Background: Owing to a reported learning effect in patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disease, performance of at least two six-minute walk tests (6MWT) are recommended as standard practice. Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) are typically elderly and frail and it is unknown whether current guidelines are practical in a clinical setting.
Aims: The aim of this study was to determine whether repeat performance of 6MWTs in patients with CHF is related to between-test interval or baseline performance.
Methods: This was a multisite observational study enrolling participants entering into heart failure rehabilitation programmes. Participants performed two 6MWTs with randomly allocated inter-test intervals between 15 and 90 minutes. Distance walked in the second test was compared with the first test using a paired t test.
Results: Eighty-eight participants (45 females, age 65 ± 14 years) with stable CHF were enrolled. Mean distance walked increased from 301 metres in test 1 to 313 metres in test 2 (p < 0.001). No significant change was recorded between test 1 and test 2 for those whose baseline distance was <300 metres. The interval between tests had no significant effect on the distance walked.
Conclusion: The change in 6MWT distance was significantly associated with better baseline performance but not with the interval between tests.
OlssonLSwedbergKClarkALWitteKKClelandGF. Six minute walk corridor test as an outcome measure for the assessment of treatment in randomized, blinded intervention trials of chronic heart failure: a systematic review. Eur Heart J2005; 26(8): 778–793.
2.
RostagnoCGensiniGF. Six minute walk test: a simple and useful test to evaluate functional capacity in patients with heart failure. Intern Emerg Med2007; 3(3): 205–212.
3.
ATS Statement: Guidelines for the six minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2002; 166: 111–117.
4.
EnrightPLSherrilDL. Reference equations for the six minute walk test in healthy adults. Am J Resp Crit Care Med1998; 158: 1384–1387.
5.
HamiltonDMHaennelRG. Validity and reliability of the 6 minute walk test in a cardiac rehab population. J Cardiopulm Rehabil2000; 20: 156–164.
6.
RostagnoCOlivoGComegioMBoddiVBanchelliMGalantiG. Prognostic value of 6-minute walk corridor test in patients with mild to moderate heart failure: comparison with other methods of functional evaluation. Eur J Heart Fail2003; 5(3): 247–252.
7.
WuGSandersonWGBittnerV. The 6 minute walk test: how important is the learning effect?Am Heart J2003; 146: 129–133.
8.
DemersCMcKelvieRSNegassaAYusufS. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the six minute walk test in patients with heart failure. Am Heart J2001; 142(4): 698–703.
9.
OpasichCPinnaGDMazzaAFeboORiccardiRRiccardiPG. Six-minute walking performance in patients with moderate to severe heart failure. is it a useful indicator in clinical practice?Eur Heart J2001; 22: 488–496.
10.
ZugckCKrugerCDurrSGerberSHHaunstetterAHornigK. Is the 6 minute walk test a reliable substitute of peak oxygen uptake in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?Eur Heart J2000; 21: 540–549.
11.
OpasichCPinnaGDMazzaAFeboORiccardiPGCapomollaS. Reproducibility of the six-minute walking test in patients with chronic heart failure. Practical implications. Am J Card1998; 81: 1497–1500.
12.
RileyMMcParlandJStanfordCFNicollsDP. Oxygen consumption during walk corridor testing in chronic cardiac failure. Eur Heart J1992; 13: 789–793.
13.
LipkinDPScrivenAJCrakeTPoole-WilsonPA. Six minute walking test for assessing exercise capacity in chronic heart failure. BMJ1986; 292: 653–655.
14.
GuyattGHSullivanMJThompsonPJFallenELPugsleySOTaylorDW. The 6 minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J1985; 132: 919–922.
15.
ThompsonRGordonNPescatelloL. ACSM’s Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription2010; 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins209–209.
16.
KervioGVilleNSLeclercqCDaubertJCCarreF. Intensity and daily reliability of the six minute walk test in moderate chronic heart failure patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85(9): 1513–1518.
17.
EiserNWillsherDDoreCJ. Reliability, repeatability and sensitivity to change of externally and self paced walking tests in COPD patients. Respir Med2003; 97(4): 407–414.
18.
DuHNewtonPJSalamonsonYCarrieri- KohlmanVLDavidsonPM. A review of the six minute walk test: its implication as a self administered assessment tool. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2009; 8(1): 2–8.
19.
BensimhonDRLeiferESEllisSJFlegJLKeteyianSJPinaIL. Reproducibility of peak oxygen uptake and other cardopulmonary exercise testing parameters in patients with heart failure (from the heart failure and a controlled trial investigating outcomes of exercise training). Am J Cardiol2008; 102(6): 712–717.
20.
KervioGVilleNSLeclercqCDaubertJCCarreF. Cardiorespiratory adaptations during the six minute walk test in chronic heart failure patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2004; 11(2): 171–177.
21.
SchunemannHJGuyattGH. Commentary – Goodbye M(C)ID! Hello MID, Where do you come from?Health Services Research2005; 40(2): 593–597.
22.
RedelmeierDABayoumiAMGoldsteinRSGuyattGH. Interpreting small differences in functional status: the six minute walk test in chronic lung disease patients. Am J Resp Care Med1997; 155(4): 1278–1282.
23.
HollandAEHillCJRasekabaTLeeANaughtonMTMcDonaldCF. updating the minimal important difference for six-minute walk distance in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2010; 91: 221–225.
