This article aims to further develop the understanding of the relationship and distinction between moral panics and moral regulation. To this end, a model for the comparative analysis of discursive changes over time, and between different discursive fields, is outlined. The model consists of three steps: (1) mapping general trends in news reporting; (2) analysing thematical relations in full-text news articles; and (3) conducting closer qualitative readings of news articles indicated to be of specific importance in the first two steps. Results from the presented case study – in which news reporting on benefit fraud in Sweden and the United Kingdom is analysed using the outlined model – suggest that there is a close relationship between moral panic discourse and moral regulation discourse. Using different strategies to construct social relations and deviant subjectivities through moralizing articulations, momentary outbursts of moral panics, and the more common, routine, forms of moral regulation, draw and depend upon each other to organize consensus and the management of risks in processes of discursive legitimization.
BrushL.D. (1997) Worthy widows, welfare cheats: Proper womanhood in expert needs talk about single mothers in the United States, 1900 to 1988. Gender and Society11(6): 720–746.
2.
BunyanN. (2009) Disability benefits cheat caught on camera playing rounds of golf. Daily Telegraph, 11June.
3.
CarlbomM. (2007) Swedes collect 10 billion by cheating. Dagens Nyheter, 10November, p.9.
4.
ChunnD.E.GaviganS.A.M. (2004) Welfare law, welfare fraud and the moral regulation of the ‘never deserving’ poor. Social & Legal Studies13(2): 219–243.
5.
CohenS. (1972) Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. London: MacGibbon & Kee.
6.
CohenS.YoungJ. (Eds.) (1973) The Manufacture of News: Social Problems, Deviance and the Mass Media. London: Constable.
7.
CorriganP.SayerD. (1985) The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
8.
CritcherC. (2009) Widening the focus: Moral panics as moral regulation. British Journal of Criminology49(1): 17–34.
9.
DalrympleT. (2003) How to be a modern citizen: Cheat, lie, self-destruct and be anti-social. The Times, 29August.
FraserN.GordonL. (1994) A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state. Signs19(2): 309–326.
14.
FUT-delegationen (2007) Vad kostar felen? Omfattning av felaktiga utbetalningar från trygghetssystemen. Stockholm: Delegationen mot felaktiga utbetalningar.
15.
GilensM. (1999) Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
GlaserB.G.StraussA.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
17.
GoldingP.MiddletonS. (1982) Images of Welfare: Press and Public Attitudes to Poverty. Oxford: Robertson.
18.
HallS.CritcherC.ClarkeJ.RobertsB.TonyJ. (1978) Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order. London: Macmillan.
19.
HierS.P. (2002) Conceptualizing moral panic through a moral economy of harm. Critical Sociology28(3): 311–334.
20.
HierS.P. (2008) Thinking beyond moral panic: Risk, responsibility, and the politics of moralization. Theoretical Criminology12(2): 173–190.
21.
JohnsonB. (2010) Kampen om sjukfrånvaron. Lund: Arkiv.
22.
KorsellL.E.HagstedtJ.SkinnariJ. (2008) Från kelgrisar till styvbarn - fusket med välfärdssystemen. Nordisk tidsskrift for kriminalvidenskab95(1): 21–38.
LazzaratoM. (2009) Neoliberalism in action: Inequality, insecurity and the reconstitution of the social. Theory Culture Society29(109): 109–133.
25.
LindgrenS.LundströmR. (2009) Discursive networks: Visualising media representations of crime victims. In: LimJ. (Ed.) Computer-Aided Qualitative Research 2009 [CAQR2009 Proceedings]. Utrecht: Merlien Institute, 68–85.
26.
MisraJ.MollerS.KaridesM. (2003) Envisioning dependency: Changing media depictions of welfare in the 20th century. Social Problems50(4): 482–504.
27.
OsarehF. (1996) Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: A review of the literature. Libri46: 149–158, 217–255.
28.
PerssonO.DanellR.SchneiderJ.W. (2009) How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson, Special volume of the e-zine of the ISSI 05-S (June): 9–24.
29.
RohloffA.WrightS. (2010) Moral panic and social theory: Beyond the heuristic. Current Sociology58(3): 403–419.
30.
RothsteinB. (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
RRV (1995) FUSK – Systembrister och fusk i välfärdssystemen. RRV, 1995: 32. Stockholm: Riksrevisionsverket.
32.
SchmidtV.A. (2010) Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review2(01): 1–25.
33.
SteenslandB. (2007) The Failed Welfare Revolution: America’s Struggle over Guaranteed Income Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
SvallforsS. (1996) Välfärdsstatens Moraliska Ekonomi: Välfärdsopinionen i 90-talets Sverige. Umeå: Boréa.
35.
TaylorM. (2007) Jail for cheat. Guardian, 20January, p.9.
36.
The Times (2007) Brothel madam jailed as benefit cheat. The Times7September.
37.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
WierupL. (2006) Depressed bikers. Dagens Nyheter, 21February, p.12.
