In this paper we argue that legal and technological shifts in cannabis marketing has a gendered impact, which research so far has ignored. Despite high variations in national criminal laws, US-based social media platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter play a huge role in enforcing certain social and political standpoints on a global scale. One example being the recent legalization and commercialization of cannabis in various states in the US. Young men with dark, anonymous profiles illegally dealing cannabis on social media are no longer the only visible traders, as today’s marketing of trademarked legal cannabis products also features women influencers, who post images exhibiting light colors, desirable environments, and beautiful landscapes. To understand this diversity, we compared 60 Instagram profiles of illegal Swedish cannabis sellers to 70 US-based cannabis influencers’ Instagram profiles. By applying theories and research from media scholars on influencing, we highlight various changes in the way cannabis is being presented and professionalized by a new group of actors. Our findings show that cannabis influencers on Instagram are changing the stereotypical characteristics of illegal cannabis culture as being almost entirely dominated by men, to one where cannabis is represented as a desirable accessory in certain feminine lifestyles. Influencers’ role in transforming cannabis culture to become more mainstream and acceptable for women could potentially effect cannabis cultures globally, as well as ongoing legalization debates.
AbidinC (2015) Communicative intimacies: Influencers and perceived interconnectedness. Ada8: 1–16.
2.
AbidinC (2017) #familygoals: Family influencers, calibrated amateurism, and justifying young digital labor. Social Media + Society3(2): 1–15.
3.
AmosA (1990) How women are targeted by the tobacco industry. World Health Forum11(4): 416–422.
4.
AttwoodF (2005) Fashion and passion: Marketing sex to women. Sexualities8(4): 392–406.
5.
BakerSAWalshMJ (2018) ‘Good morning fitfam’: Top posts, hashtags and gender display on Instagram. New Media & Society20(12): 4553–4570.
6.
BarrattMJAldridgeJ (2016) Everything you always wanted to know about drug cryptomarkets* (*but were afraid to ask). International Journal of Drug Policy35: 1–6.
7.
BellP (2001) Content analysis of visual images. In: LeeuwenTVJewittC (eds) The Handbook of Visual Analysis. SAGE Publications, pp.10–35.
BlokALindstrømMDMeilvangML, et al. (2019) Ecologies of boundaries: Modes of boundary work in professional proto-jurisdictions. Symbolic Interaction42(4): 588–617.
10.
BlumerH (1986) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press.
11.
BrymanA (2016) Social Research Methods, 5th edn.Oxford University Press.
Cavazos-RehgPAKraussMJSowlesSJ, et al. (2016) Marijuana-related posts on Instagram. Prevention Science17(6): 710–720.
15.
ChapkisW (2013) The trouble with Mary Jane’s gender. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations35(1): 71–88.
16.
DahlSLSandbergS (2015) Female cannabis users and new masculinities: The gendering of cannabis use. Sociology49(4): 696–711.
17.
DemantJBakkenSAOksanenA, et al. (2019) Drug dealing on Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram: A qualitative analysis of novel drug markets in the Nordic countries. Drug and Alcohol Review38(4): 377–385.
18.
De VeirmanMCaubergheVHuddersL (2017) Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising36(5): 798–828.
19.
DjafarovaERushworthC (2017) Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior68: 1–7.
20.
DuffyBE (2017) (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work. Yale University Press.
21.
DuffyBESchwartzB (2018) Digital “women’s work?”: Job recruitment ads and the feminization of social media employment. New Media & Society20(8): 2972–2989.
22.
EngholmIHansen-HansenE (2014) The fashion blog as genre—between user-driven bricolage design and the reproduction of established fashion system. Digital Creativity25(2): 140–154.
23.
FerrellJHaywardKMorrisonW, et al. (eds) (2016) Cultural Criminology Unleashed. Routledge.
24.
FleetwoodJAldridgeJChatwinC (2020) Gendering research on online illegal drug markets. Addiction Research & Theory28(6): 457–466.
25.
GagnonJHSimonW (2017) Sexual Conduct: The Social Sources of Human Sexuality, 2nd edn.Routledge.
HainesRJJohnsonJLCarterCI, et al. (2009) “I couldn’t say, I’m not a girl”: Adolescents talk about gender and marijuana use. Social Science & Medicine68(11): 2029–2036.
29.
HearnA (2010) Structuring feeling: Web 2.0, online ranking and rating, and the digital “reputation” economy. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization10(3/4): 421–438.
30.
HineC (2015) Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Routledge.
31.
HuntGPJoe-LaidlerKEvansK (2002) The meaning and gendered culture of getting high: Gang girls and drug use issues. Contemporary Drug Problems29(2): 375–415.
32.
HurleyZ (2019) Imagined affordances of Instagram and the fantastical authenticity of female gulf-arab social media influencers. Social Media + Society5(1): 1–16.
33.
JarrettK (2015) Feminism, Labour and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife. Routledge.
34.
KangSKO’LearyJMillerJ (2016) From forbidden fruit to the goose that lays golden eggs: Marijuana tourism in Colorado. Sage Open6(4): 1–12.
35.
KittelJ (2018) Women in weed: Gender, race, and class in the cannabis industry. The Arbutus Review9(1): 32–45.
LiuRSuhA (2017) Self-branding on social media: an analysis of style bloggers on Instagram. Procedia Computer Science124: 12–20.
38.
MaguireJSMatthewsJ (2010) Cultural intermediaries and the media. Sociology Compass4(7): 405–416.
39.
MartinJ (2018) Cryptomarkets, systemic violence and the ‘gentrification hypothesis’. Addiction113(5): 797–798.
40.
MarwickA (2013) Gender, sexuality and social media. In: HunsingerJSenftTM (eds) The Social Media Handbook. Routledge, pp.59–75.
41.
MarwickAEBoydD (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society13(1): 114–133.
42.
MoyleLChildsACoomberR, et al. (2019) #Drugsforsale: An exploration of the use of social media and encrypted messaging apps to supply and access drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy63: 101–110.
43.
O’NeillR (2020) Pursuing “wellness”: Considerations for media studies. Television & New Media21(6): 628–634.
44.
PauwelsL (2019) An integrated conceptual and methodological framework for the visual study of culture and society. In: PauwelsLMannayD (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, 2nd edn.SAGE, pp. 15–36.
45.
PilgrimKBohnet-JoschkoS (2019) Selling health and happiness how influencers communicate on Instagram about dieting and exercise: mixed methods research. BMC Public Health19(1): 1054.
46.
PinkSHorstHPostillJ, et al. (2015) Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. SAGE.
47.
PotterGBouchardMDecorteT (2013) World Wide Weed: Global Trends in Cannabis Cultivation and its Control. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
48.
PriesterJRPettyRE (2003) The influence of spokesperson trustworthiness on message elaboration, attitude strength, and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology13(4): 408–421.
49.
ReadeJ (2021) Keeping it raw on the ‘gram: Authenticity, relatability and digital intimacy in fitness cultures on Instagram. New Media & Society23(3): 535–553.
50.
ReissAJ (1987) The trained incapabilities of sociologists. In: HallidayTCJanowitzM (eds) Sociology and Its Publics. The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization. Heritage of Sociology. University of Chicago Press, pp.297–315.
51.
RitzerGJurgensonN (2010) Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture10(1): 13–36.
52.
SandbergS (2012) The importance of culture for cannabis markets: Towards an economic sociology of illegal drug markets. The British Journal of Criminology52(6): 1133–1151.
53.
ScheuerL (2015) The legal marijuana industry’s challenge for business entity law. William & Mary Business Law Review6(2): 511–556.
54.
SenftTM (2013) Microcelebrity and the branded self. In: HartleyJBurgessJBrunsA (eds) A Companion to New Media Dynamics. Wiley-Blackwell, pp.346–354.
55.
SimonWGagnonJH (2003) Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and changes. Qualitative Sociology26(4): 491–497.
56.
SmallML (2009) `How many cases do I need?’: On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography10(1): 5–38.
57.
TollMNormanM (2021) More than meets the eye: A relational analysis of young women’s body capital and embodied understandings of health and fitness on Instagram. Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health13(1): 59–76.
58.
TuAWRatnerPAJohnsonJL (2008) Gender differences in the correlates of adolescents’ cannabis use. Substance Use & Misuse43(10): 1438–1463.
59.
van DrielLDumitricaD (2021) Selling brands while staying “Authentic”: The professionalization of Instagram influencers. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies27(1): 66–84.
60.
Van SchieGWestraISchäferMT (2017) Get your hands dirty: Emerging data practices as challenge for research integrity. In: SchäferMTvan EsK (eds) The Datafied Society. Amsterdam University Press, pp.183–200.
