The 2008 Noida double murder of Aarushi Talwar and Hemraj Banjade can be understood as a curious amalgam of unsolvability, sensationalism, and moral polarization that defined post-millennial India. This article attempts a close reading of two Hindi films on the Aarushi-Hemraj murder case, namely Rahasya (Mystery, 2015) and Talvar (The Sword, 2015), using the insights of cultural criminology in order to understand the politics of interpretation surrounding the double homicide. Over the years, the case has acquired notoriety for the competing versions of the possible course of events and culprits among various investigative teams, media houses, and the general public. Drawing attention to the antithetical narrative strategies as well as the dichotomous mobilization of justice-injustice figures in these two films, the paper indexes the pervasive presence of dominant cultural anxieties vis- à -vis gender, class, and religion in post-liberalization India. Subsequently, it will also demonstrate how the complex configuration of fact and fiction in the Aarushi-Hemraj murder case, combined with the socio-cultural prejudices (as portrayed within the diegetic spaces of these two movies), contributes to the creation of a hermeneutical palimpsest where multiple versions of a single crime coexist.
AnandD (2005) The violence of security: Hindu nationalism and the politics of representing “The Muslim” as a danger. Round Table94(379): 203–215.
3.
AppaduraiA (2000) Spectral housing and urban cleansing: Notes on millennial Mumbai. Public Culture12(3): 627–651.
4.
BBC News (2013) Hemraj: Uncertain future for family of India double murders forgotten victim. BBC News, 2December. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-25149891 (accessed 5 April 2024).
5.
BoseB (2008) Modernity, globality, sexuality, and the city: A reading of Indian cinema. Global South2(1): 35–58.
CarrabineECoxPLeeM, et al. (2004) Criminology: A Sociological Introduction. Routledge.
10.
ConnellRW (ed.) (2005) Masculinities, 2nd edn. University of California Press.
11.
CostonBMKimmelM (2012) Seeing privilege where it isn’t: Marginalized masculinities and the intersectionality of privilege. Journal of Social Issues68(1): 97–111.
12.
CresswellT (2011) The vagrant/vagabond: The curious case of a mobile subject. In: CresswellTMerrimanP (eds) Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects. Ashgate, pp.239–255.
De NeveG (2011) “Keeping it in the family”: Work, education, and gender hierarchies among Tirupur’s industrial capitalists. In: DonnerH (ed.) Being Middle-Class in India: A Way of Life. Sage, pp.73–100.
DickeyS (2012) The pleasures and anxieties of being in the middle: Emerging middle-class identities in urban South India. Modern Asian Studies46(3): 559–599.
17.
DoaneMA (1987) The Desire to Desire: The Women’s Film of the 1940s. Indiana University Press.
FernandesL (2006) India’s New Middle Class: Democratic Politics in an Era of Economic Reforms. University of Minnesota Press.
21.
FerrellJ (2012) Anarchy, geography and drift. Antipode44(5): 1687–1704.
22.
FerrellJ (2022) Ghost method. In: FiddlerMKindynisTLinnemannT (eds) Ghost Criminology: The Afterlife of Crime and Punishment. New York University Press, pp.67–87.
23.
FiddlerM (2013) Playing funny games in the last house on the left : The uncanny and the “home invasion” genre. Crime Media Culture9(3): 281–299.
24.
FiddlerMLinnemannTKindynisT (2024) Ghost criminology: A framework for the discipline’s spectral turn. British Journal of Criminology64(1): 1–16.
25.
FinkelsteinM (2019) The Archive of Loss: Lively Ruination in Mill Land Mumbai. Duke University Press.
26.
FraserN (1990) Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text25(25–26): 56–80.
GordonAF (2008) Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination. University of Minnesota Press.
29.
GulzarM (2015) Talvar. Junglee Pictures.
30.
GuptaM (2015) Rahasya. Viacom 18 Motion Pictures.
31.
HallSCritcherCJeffersonT, et al. (1978) Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order. Macmillan.
32.
HalttunenK (1998) Murder Most Foul: The Killer and the American Gothic Imagination. Harvard University Press.
33.
HansonC (2008) Bestselling bodies: Mourning, melancholia and the female forensic pathologist. Women a Cultural Review19(1): 87–100.
34.
HariharanV (2022) True lies and false truths: The case of Talwar. In: NarrainS (ed.) Acts of Media: Law and Media in Contemporary India. Sage, pp.167–180.
35.
IbrahimA (2015) The not-so-happy ever after: Crime as moral corruption in the family in Hindi television news. Contributions to Indian Sociology49(3): 344–368.
KumarA (2015) The unbearable liveness of news television in India. Television & New Media16(6): 538–556.
45.
LinnemannT (2015) Capote’s ghosts: Violence, media and the spectre of suspicion. British Journal of Criminology55(3): 514–533.
46.
LokaneetaJ (2022) Narco videos, forensic psychologists and the truth-telling apparatus: Tracing evidence, law and media trials. In: NarrainS (ed.) Acts of Media: Law and Media in Contemporary India. Sage, pp.181–208.
47.
LukoseR (2005) Consuming globalization: Youth and gender in Kerala, India. Journal of Social History38(4): 915–935.
48.
LukoseR (2009) Liberalization’s Children: Gender, Youth and Consumer Citizenship in Globalizing India. Duke University Press.
49.
MathewRS (2021) The politics of the representation of Christian women characters in select Hindi films. Continuum35(2): 314–328.
50.
McGuinnessPSimpsonAFredrikssonT, et al. (2026) Hauntology: An Introduction for Criminologists. Routledge.
51.
MicheluttiL (2013) Sons of Krishna and sons of Bolivar: Charismatic kinship and leadership across India and Venezuela. Focal-Journal of Historical and Global Anthropology67: 19–31.
52.
MitraS (2020) From “angry young man’ to ‘benevolent patriarch”: Amitabh Bachchan, Bollywood stardom and the remaking of post-liberalization India. South Asian Popular Culture18(1): 63–77.
53.
MulveyL (1975) Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen16(3): 6–18.
54.
MuralidharanS (1990) Mandal, mandir aur masjid: “Hindu” communalism and the crisis of the state. Social Science18(10): 27–49.
QuinnKCanossiniEEvansV (2020) Carceral imaginaries in science fiction: Toward a palimpsestic understanding of penalty. In: HarmesMHarmesMHarmesB (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Incarceration in Popular Culture. Springer International Publishing, pp.473–485.
60.
RafterN (2000) Shots in the Mirror: Crime Films and Society. Oxford University Press.
61.
RajagopalA (2001) Politics After Television: Religious Nationalism and the Reshaping of the Indian Public. Cambridge University Press.
62.
RajagopalA (2009) The Indian Public Sphere: Readings in Media History. Oxford University Press.
TyagiASenA (2020) Love-jihad (Muslim sexual seduction) and ched-chad (sexual harassment): Hindu nationalist discourses and the ideal/deviant urban citizen in India. Gender Place & Culture27(1): 104–125.
74.
Van WesselM (2011) Cultural contractions and intergenerational relations: The construction of selfhood among middle-class youth in Baroda. In: DonnerH (ed.) Being Middle-Class in India: A Way of Life. Sage, pp.100–116.
75.
VasudevanR (2010) The Melodramatic Public: Film Form and Spectatorship in Indian Cinema. Permanent Black.
76.
VincentD (1980) Love and death and the nineteenth-century working class. Social History5(2): 223–247.
77.
WarnerMSmithD (2016) Image, technology, enchantment. In: MaysSMathesonN (eds) The Machine and the Ghost. Manchester University Press, pp.123–139.
78.
Zee News (2015) Aarushi murder case: UP police’s press conference held on 23/05/2008 after 7 days of murder. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uukxSyLjRMU&t=756s (accessed 12 February 2025).
