Prognostic value of demographic factors,pre-test probability scoring,exercise test diagnosis,and inability to exercise in patients with recent onset suspected cardiac chest pain
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2012
Prognostic value of demographic factors,pre-test probability scoring,exercise test diagnosis,and inability to exercise in patients with recent onset suspected cardiac chest pain
Aims: To assess the prognostic value of an inconclusive exercise test or inability to exercise in patients with recent onset suspected cardiac chest pain and to determine the independent predictors of events in these patients.
Methods: This was an observational follow-up study of patients presenting to a rapid access chest pain clinic with a history of recent-onset suspected cardiac chest pain as referred by the family practitioner. The main outcome measure was a composite endpoint of death and acute coronary syndrome hospital admission.
Results: The study cohort consisted of 1851 patients in whom a total of 147 events were recorded during a mean follow-up period of 4.1 ± 1.1 years. Those with events were significantly older (65.1 ± 12.5 years versus 56.4 ± 13.2 years, p < 0.001), had higher mean pre-test probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), and had higher prevalence of diabetes (18.4% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.001), hypertension (55.8% vs. 38.7%, p < 0.001), and smoking (36.7% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.03) than those without events. These patients were also more likely to have a positive exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) (15.6% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.001) or not have a diagnostic exercise test because of an inconclusive result or inability to exercise (60.5% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.001). Cox multivariate regression analysis showed that age (hazard ratio, HR 1.03, p < 0.001), pre-test probability of CAD (HR 1.08, p = 0.04), positive exercise ECG (HR 2.94, p < 0.001), and an inconclusive test or inability to exercise (HR 3.45, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of events.
Conclusions: In patients with recent onset suspected cardiac chest pain, not having a diagnostic exercise ECG because of an inconclusive test or inability to exercise is an independent predictor of events and has similar prognostic implications to a positive exercise ECG. In addition, pre-test probability estimation at baseline is a robust indicator of clinical outcome. Future models of care need to incorporate early and increased access to non-exercise cardiac imaging techniques in order to meet the needs of this high-risk subgroup of patients.
Department of Health. The National Service Framework for coronary heart disease: Modern standards and service models. London: Department of Health, 2000.
2.
BoyleRM. Value of rapid-access chest pain clinics. Heart2007; 93(4): 415–416.
3.
ByrneJMurdochDMorrisonCMcMurrayJ. An audit of activity and outcome from a daily and a weekly ‘one stop’ rapid assessment chest pain clinic. Postgrad Med J2002; 78(915): 43–46.
4.
MantJMcManusRJOakesRADelaneyBCBartonPMDeeksJJ. Systematic review and modelling of the investigation of acute and chronic chest pain presenting in primary care. Health Technol Assess2004; 8(2): 1–158.
5.
RajpuraASethiSTaylorM. An evaluation of two Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinics in central Lancashire, UK. J Eval Clin Pract2007; 13(3): 326–336.
6.
SekhriNFederGSJunghansCHemingwayHTimmisAD. How effective are rapid access chest pain clinics? Prognosis of incident angina and non-cardiac chest pain in 8762 consecutive patients. Heart2007; 93(4): 458–463.
7.
TaylorGLMurphyNFBerryCChristieJFinlaysonAMacIntyreA. Long term outcome of low-risk patients attending a rapid access chest pain clinic. Heart2008; 94(5): 628–632.
8.
TenkorangJNFoxKFCollierTJWoodDA. A rapid access cardiology service for chest pain, heart failure and arrythmias accurately diagnoses cardiac disease and identifies patients at high risk: a prospective cohort study. Heart2006; 92(8): 1084–1090.
9.
GianrossiRDetranoRMulvihillDLehmannKDubachPColomboA. Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease ⊟ a meta-analysis. Circulation1989; 80(1): 87–98.
10.
PicanoEMolinaroSPasanisiE. The diagnostic accuracy of pharmacological stress echocardiography for the assessment of the coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Ultrasound2008; 6(June 19): 30–30.
11.
CheitlinMDArmstrongWFAurigemmaGPBellerGABiermanFZDavisJL. American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association; American Society of Echocardiography. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Revise the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Circulation2003; 108(9): 1146–1162.
12.
KlockeFJBairdMGLorellBHBatemanTMMesserJVBermanDS. American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American Society for Nuclear Cardiology. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging – executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). Circulation2003; 108(11): 1404–1418.
13.
NandalurKRDwamenaBAChoudhriAFNandalurMRCarlosRC. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol2007; 50(14): 1343–1353.
14.
HendelRCPatelMRKramerCMPoonMHendelRCCarrJC. American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group; American College of Radiology; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; North American Society for Cardiac Imaging; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Interventional Radiology. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol2006; 48(7): 1475–1497.
15.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction. NICE technology appraisal guidance 73. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, November, 2003.
16.
BoonNNorellMHallJJenningsKPennyLWilsonC. National variations in the provision of cardiac services in the United Kingdom: second report of the British Cardiac Society Working Group, 2005. Heart2006; 92(7): 873–878.
17.
DiamondGAForresterJS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med1979; 300(24): 1350–1358.
18.
SekhriNFederGSJunghansCEldridgeSUmaipalanAMadhuR. Incremental prognostic value of the exercise electrocardiogram in the initial assessment of patients with suspected angina: cohort study. Brit Med J2008; 337: a2240. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2240–a2240. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2240.
19.
SekhriNTimmisAChenRJunghansCWalshNZamanJ. Inequity of access to investigation and effect on clinical outcomes: prognostic study of coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris. Brit Med J2008; 336(May 10): 1058–1061.
20.
DalyCADe StavolaBLopez SendonJLTavazziLBoersmaEClemensF. on behalf of the Euro Heart Survey Investigators. Predicting prognosis in stable angina – results from the Euro Heart survey of stable angina: prospective observational study. Brit Med J2006; 332(7536): 262–267.
21.
SachdevMSunJLTsiatsisAANelsonCLMarkDBJollisJG. The prognostic importance of comorbidity for mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol2004; 43(4): 576–582.
22.
LaukkanenJARauramaaRKurlS. Exercise workload, coronary risk evaluation and the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause death in middle-aged men. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehab2008; 15(3): 285–292.
23.
VanhoenackerPKHeijenbrok-KalMHVanHRDecramerIVan HoeLRWijnsW. Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. Radiology2007; 244(2): 419–428.
24.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Assessment and diagnosis of recent onset chest pain or discomfort of suspected origin. NICE clinical guideline 95. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, March, 2010.
25.
MowattGCumminsEWaughNWalkerSCookJJiaX. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. Health Technol Assess2008; 12(17): 1–143.
26.
MowattGValeLBrazzelliMHernandezRMurrayAScottN. Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction. Health Technol Assess2004; 8: iii–89.
27.
SharplesLHughesVCreanADyerMBuxtonMGoldsmithKStoneD. Cost-effectiveness of functional cardiac testing in the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. The CeCaT trial. Health Technol Assess2007; 11(49): 1–115.
