This meta-analysis combined various leadership approaches to examine the relationship between educational leadership and student achievement. The literature review encompassed 348 independent research articles/dissertations, with a sample group of 3,659,268 study subjects. Analyses conducted using a random-effects model revealed that educational leadership had a medium-level effect on student achievement. The impact of educational leadership on student achievement was found to be more substantial in collectivist cultures (e.g. Asia) than in individualistic cultures (e.g. the USA). Among the leadership theories, instructional leadership and leadership practices demonstrated the most significant effects. The influence of educational leadership on student achievement varies according to geographical continent, national cultural background, school level, and academic achievement. As anticipated, the impact of educational leadership practices on student achievement diminished over time during exceptional circumstances such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the observed effect of educational leadership on student achievement, future research should investigate the influence of leadership on other school components and stakeholders.
AinleyJCarstensR (2018) Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018 conceptual framework. OECD Education Working Papers No. 187. https://doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en.
2.
Alig-MielcarekJMHoyWK (2005) Instructional leadership: Its nature, meaning, and influence. In: MiskelCGHoyWK (eds) Educational Leadership and Reform. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, 29–54.
3.
AsakawaSOhtakeFSanoS (2025) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the academic achievement of elementary and junior high school students: Analysis using administrative data from Amagasaki City. Review of Economics of the Household23: 405–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-024-09715-8.
4.
BassBM (1998) The ethics of transformational leadership. In: CiullaJB (ed.) Ethics: The Heart of Leadership. Westport: Quorum, 169–192.
BlaseJBlaseJ (2000) Effective instructional leadership: Teachers’ perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration38(2): 130–141.
7.
BorensteinMHedgesLVHigginsJPT, et al. (2009) Introduction to Meta-Analysis. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
8.
BoyceJBowersAJ (2018) Toward an evolving conceptualization of instructional leadership as leadership for learning: Meta-narrative review of 109 quantitative studies across 25 years. Journal of Educational Administration56(2): 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-06-2016-0064.
9.
BoyerDP, 2012. A study of the relationship between the servant leader principal on school culture and student achievement in the lower Kuskokwim school district. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Grand Canyon University, Arizona.
10.
BraunD, 2008. The relationship among essential school leadership preparation practices, principal leader behavior, school learning environment, and student achievement in elementary and middle schools in Rhode Island. Doctoral dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No: 3321561).
11.
BrewerDJ (1993) Principals and student outcomes: Evidence from U.S. high schools. Economics of Education Review12(4): 281–292.
12.
BurcarZ (2017) Differences between primary and secondary school principals’ role, their role and potential principals’ perceptions. MEST Journal5(2): 7–14.
13.
BurnsJM (1978) Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
14.
ChapmanCMuijsDReynoldsDSammonsPTeddlieC2016) Routledge International Handbook of Educational Effectiveness and Improvement Research: Research, Policy, and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge, Abingdon.
15.
ChenDNingBBosW (2022) Relationship between principal leadership and students’ mathematics achievement: A comparative study between Germany and Chinese Taipei. Asia Pacific Journal of Education42(2): 228–244.
16.
ChinJM (2007) Meta-analysis of transformational school leadership effects on school outcomes in Taiwan and the USA. Asia Pacific Education Review8(2): 166–177.
17.
CogaltayNKaradagE (2015) Introduction to meta-analysis. In: KaradagE (ed.) Leadership and Organizational Outcomes: Meta-Analysis of Empirical Studies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 19–28.
CookeASmithDBoothA (2012) Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research22(10): 1435–1443.
20.
CooperHHedgesLVValentineJC (2009) The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
DaniëlsEHondeghemADochyF (2019) A review on leadership and leadership development in educational settings. Educational Research Review27: 110–125.
22.
DavisBW (2010) The relationship of principal leadership style as it affects school climate and student achievement. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No: 3425719).
23.
DayCLeithwoodK, eds. (2007) Successful Principal Leadership in Times of Change: An International Perspective (Vol. 5). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
24.
DayCSammonsPHopkinsD, et al. (2010) Ten Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership. Nottingham: National College for Leadership of Schools and Children’s Services.
25.
DicksonMWDen HartogDNMitchelsonJK (2003) Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. The Leadership Quarterly14(6): 729–768.
26.
DimmockC (2000) Designing the Learning-Centred School: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. London: Falmer Press.
DimmockCWalkerA (2000) Developing comparative and international educational leadership and management: A cross-cultural model. School Leadership & Management20(2): 143–160.
29.
DreierM (2013) Quality assessment in meta-analysis: Assessing the validity of study outcomes. In: DoiARS (ed) Methods of Clinical Epidemiology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 213–228.
30.
DuvalSTweedieR (2000) A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association95(449): 89–98.
31.
EstapaAL (2009) The relationship between the transformational leadership characteristics of principals, as perceived by teachers, and student achievement on standardized tests. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No: 3378413).
FlathB (1989) The principal as instructional leader. ATA Magazines69(3): 19–22.
34.
FullerEYoungMBakerBD (2011) Do principal preparation programs influence student achievement through the building of teacher-team qualifications by the principal? An exploratory analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly47(1): 173–216.
35.
GelfandMJBhawukDPSNishiLH, et al. (2004) In: Individual and collectivism. In: HouseRJHangesPJJavidanM, et al. (eds) Leadership, Culture, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, C. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 437–512.
36.
GoddardRGoddardYKimES, et al. (2015) A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education121(4): 501–530.
37.
GronnP (2003) The New Work of Educational Leaders: Changing Leadership Practice in an Era of School Reform. London: Paul Chapman.
38.
GrubbWFlessaJ (2006) A job too big for one: Multiple principals and other non traditional approaches to school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly42(4): 518–550.
39.
GulbinKM, 2008. Transformational leadership: Is it a factor for improving student achievement in high poverty secondary schools in Pennsylvania?Doctoral dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No: 3303551).
40.
HallingerP (2003) Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education33(3): 329–352.
41.
HallingerP (2005) Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools4(3): 221–239.
42.
HallingerP (2011) Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration49(2): 125–142.
43.
HallingerP (2015) The Evolution of Instructional Leadership. In Assessing Instructional Leadership with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15533-3_1.
44.
HallingerP (2018) Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership46(1): 5–24.
45.
HallingerPBickmanLDavisK (1996) School context, principal leadership and student reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal96(5): 527–549.
46.
HallingerPHeckR (2010a) Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management30(2): 95–110.
47.
HallingerPHeckRH (1996) Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly32(1): 5–44.
48.
HallingerPHeckRH (1998) Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement9(2): 157–191.
49.
HallingerPHeckRH (2010b) Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement?Educational Management Administration & Leadership38(6): 654–678.
50.
HallingerPKovačevićJ (2019) A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research89(3): 335–369.
51.
HallingerPLeeM (2014) Mapping instructional leadership in Thailand: Has education reform impacted principal practice?Educational Management Administration & Leadership42(1): 6–29.
52.
HallingerPLeithwoodK (1996) Culture and educational administration: A case of finding out what you don’t know you don’t know. Journal of Educational Administration34(5): 98–116.
53.
HallingerPMurphyJ (1985) Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal86(2): 217–247.
54.
HallingerPWangWCChenCW, et al. (2015) Assessing Instructional Leadership with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Dordrecht: Springer.
55.
HammersteinSKönigCDreisörnerT, et al. (2021) Effects of COVID-19-related school closures on student achievement—a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology12: 746289.
56.
Harris-SmithCES, 2012. A study of the effect of secondary school leadership styles on student achievement in selected secondary schools in Louisiana. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Louisiana, Louisiana.
HeckRHHallingerP (2009) Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal46(3): 659–689.
61.
HeckRHHallingerP (2010a) Collaborative leadership effects on school improvement: Integrating unidirectional- and reciprocal-effects models. The Elementary School Journal111(2): 226–252.
62.
HeckRHHallingerP (2010b) Testing a longitudinal model of distributed leadership effects on school improvement. The Leadership Quarterly21(5): 867–885.
63.
HeckRHHallingerP (2014) Modeling the longitudinal effects of school leadership and teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration52(5): 653–681.
64.
HedgesLVOlkinI (1985) Statistical Method for Meta-analysis. New York, NY: Academic Press.
65.
HendriksMAScheerensJ (2013) School leadership effects revisited: A review of empirical studies guided by indirect-effect models. School Leadership and Management33(4): 373–394.
66.
HeynemanS (2016) The heyneman/loxley effect: Three decades of debate. In: McGrathSAGuQ (eds) Routledge Handbook of International Education and Development. London: Routledge, 150–167.
67.
HigginsJPThompsonSG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine21(11): 1539–1558.
68.
HittDHTuckerPD (2016) Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research86(2): 531–569.
69.
HofstedeG (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
70.
HofstedeG (1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
71.
HofstedeG (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. London: Sage.
72.
HofstedeGHofstedeGJ (2005) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
73.
HofstedeGHofstedeGJMinkovM (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
74.
HoyAWHoyWK (2013) Instructional Leadership: A Research-Based Guide to Learning in Schools. Boston, ABD: Pearson.
JacksonCLColquittJAWessonMJ, et al. (2006) Psychological collectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology91(4): 884.
77.
JungDIAvolioBJ (1999) Effects of leadership style and followers’ cultural orientation on performance in group and individual task conditions. Academy of Management Journal42(2): 208–218.
78.
KaradagE (2020) The effect of educational leadership on students’ achievement: A cross-cultural meta-analysis research on studies between 2008 and 2018. Asia Pacific Education Review21(1): 49–64.
79.
KaramAAAlderbashiKYSalmanDA (2024) Exploring the online leadership effect on blended learning in educational institutions: Post-COVID-19 learning context. International Journal of Technology Innovation and Management (IJTIM)4(1): 32–46.
80.
KirkmanBLShapiroDL (2001) The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal44(3): 557–569.
81.
KouzesJMPosnerBZ (2010) The Truth about Leadership: The No-Fads, Heart-of-the Matter Facts You Need to Know. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
82.
KrügerMLWitziersBSleegersP (2007) The impact of school leadership on school level factors: Validation of a causal model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement18(1): 1–20.
83.
KulinskayaEMorgenthalerSStaudteRG (2008) Meta-analysis: A Guide to Calibrating and Combining Statistical Evidence. London: John Wiley & Sons.
84.
KwanP (2020) Is transformational leadership theory passé? Revisiting the integrative effect of instructional leadership and transformational leadership on student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly56(2): 321–349.
85.
LeithwoodK (1992) The move toward transformational leadership. Educational Leadership49(5): 8–12.
86.
LeithwoodK (2005) A Review of the Research: Educational Leadership. Philadelphia, PA: Laboratory for Student Success Temple University.
87.
LeithwoodK (2012) Ontario Leadership Framework with a Discussion of the Leadership Foundations. OISE: Institute for Education Leadership.
88.
LeithwoodKDayC (2007) Starting with what we know. In: DayCLeithwoodK (eds) Successful Principal Leadership in Times of Change. New York, NY: Springer, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5516-1_1.
89.
LeithwoodKDayCSammonsP, et al. (2006) Seven Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
90.
LeithwoodKHarrisAHopkinsD (2008) Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management28(1): 27–42.
91.
LeithwoodKHarrisAHopkinsD (2020a) Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership and Management40(1): 5–22.
92.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2006) Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement17(2): 201–227.
93.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2008) Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly44(4): 496–528.
94.
LeithwoodKLouisKSAndersonS, et al. (2004) Review of Research: How Leadership Influences Student Learning. St. Paul: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, University of Minnesota.
95.
LeithwoodKSeashore-LouisK (2012) Linking Leadership to Student Learning. Indianapolis, IN: Jossey-Bass.
96.
LeithwoodKSunJ (2012) The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly48(3): 387–423.
97.
LeithwoodKSunJSchumackerR (2020b) How school leadership influences student learning: A test of “The Four Paths Model.”. Educational Administration Quarterly56(4): 570–599.
98.
LiebowitzDDPorterL (2019) The effect of principal behaviors on student, teacher, and school outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research89(5): 785–827.
99.
LipseyMWWilsonDB (2001) Practical Meta-analysis (Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
100.
LittelHJCorcoranJPillaiV (2008) Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
101.
LouisKSDretzkeBWahlstromK (2010) How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement21(3): 315–336.
102.
LudewigUKleinkorresRSchaufelbergerR, et al. (2022) COVID-19 pandemic and student reading achievement: Findings from a school panel study. Frontiers in Psychology13: 876485.
103.
MaeyerSDRymenansRVan PetegemP, et al. (2007) Educational leadership and pupil achievement: The choice of a valid conceptual model to test effect school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement18(2): 125–145.
104.
MarksHMPrintySM (2003) Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly39(3): 370–397.
105.
MarzanoRJWatersTMcNultyBA (2005) School Leadership that Works: From Research to Results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
106.
MayNK, 2010. The relationship between principal leadership styles and student achievement in elementary schools. Doctoral dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No: 3404635).
107.
MulfordBSillinsHLeithwoodK (2004) Educational Leadership for Organizational Learning and Improved Student Outcomes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
108.
MurphyJElliottSNGoldringE, et al. (2006) Learning-centered Leadership: A Conceptual Foundation. Vanderbilt: Learning Sciences Institute, Vanderbilt University (NJ1).
109.
NelsonAL, 2012. The relationship between middle school teachers’ perceptions of principals’ transformational leadership practices, teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Southern Mississippi. Mississippi.
110.
NettlesSMHerringtonC (2007) Revisiting the importance of the direct effects of school leadership on student achievement: The implications for school improvement policy. Peabody Journal of Education82(4): 724–736.
111.
NewmanKLNollenSD (1996) Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Studies27(4): 753–779.
112.
NoeJ, 2012. The relationshıp between principal’s emotional intelligence quotient, school culture and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Liberty University, Virginia.
113.
OdegaardLC, 2008. The relationship between teacher-identified principal leadership behavior and effectiveness and student achievement in South Dakota secondary schools. Doctoral dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No: 3318826).
114.
O’DonnellRJWhiteGP (2005) Within the accountability era: Principals’ instructional leadership behaviors and student achievement. NASSP Bulletin89(645): 56–71.
115.
OECD (2001) Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2000. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264195905-en.
OECD (2019) TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en.
119.
OECD (2020) TALIS 2018 Results (volume II): Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en.
120.
PetittiDB (2000) Meta-analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-effectiveness Analysis: Methods for Quantitative Synthesis in Medicine (No. 31). Oxford University Press.
121.
QianHWalkerALiX (2017) The west wind vs the east wind: Instructional leadership model in China. Journal of Educational Administration55(2): 186–206.
122.
RainesPL, 2012. The role of the high school principal in improving student learning and achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Regent University, Virginia.
123.
ReynoldsDMuijsD (2016) Leading effective pedagogy. In: HarrisAJonesM (eds) Leading Futures: Global Perspectives on Educational Leadership. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications, 205–221.
124.
RobinsinVHohepaMLyoydC (2009) School Leadership and Student Outcomes: Identifying What Works and Why. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Education.
125.
RobinsonVMLloydCARoweKJ (2008) The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly44(5): 635–674.
126.
RossJAGrayP (2006) School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue Canadienne de L'éducation29(3): 798–822. https://doi.org/10.2307/20054196.
127.
SchleicherA (2018) Valuing Our Teachers and Raising Their Status: How Communities can Help, International Summit on the Teaching Profession. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264292697-en.
128.
SchynsBSchillngJ (2013) How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly24(1): 138–158.
129.
ShenJWuHReevesP, et al. (2020) The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review31: 100357.
130.
SingelisTMTriandisHCBhawukDP, et al. (1995) Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-cultural Research29(3): 240–275.
131.
SismanM (2016) Factors related to instructional leadership perception and effect of instructional leadership on organizational variables: A meta-analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice16(5): 1761–1787.
SpillaneJP (2006) Distributed Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
134.
SpillaneJPHalversonRDiamondJB (2004) Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies36(1): 3–34.
135.
SteersRMSanchez-RundeCJNardonL (2010) Management across Cultures: Challenges and Strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
136.
SunJLeithwoodK (2012) Transformational school leadership effects on student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools11(4): 418–451.
137.
TanCYDimmockCWalkerA (2024) How school leadership practices relate to student outcomes: Insights from a three-level meta-analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership52(1): 6–27.
138.
TanCYGaoLShiM (2022) Second-order meta-analysis synthesizing the evidence on associations between school leadership and different school outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership50(3): 469–490.
139.
TindleJA, 2012. Dimensions of principal support behaviors and their relationship to organizational citizenship behaviors and student achievement in high schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.
140.
TriandisHC (1995) Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
141.
TriandisHCGelfandMJ (1998) Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74(1): 118.
142.
TriandisHCKurowskiLLGelfandMJ (1994) Workplace diversity. In: TriandisHCDunnetteMDHoughLM (eds) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, C. 4. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, 769–827.
143.
TroutmanLD, 2012. The impact of principal leadership on school culture and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Wingate University, Wingate, NC.
144.
UrickABowersA (2014) The impact of principal perception on student academic climate and achievement in high school: How does it measure up?Journal of School Leadership24(2): 386–414.
145.
UysalSSarierY (2018) Meta-analysis of school leadership effects on student achievement in USA and Turkey. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences13(4): 590–603.
146.
von ElmEMAltmanDGEggerM, et al. (2014) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine147(8): 573–577.
147.
WalkerADimmockCA (2002) School Leadership and Administration: Adopting a Cultural Perspective. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
148.
WalkerAHallingerP (2015) A synthesis of reviews of research on principal leadership in east Asia. Journal of Educational Administration55(4): 554–570.
149.
WampoldBEAhnHKimD (2000) Meta-analysis in the social sciences. Asia Pacific Education Review1: 67–74.
150.
WitziersBBoskerRJKrügerML (2003) Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly39(3): 398–425.
151.
York-BarrJDukeK (2004) What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research74(3): 255–316.
152.
YuklG (2013) Leadership in Organizations, 8th Edition Pearson.
153.
Zhao (2018) Understanding Principal’s Instructional Leadership: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis in China. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing Group.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
