There appears to be a gap between the behaviours of leaders and the expectations of followers and other stakeholders. This gap may be due to an absence of brave leadership. An action research study was designed for use with six leaders who undertook to help evolve and also be coached using a brave leadership coaching model. The data was analysed using a retroductive and thematic approach. The use of the brave leadership model appears to indicate that it can assist in decision making and that bravery may be enhanced, at least from a subjective perspective. It would also appear that the idea of brave leadership may complement other leadership theories.
BarghJ.A., GollwitzerP.M., Lee-ChaiA., BarndollarK. & TroetschelR. (2001). The automated will: Unconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1004–1027.
2.
BarlingJ., LoughlinC. & KellowayE.K. (2002). Development and Test of a Model Linking Safety-Specific Transformational Leadership and Occupational Safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 488–496.
3.
BaumF.E., MacDougallC. & SmithD. (2006). Participatory action research glossary. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(10), 854–857.
4.
BoyatzisR. & AkrivouK. (2006). The ideal self as the driver of intentional change. Journal of Management Development, 25(7), 624–642.
5.
BurkeR.J. (2006). Why leaders fail: Exploring the dark side. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 91–100.
6.
ChesbroughH.W. & GarmanA.R. (2009). How open innovation can help you cope in lean times. Harvard Business Review, 87, 68–76.
7.
CiullaJ.B. (2004). Ethics, the heart of leadership (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.
8.
GarrattB. (2011). The fish rots from the head: The crisis in our boardrooms: Developing the competent skills of the director (Rev. ed.). London: Profile Books.
9.
GreenleafR.K. (1977). Servant-leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
10.
HatchJ.A. (2002). Doing qualitative Research in Education Settings. New York: State University of New York Press.
11.
HersheyP. & BlanchardK. (1977). Management of organizational behaviour: Utilising Human Resources (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
Human Givens Institute (HGI) (2006). Human Givens emotional needs audit. Retrieved from: http://www.hgi.org.uk/ena/
13.
KauffmanC. (2006). Positive Psychology: The Science at the Heart of Coaching. In: StoberD. & GrantA.M. (Eds.), Evidence Based Coaching Handbook. New York: Wiley.
14.
LevyB.R. (2003). Mind matters: Cognitive and physical effects of aging self-stereotypes. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 58, 203–211.
McKayJ. & MarshallP. (2001). The dual imperatives of action research. Information Technology and People, 14, 46–59.
17.
MingersJ. (2003). The Place of Statistical Modelling in Management Science: Critical Realism and Multimethodology, Working Paper Series No. 45. Canterbury: Canterbury Business School.
18.
PetersonC. & SeligmanM.E.P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and Classification. New York: Oxford, Oxford University Press.
19.
RogersC.R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In: KochS. (Ed.), Psychology: a study of a science, Vol. III. Formulations of the person and the social context (pp.184–256). New York: McGraw Hill.
Uhl-BienM. (2006). Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654–676.
22.
WongC. & CummingsG. (2009). Authentic leadership: A new theory for nursing or back to basics?Journal of Health Organization and Management, 23(5), 522–538.
