This study analysed the 2009/10 formal teacher-pupil mentoring scheme at Blackwater Community School (BCS), Lismore, Co. Waterford in the Republic of Ireland. Twenty three teachers voluntarily mentored 220 pupils sitting state examinations as part of the scheme, which was monitored by two mentoring coordinators. Benefits and drawbacks of the scheme are discussed under the topics of quality in the mentoring relationship, organisation and perceived impact of the scheme. It was found that the most beneficial outcome of the scheme was the development of positive relationships between teachers and pupils involved.
AllenT. D., & EbyL. T. (2008). Mentoring commitment in formal mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 72, 309–316.
2.
AllenT. D., EbyL. T., & LentzE. (2006). The relationship between formal mentoring programme characteristics and perceived programme effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 59, 125–153.
3.
AndrewsM., & ChiltonF. (2000). Students and mentor perceptions of mentoring effectiveness. Nurse Education Today, 20, 555–562.
4.
ArmstrongS., AllinsonC., & HayesJ. (2002). Formal mentoring systems: An examination of the effects of mentor/protégé congitive styles on the mentoring process. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 1111–1137.
5.
BaranikL. E., RolingE. A., & EbyL. T. (2009). Why does mentoring work? The role of perceived organisational support. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 76(3), 239–250.
6.
BeattieA., & HoldenR. (1994). Young person mentoring in schools: The Doncaster Experience. Education and Training, 33(5), 8–15.
7.
ChaoG., WalzP., & GardnerP. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Personnel Psychology, 45, 619–636.
8.
CoxE. (2005). For better, for worse: The matching process in formal mentoring schemes. Mentoring and Tutoring, 13(3), 403–414.
9.
CreswellJ. C. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. London, Sage Publications.
10.
DuboisD. L., HollowayB. E., ValentineJ. C., & CooperH. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programmes for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 157–197.
11.
DuboisD. L., & SilverthornN. (2005). Natural mentoring relationships and adolescent health: Evidence from a national study. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 518–524.
12.
EbyL. T., & LockwoodA. (2005). Protégés’ and mentors’ reactions to participating in formal mentoring programmes: A qualitiative investigation. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 67, 441–458.
13.
EganT. M., & SongZ. (2008). Are facilitated mentoring programmes beneficial? A randomized experimental field study. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 72, 351–362.
14.
FeldmanD. F. (1999). Mentor-protégé diversity and its impact on international internship experiences, Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 20, 597–611.
15.
GayB. (1994). What is mentoring?Education and Training, 36(5), 4–7.
16.
HylanI., & PostlethwaiteK. (1998). The success of teacher-pupil mentoring in raising standards of achievement. Education and Training, 40(2), 68–77.
17.
IrivingS. E., MooreD. W., & HamiltonR. J. (2003). Mentoring for high ability high school students. Education and Training, 45(2), 100–109.
18.
KielyE. (2005). The mentoring phenomenon in educating pre-service Science teachers through a school-based collaborative partnership. University of Limerick (s.n.).
19.
KramK. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
20.
Lennox TerrionJ., PhilionR., & LeonardD. (2007). An evaluation of a university peer-mentoring training programme. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 5(1), 42–57.
21.
MillerA. (1999). Business mentoring in schools: Does it raise attainment?Education and Training, 41(2), 73–78.
22.
NoeR. A., GreenbergerD. B., & WangS. (2002). Mentoring: What we know and where we might go from here. In FerrisG. R., MartocchioJ. J., Research in personnel and human resources management. Greenwich, CT: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
23.
PariseM. R., & ForretM. L. (2008). Formal mentoring programmes: The relationship of programme design and support to mentors’ perceptions of benefits and costs. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 72, 225–240.
24.
RaginsB., & CottonJ. (1991). Easier said than done: Gender differences in perceived barriers to gaining a mentor. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 939–951.
25.
RaginsB., & ScanduraT. (1994). Gender differences in expected outcomes of mentoring relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 957–971.
26.
SipeC. L. (2002). Mentoring programmes for adolescents: A research summary. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 251–260.
27.
TierneyJ. P., GrossmanJ. B., & ReschN. L. (1995). Making a difference: An impact study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
28.
WanbergC. R., WelshE. T., & HezlettS. A. (2003). Mentoring research: A review and dynamic process model. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 22, 39–124.
