The traditional processes of allocating resources in F/HE ('last year plus or minus') are
breaking down, and the Audit Commission is pressing for 'value for money'. This article
discusses a system which helps colleges make real decisions about resources.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Audit Commission (1985) Obtaining Better Value from Further Education, HMSO.
2.
Bailey, A.J. (1982) 'The question of legitimation, a response to Eric Hoyle,'Educational Management and Administration10, 2.
3.
Birch, D.W. and Latcham, J. (1985a) The Audit Commission and FE: Value for Money and the Audit Ratios, Coombe Lodge Report, 18, 3.
4.
Birch, D.W. and Latcham, J. (1985b) Measuring College Performance, Coombe Lodge Report, 18, 3.
5.
Cardy, D.F. (1986) 'A resourcing model for further and higher education in an English Local Authority', paper to 8th European Air Forum, Loughborough, England.
6.
Carley, M. (1980) Rational Techniques in Policy Analysis, Heinemann.
7.
Edwards, P. (1985) Local Authority Allocation of Resources to FE, Coombe Lodge Report, 18, 1.
8.
Hewton, E. (1986) Education in Recession, Allen and Unwin.
9.
Jones, D. (1986) Accountability and Budgets in Colleges: A Practical Unit Cost Approach, Coombe Lodge Report, 19, 1.
10.
Lindblom, C.E. (1959) 'The science of muddling through', Public Administration Review.
