertM. J. & BarleyD. E. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcomes. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38, 357–361.
53.
LampropoulosG. K. (2000). Definitional and research issues in the common factor approach to psychotherapy integration: Misconceptions, clarifications, and proposals. Psychotherapy Integration, 10, 415–438.
54.
LeeG. (2003). Leadership Coaching. CIPD: London.
55.
LeedyP.D. & OrmondJ.E. (2015). Practical Research and Planning. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56.
LowmanR. (2012). The scientist-practitioner consulting psychologist. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research. 64(3). 151–156.
57.
LuborskyL. (1976). Helping alliances in psychotherapy. In CleghornJ. L. (Ed.), Successful psychotherapy (pp.92–116). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
58.
LuborskyL., BarberJ. P., SiquelandL., JohnsonS., NajavitsL. M., FrankA., DaleyD. (1996). The revised helping alliance questionnaire (HAq-II). The Journal of Psycho-therapy practice and research, 5, 260–271.
59.
MachinB. (2010). The nature of the internal coaching relationship. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 4, October 2010, 37–52.
60.
MarmarC., WeissD.S. & GastonL. (1989). Toward the validation of the California Therapeutic Alliance Rating System. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1, 46–52.
61.
MartinD. J., GarskeM. P. & DavisM. K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables. A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting Psychology. 68, 438–450.
62.
McKennaD. D. & DavisS. L. (2009a). What is the active ingredient equation for success in executive coaching. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 297–304.
63.
McKennaD. D. & DavisS. L. (2009b). Hidden in plain sight: The active ingredients of executive coaching. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 244–46.
64.
McAleavyA. A. & CastonguayL. G. (2014). The process of change in psychotherapy: common and unique factors. Psychotherapy Research, doi:10.1007/978-3-709115, 1382–0_15, Springer-Verlan Wien.
65.
MelitoR. (2006). Integrating individual and family therapies: A Structural-Developmental Approach. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 16, 346–381.
66.
MoenF. & SkaalvikE. (2009). The effect from Executive Coaching on performance psychology. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 7, 31–49.
67.
O'BroinA. & PalmerS. (2007) Re-appraising the coach-client relationship: The unassuming change agent is coaching. In PalmerS., & WybrowA. (Eds.) Handbook of coaching psychology: A guide of practioners. London, UK: Routledge.
68.
O'BroinA. & PalmerS. (2009). Co-creating an optimal coaching alliance. International Coaching Psychology Review, 4, 184–194.
69.
O'BroinA. & PalmerS. (2010). The coaching alliance as a universal concept spanning conceptual approaches. Coaching Psychology International, 3, (3) 3–6.
70.
PargamentK. I., LomaxJ. W., McGeeJ. S.& FangQ. (2014). Sacred moments in psychotherapy from the perspectives of mental health providers and clients: Prevalence, predictors, and consequences. Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 1, 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/scp0000043
71.
PassmoreJ. (2008). The character of the workplace coaching: The implications for coaching training and practice. Stratford: University of East London.
72.
PassmoreJ. & Fillery-TravisA. (2011). A critical review of executive coaching research: a decade of progress and what's to come. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 4(2), 70–88. doi:10.1080/17521882.2011.596484
73.
PattonM. Q. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
74.
ProchaskaJ. O. & NorcrossJ. C. (2007). Systems of psychotherapy: A transtheoretical analysis. (6th ed.) Australia: Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
75.
RoeseN. J. & VohsK. D. (2012). Hindsight Bias. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 7, 411–426.
76.
RogersC. R. (1992). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 827–832.
77.
RyanR. M. & DeciE. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
78.
SchermulyC. C. & SchollW. (2012). Discussion Coding System (DCS). A new instrument analyzing communication processes. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 12–40. doi:10.1080/19312458.2011.651346
79.
SmithI. M., BornemanM. J., BrummelB. J. & ConnellyB. S. (2009). The criterion problem in executive coaching. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives in Science and Practice, 2, 288–292.
80.
SmitherJ. W. (2011). Can psychotherapy serve as a guide for research about executive coaching? An agenda for the next decade. Journal of Business Psychology, 26, 135–145.
81.
StewartL. J., PalmerS., WilkinH. & KerrinM. (2008). The influence of character: Does personality impact coaching success. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring. 6(1), 32–43.
82.
Sue-ChanC. & LathamG. P. (2004). The relative effectiveness of external, peer, and self-coaches. Applied Psychology: An international review. 53(2), 260–278.
83.
TaylorS. J. & BogdonR. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
84.
TraceyT. J., LichentenbergJ. W., GoodyearR. K., ClaibornC. D. & WampoldB. E. (2003). Concept mapping of therapeutic common factors. Psychotherapy Research, 13, 401–413.
85.
WampoldB. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
86.
WestL. & MilanM. (2001). The reflecting glass: Professional coaching for leadership development, (p. 74). New York: Pelgrave-McMillan.
87.
WhitworthL., Kimsey-HouseH. & SyndahlP. (1998). Co-active coaching: new skills for coaching people toward success in work and life. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
88.
YinR. K. (1994). Case study research. Design and methods. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
89.
ZellerR.A. & CarminesE. G. (1980). Measurement in social science: The link between theory and data. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, England.
