This study explores the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational culture among formal and informal teacher leaders in Bahrain. Utilizing partial least squares structural equation modeling to analyze the data, it reveals that organizational culture significantly impacts leadership practices, with formal leaders experiencing higher job satisfaction due to their structured roles and authority. These leaders report greater satisfaction with income and respect from colleagues, attributed to their recognized positions. Conversely, informal leaders, despite their contributions, feel less influenced by organizational culture and report lower satisfaction, particularly regarding compensation. The study underscores the need for educational institutions to recognize and support both formal and informal leaders to enhance leadership practices and job satisfaction. Key recommendations include clear communication from supervisors, fair compensation through regular salary reviews, and fostering a collaborative environment for professional growth. By addressing these areas, schools can create a more inclusive and effective leadership environment, leading to improved educational outcomes and a positive school atmosphere.
Abilad Newspaper (2025, January 15) وزير التربية: توظيف ٣١٣٢ معلماً بحرينياً وإنهاء عقود مئات الأجانب. https://www.albiladpress.com/news/2025/5937/bahrain/897418.html#:∼:text=أكد%20وزير%20التربية%20والتعليم%20محمد,تم%20توظيف%20203%20معلمين%20بحرينيين.
2.
AliFRasoolimaneshSMSarstedtM, et al. (2018) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management30(1): 514–538.
AltajerZ (2010, March 21) «التربية»: شروط جديدة للترقي لمعلم أول. https://www.mohamoon-bh.com/Default.aspx?action=DisplayNews&ID=7665#:∼:text=معلم%20أول%20لمدة%20عام%20دراسي%20واحد%20قابلة,الشروط%20الجديدة%20إلى%20تطوير%20معايير%20وآليات%20اختيار.
5.
Alwasat News (2017, May 12) “التربية”: من الصعب تحديد أعداد المعلمين “الوافدين” في المدارس لأنهم “متحركون.” https://www.alwasatnews.com/news/995585.html#:∼:text=التعليم%20الثانوي%20الصناعي%20كمثال,حرااااااااااام%20والله%20حراااااااام%20.
6.
AndrewMD (1974) Teacher Leadership: A Model for Change. Washington, DC: ERIC.
7.
AngellePSDeHartCA (2016) Comparison and evaluation of four models of teacher leadership. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership1(1): 85–119.
8.
AntunesRRSilvaAP (2015) The teachers’ leadership for equity and learning. Revista Lusofona de Educacao30(30).
9.
AsamoahDAbdullahNAShahrillM, et al. (2023). Exemplary leadership qualities of mathematics teacher leaders. Journal of Mathematics Instruction,Social Research and Opinion2(3). DOI: 10.58421/misro.v2i3.163.
10.
BaileyLPurintonTAl-MahdiO, et al. (2021) Conceptualizing school leadership in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) cultures: Demarcating challenges for research. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(1): 93–111.
11.
BerlandLKHammerD (2012) Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching49(1). DOI: 10.1002/tea.20446.
12.
BoyacigillerNAAdlerNJ (1991) The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context. Academy of Management Review16(2). DOI: 10.5465/amr.1991.4278936.
13.
BurhanuddinB (2019) The scale of school organizational culture in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Management33(7). DOI: 10.1108/IJEM-01-2018-0030.
14.
BushTGloverD (2016) School leadership and management in South Africa: Findings from a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Management30(2). DOI: 10.1108/IJEM-07-2014-0101.
15.
BuyukgozeHCaliskanOGümüşS (2022) Linking distributed leadership with collective teacher innovativeness: The mediating roles of job satisfaction and professional collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership: 174114322211308. DOI: 10.1177/17411432221130879.
16.
CeritY (2009) The effects of servant leadership behaviours of school principals on teachers’ job satisfaction. Educational Management Administration and Leadership37(5). DOI: 10.1177/1741143209339650.
17.
Cepeda-CarrionGCegarra-NavarroJGCilloV (2019) Tips to use partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management23(1): 67–89.
18.
ChengYC (1993) Profiles of organizational culture and effective schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement4(2). DOI: 10.1080/0924345930040201.
19.
ClarkLMDePiperJNFrankTJ, et al. (2014) Teacher characteristics associated with mathematics teachers’ beliefs and awareness of their students’ mathematical dispositions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education45(2). DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.45.2.0246.
20.
CosenzaMN (2015) Defining teacher leadership: Affirming the teacher leader model standards. Issues in Teacher Education24(2).
21.
CriswellBARushtonGTNachtigallD, et al. (2018) Strengthening the vision: Examining the understanding of a framework for teacher leadership development by experienced science teachers. Science Education102(6): 1265–1287.
22.
CrowtherFFergusonMHannL (2009) Developing Teacher Leaders: How Teacher Leadership Enhances School Success. Corwin Press.
23.
DanceyCPReidyJ (2007) Statistics without Maths for Psychology. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
24.
Danielson C (2006) Teacher Leadership that Strengthens Professional Practice. Arlington, Virginia, US: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
25.
DavidHAHartleyHOPearsonES (1954) The distribution of the ratio, in a single normal sample, of range to standard deviation. Biometrika41(3/4): 482.
26.
DemirKAkifM (2015) The effect of organizational trust on the culture of teacher leadership in primary schools. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri15(3). DOI: 10.12738/estp.2015.3.2337.
DouDDevosGValckeM (2017) The relationships between school autonomy gap, principal leadership, teachers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership45(6): 959–977. DOI: 10.1177/1741143216653975.
29.
EargleJCE (2013) “I’m not a bystander”: Developing teacher leadership in a rural school-university collaboration. Rural Educator35(1).
FairmanJCMackenzieSV (2015) How teacher leaders influence others and understand their leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education18(1): 61–87.
32.
FanYChenJShirkeyG, et al. (2016) Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: an updated review. Ecological Processes5(1): 19.
33.
FrostD (2010) Teacher leadership and educational innovation. Zbornik Instituta Za Pedagoska Istrazivanja42(2). DOI: 10.2298/ZIPI1002201F.
34.
FrostDHarrisA (2003) Teacher leadership: Towards a research agenda. Cambridge Journal of Education33(3). DOI: 10.1080/0305764032000122078.
35.
GladwinTNHofstedeG (1981) Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. The Academy of Management Review6(4). DOI: 10.2307/257651.
36.
GlaveliNManolitzasPTsourouE, et al. (2023) Unlocking teacher job satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-criteria satisfaction analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01124-z.
37.
GreenAMKentAM (2016) Developing science and mathematics teacher leaders through a math, science & technology initiative. The Professional Educator40(1).
38.
GumusSBellibasMSEsenM, et al. (2018) A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration and Leadership46(1). DOI: 10.1177/1741143216659296.
39.
HaironSGohJWP (2015) Pursuing the elusive construct of distributed leadership: Is the search over?Educational Management Administration & Leadership43(5). DOI: 10.1177/1741143214535745.
40.
HairJFHowardMCNitzlC (2020) Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research109: 101–110.
41.
HammadWSamierEAMohammedA (2022) Mapping the field of educational leadership and management in the Arabian Gulf region: A systematic review of Arabic research literature. Educational Management Administration & Leadership50(1): 6–25.
42.
HammadWSawalhiRSalim Al-HarthiA, et al. (2025) Perceptions of teacher leadership in the Arab region: A comparative analysis of three countries. Educational Management Administration & Leadership53(2): 258–278.
43.
HarrisAMuijsD (2003) Teacher leadership : A review of the research. Leadership, January: 1–5.
44.
HeikkaJWaniganayakeM (2011) Pedagogical leadership from a distributed perspective within the context of early childhood education. International Journal of Leadership in Education14(4). DOI: 10.1080/13603124.2011.577909.
45.
HellerHWClayRPerkinsC (1993) The relationship between teacher job satisfaction and principal leadership style. Journal of School Leadership3(1): 74–86. DOI: 10.1177/105268469300300108.
IgolkinaAAMeshcheryakovG (2020) Semopy: A python package for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal27(6): 952–963.
48.
KilinçAÇ (2014) Examining the relationship between teacher leadership and school climate. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri14(5). DOI: 10.12738/estp.2014.5.2159.
49.
KouzesJMPosnerBZ (2010) The Truth about Leadership: The No-Fads,Heart-of-the-Matter Facts You Need to Know. John Wiley & Sons.
50.
KrejcieRVMorganDW (1970) Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement30(3). DOI: 10.1177/001316447003000308.
51.
LeblancPRSheltonMM (1997) Teacher leadership: The needs of teachers. Action in Teacher Education19(3): 32–48. DOI: 10.1080/01626620.1997.10462877.
52.
LiuYMŞBellibaşGümüşS (2021) The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(3): 430–453. DOI: 10.1177/1741143220910438.
53.
LiuY (2021) Contextual influence on formal and informal teacher leadership. International Journal of Educational Research Open2: 100028.
54.
LowryPBGaskinJ (2014) Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication57(2): 123–146.
55.
LubisFRHanumF (2020) Prociding title: Proceedings of the 2nd Yogyakarta international conference on educational management/administration and pedagogy (YICEMAP 2019) Oraganizational Culture. Atlantis Press 511(Yicemap 2019).
56.
Luisa Morales-MaureDGarcía-MarimónOGarcía-VázquezE, et al. (2022) Leading teachers who promote math learning. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing6(1).
57.
MacBeathJ (ed) (1998) Effective School Leadership: Responding to Change. New York, USA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
58.
MargolisJ (2020) The semiformality of teacher leadership on the edge of chaos. Harvard Educational Review90(3): 397–418.
MincklerCH (2014) School leadership that builds teacher social capital. Educational Management Administration & Leadership42(5): 657–679. DOI: 10.1177/1741143213510502.
61.
MuijsDHarrisA (2006) Teacher led school improvement: Teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching and Teacher Education22(8). DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.010.
NguyenDHarrisANgD (2020) A review of the empirical research on teacher leadership (2003–2017): Evidence, patterns and implications. Journal of Educational Administration58(1). DOI: 10.1108/JEA-02-2018-0023.
64.
NickersonSDVaughnMLambL, et al. (2018) A model for selecting exemplary mathematics and science teacher leaders. Journal of School Administration Research and Development3(1). DOI: 10.32674/JSARD.V3I1.1933.
65.
NormanEParamansyahAAbdanMS (2022) The role of organizational culture in the effectiveness of school organizations. Da’watuna: Journal of Communication and Islamic Broadcasting2(3). DOI: 10.47467/dawatuna.v2i3.2059.
66.
NorthDC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Institutions,Institutional Change and Economic Performance. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511808678.
PiawCY (2012) Mastering Research Methods. McGraw-Hill.
70.
PietschMTulowitzkiPKochT (2019) On the differential and shared effects of leadership for learning on teachers’ organizational commitment and job satisfaction: A multilevel perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly55(5): 705–741. DOI: 10.1177/0013161X18806346.
71.
Pineda-BáezCBaumanCAndrewsD (2020) Empowering teacher leadership: A cross-country study. International Journal of Leadership in Education23(4): 388–414.
72.
PrintySLiuY (2021) Distributed leadership globally: The interactive nature of principal and teacher leadership in 32 countries. Educational Administration Quarterly57(2). DOI: 10.1177/0013161X20926548.
73.
PunchKF (2004) Introduction to Research Methods in Education (Google eBook). Ta - Tt -.
74.
RenLSmithWM (2018) Teacher characteristics and contextual factors: Links to early primary teachers’ mathematical beliefs and attitudes. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education21(4). DOI: 10.1007/s10857-017-9365-3.
75.
RobbinsSPCoulterM (2017) Management 13E. India: Pearson India Noida.
76.
RosseelY (2012) Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software48: 1–36.
77.
SarstedtMRingleCMHairJF (2017) Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Handbook of Market Research. In: Handbook of Market Research. Cham: Springer, pp. 587–632.
78.
SayadiY (2016) The effect of dimensions of transformational, transactional, and non-leadership on the job satisfaction and organizational commitment of teachers in Iran. Management in Education30(2): 57–65. DOI: 10.1177/0892020615625363.
79.
SawalhiRSellamiA (2024) Factors influencing teacher leadership: Voices of public school teachers in Qatar. International Journal of Leadership in Education27(4): 779–796.
80.
ScheinEH (1990) Organizational culture: What it is and how to change it. In: Human Resource Management in International Firms. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11255-5_4.
81.
ScheinEH (2004) Organizational Culture and Leadership. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
82.
SchottCvan RoekelHTummersLG (2020) Teacher leadership: A systematic review, methodological quality assessment and conceptual framework. Educational Research Review31. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100352.
83.
ScottWR (2014) W. Richard SCOTT (1995), Institutions and organizations. Ideas, interests and identities. M@n@gement 17(2). DOI: 10.3917/mana.172.0136.
84.
ShahSR (2017) The significance of teacher leadership in TESOL: A theoretical perspective. Arab World English Journal8(4): 240–258.
85.
SilinsHMulfordB (2004) Schools as learning organisations - Effects on teacher leadership and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement15(3–4). DOI: 10.1080/09243450512331383272.
86.
SilvaDYGimbertBNolanJ (2000) Sliding the doors: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education102(4): 779–804.
87.
SleimanNAHAlsalehAAAbdel-HameedFS, et al. (2025) Examining educational leadership preparation and development programmes in the Gulf region: a comparative study of Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar. London Review of Education23(1): 13.
88.
SmithPSHayesMLLyonsKM (2017) The ecology of instructional teacher leadership. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior46: 267–288.
89.
SmylieMAMayrowetzD (2009) Footnotes to teacher leadership. In: International Handbook of Research on Teachers and Teaching. Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 277–289.
90.
SmithB (2019) Leadership for “the all of it”: Formalizing teacher-leader networks. Teachers College Record121(3). DOI: 10.1177/016146811912100308.
91.
SmylieMADennyJW (1990) Teacher Leadership: Tensions and Ambiguities in Organizational Perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly26(3). DOI: 10.1177/0013161X90026003003.
SpillaneJColdrenA (2011) Diagnosis and Design for School Improvement: Using a Distributed Perspective to Lead and Manage Change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. 10.12698/cpre.diagnosisanddesignbk.
94.
SpillaneJPDiamondJBJitaL (2003) Leading instruction: The distribution of leadership for instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies35(5). DOI: 10.1080/0022027021000041972.
95.
SurannaKJMossDM (1999) Describing preservice teachers’ conceptions of the role of teacher leader. In: The Role of Visual Representations in the Learning of Mathematics.
96.
TesfawTA (2014) The relationship between transformational leadership and job satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership42(6): 903–918. DOI: 10.1177/1741143214551948.
97.
ThomasLTuytensMDevosG, et al. (2020) Transformational school leadership as a key factor for teachers’ job attitudes during their first year in the profession. Educational Management Administration & Leadership48(1): 106–132. DOI: 10.1177/1741143218781064.
98.
TianMRiskuMCollinK (2016) A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013. Educational Management Administration & Leadership44(1). DOI: 10.1177/1741143214558576.
99.
TsaiY (2011) Relationship between organizational culture, leadership behavior and job satisfaction. BMC Health Services Research11. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-98.
WagnerBDFrenchL (2010) Motivation, work satisfaction, and teacher change among early childhood teachers. Journal of Research in Childhood Education24(2). DOI: 10.1080/02568541003635268.
102.
WangMHoD (2019) A quest for teacher leadership in the twenty-first century – emerging themes for future research. International Journal of Educational Management34(2): 354–372. DOI: 10.1108/IJEM-01-2019-0038.
103.
WangMHoD (2020a) A quest for teacher leadership in the twenty-first century – emerging themes for future research. International Journal of Educational Management34(2): 354–372.
104.
WangMHoD (2020b) Making sense of teacher leadership in early childhood education in China. International Journal of Leadership in Education23(3): 300–314.
105.
WangYARhemtullaM (2021) Power analysis for parameter estimation in structural equation modeling: A discussion and tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science4(1).
106.
WasleyPA (1991) Teachers Who Lead: The Rhetoric of Reform and the Realities of Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
107.
WennerJACampbellT (2017) The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research87(1). DOI: 10.3102/0034654316653478.
108.
WhitakerT (1995) Informal teacher leadership—the key to successful change in the middle level school. NASSP Bulletin79(567): 76–81.
109.
WilsonAABoatrightMDLandon-HaysM (2014) Middle school teachers’ discipline-specific use of gestures and implications for disciplinary literacy instruction. Journal of Literacy Research46(2). DOI: 10.1177/1086296X14532615.
110.
YohannesMEWasongaTA (2021) Leadership styles and teacher job satisfaction in Ethiopian schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership: 174114322110416. DOI: 10.1177/17411432211041625.
111.
York-BarrJDukeK (2004) What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research74(3): 255–316.
