This paper examines the influence of managers’ personal time perspectives on perceived peer coaching effectiveness. Relatively little research has been done on peer coaching in business environments and on how to incorporate personal time perspectives into peer coaching settings. This paper investigates the compatibility of different time perspectives within peer coaching relationships. Mixed method research was undertaken with 42 engineers in management positions in Germany at four interventions. The paper provides empirical evidence that perceived peer coaching effectiveness varies significantly with the combinations of the matched coaches’ and coachees’ preferred time perspectives. It also highlights the importance of meaning and proficiency, and raise questions for further research on perceived peer coaching effectiveness.
AllenT.D., LentzE., & DayR. (2006). Career success outcomes associated with mentoring others. A comparison of mentors and nonmentors. Journal of Career Development, 32, 272–285.
2.
BarS. (2012). How personal systems coaching increases self-efficacy and well-being for Israeli single mothers. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 12(2), 59–74.
3.
BaronL., & MorinL. (2009). The coach-client relationship in executive coaching: A field study. Human Resource Development Review, 20(1), 85–106.
BoniwellI. (2005). Beyond time management: How the latest research on time perspective and perceived time use can assist clients with time-related concerns. International Journal of Evidence based Coaching and Mentoring, 3(2), 61–74.
6.
BoniwellI., OsinE., & SircovaA. (2014). Achieving balance in time perspective: Coaching methods. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 12(2), 14–40.
7.
BoniwellI., & ZimbardoP. G. (2004). Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. In LinleyP.A. & JosephS. (Eds.) Positive Psychology in Practice, New Jersey: John Wiley.
8.
BrewerJ., & HunterA. (1989). Multi-Method Research A Synthesis of Styles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
CorleyK. G., & GioiaD. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administration Science Quarterly, 49, 173–208.
11.
CoxE., & PatrickE. (2012). Managing emotions at work: How coaching affects retail support workers’ performance and motivation. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 10(2), 34–51.
12.
CoxE., BachkirovaT., & ClutterbuckD. (Eds.). (2010). The complete handbook of coaching. London: Sage.
13.
CoxE. (2003). The contextual imperative: Implications for coaching and mentoring. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 1(1), 9–22.
14.
D'AlessioM., GuarinoA., De PascalisV., & ZimbardoP. G. (2003). Testing Zimbardo's Stanford Time Perspective Inventory (STPI) - short form: An Italian study. Time and Society, 12, 333–347.
15.
DawdyG.N. (2004). Executive coaching: A comparative design exploring the perceived effectiveness of coaching and methods. Dissertation Abstract International Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 65(5-B), 2674.
16.
DeciE.L., KoestnerR., & RyanR.M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.
17.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (1998). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. London: Sage Publications.
18.
De HaanE., DuckworthA., BirchD., & JonesC. (2013). Executive coaching outcome research: The contribution of common factors such as relationship, personality match, and self-efficacy. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 65(1), 40–57.
19.
EarleyP. C., & MosakowskiE. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 26–49.
20.
EllingerA.D., HamlinR.G., & BeattieR.S. (2008). Behavioural indicators of ineffective managerial coaching: A cross national study. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32(4), 240–302.
21.
ElyK., & ZaccaroS. J. (2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of coaching - A focus on stakeholders, criteria, and data collection methods. In Hernez-BroomeG. & BoyceL. A. (Eds.), Advancing executive coaching - Setting the course for successful leadership coaching (pp. 319–349). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
GibsonC., WallnerM., MasonA., & ConteJ. (2007). Antecedents, consequences, and moderators of time perspective heterogeneity for knowledge management in MNO teams. Journal of organisational Behavior, 28, 1005–1034.
23.
GhorobA., VivasM., De VoreD., NgoV., BodenheimerT., ChenE., & ThomD. (2011). The effectiveness of peer health coaching in improving glycemic control among low-income patients with diabetes: protocol for a randomized controlled trial, BMC Public Health, 11, 208.
HackmanJ.G., & WagemanR. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269–287.
26.
HammersleyM., & AtkinsonP. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
27.
JarvisJ. (2004): Buying Coaching Services: A Guide. London: CIPD.
28.
JohnsonD. W., & JohnsonR. T. (1978). Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 12(1), 3–15.
29.
JonesJ. M. (1988). Cultural differences in temporal perspectives. In McGrathJ. E. (Ed.), The social psychology of time: New perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
JunkerB.H. (2004). The Field Work Situation, Social Roles for Observation. In. SealeC. (ed.) Social Research Methods, A Reader. London: Routledge; 221–225.
31.
KilburgR.R (2000). Executive coaching: Developing managerial wisdom in a world of chaos. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32.
KolesvosA. (2009). Factorial validity of the Latvian and Russian versions of Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory in Latvia. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 10, 55–64.
33.
LadyshewskyR. (2010). Peer coaching. In CoxE., BachkirovaT. and ClutterbuckD. (eds), The complete handbook of coaching (pp. 284–296). London: Sage.
34.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers. CartwrightD. (ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
35.
LockeK. (1996). Rewriting ‘The Discovery of Grounded Theory’ after 25 years. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 239–245.
36.
LokeA.J.T., & ChowF.L.W. (2007). Learning partnership e the experience of peer tutoring among nursing students: a qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies44, 237–244.
37.
MarquardtM. J., & HorvathL. (2001). Global teams: How top multinationals span boundaries and cultures with high-speed teamwork. NY: Davies-Black Publishing.
38.
NuttinJ.R., & LensW. (1985). Future time perspective and motivation, theory and research method. Leuven, Hillsdale, NJ: Leuven University Press. Erlbaum.
39.
PassmoreJ., & Fillery-TravisA. (2011). A critical review of executive coaching research: a decade of progress and what's to come. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice4(2), 70–88.
40.
RothE. M., MulterJ., & RaslearT. (2006). Shared situation awareness as a contributor to high reliability performance in railroad operations. Organization Studies, 27(7), 967–987.
41.
SchmidtJ., & WernerC. (2007). Designing online instruction for success: future oriented motivation and self-regulation. The Electronic Journal of e-learning, 5(1), 69–78.
42.
SchmidtT. (2003). Coaching: Eine empirische Studie zu Erfolgsfaktoren bei Einzel-Coaching. (Coaching: An empirical study of success factors in individual coaching), Berlin.
43.
SircovaA., VijverVan De, OsinE., MilfontT.L., FieulaineN., KislaliA., & ZimbardoP.G. (2011). & 50 members of the international time perspective research project (2011, September). Cross-Cultural Assessment of Time Perspective: Equivalence and Bias Study. Paper presented at 11th European Conference on Psychological Assessment, Riga, Latvia. Accessed June 2, 2011 from http://www.ecpa11.lu.lv/files/Sircova.pdf
WallerM. J., ConteJ. M., GibsonC. B., & CarpenterM. A. (2001). The effect of individual perceptions of deadlines on team performance. Academy of Management Review, 26, 586–600.
YuklG. A., GordonA., & TaberT. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9, 15–32.
51.
ZimbardoP., & BoydJ. (2008). The time paradox: the new psychology of time that will change your life. New York. NY: Free Press.
52.
ZimbardoP., & BoydJ. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.
