Research in two of the first grant-
maintained schools during the
first term in their new status helps the
author, who is at the Open
University, explore topical questions.
What factors motivated opting out?
What is the role of governing bodies
in policy making and management?
Will the schools offer 'backdoor'
selection? Is their funding too
favourable? Is opting out the path to
freedom from local bureaucracy or an
educational dead end?
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Association of Metropolitan Authorities (1988 ), Grant Maintained Schools: Independence or Isolation, London, Association of Metropolitan Authorities.
2.
Dennison, W. (1990), 'Opting for uncertainty', Times Educational Supplement, 23.3.90.
3.
Department of Education and Science (1987), Grant-Maintained Schools: Consultation Paper, HMSO, London.
4.
Department of Education and Science (1988), Education Reform Act: Grant-Maintained SchoolsHMSO, London.
5.
Flude, M. and Hammer, M. (1989), 'Opting for a uncertain future: grant-maintained schools' in Flude, M. and Hammer, M. (eds), The Education Reform Act 1988: Its Origins and ImplicatioFalmer Press, Lewes.
6.
Kogan, M. (1975) Educational Policy Making, Aller and Unwin, London.
7.
Maclure, S. (1988), Education Reformed, Hodder and Stoughton, London.
8.
Meredith, P. (1959), `The Education Reform Act grant-maintained schools' , Education and the Law, 1, 3, 95-103.
