There is currently considerable interest in system leadership and how it can support school change at scale. System leadership aims to move learning beyond school boundaries through leveraging experience and expertise. The success of system leadership depends on how key educational players can move effectively between and across traditional educational boundaries. China's education system has long-established system infrastructure to support boundary spanning. This paper presents three selected different types of system leaders who span across boundaries to build relationships, interconnections and interdependencies to enhance collective teacher capacity across their systems. The paper argues that working in a centralised, top-down system creates enabling conditions which facilitate boundary practices. It further suggests that such conditions form tensions which risk reproducing static systems when leadership is enacted hierarchically. Enabling conditions include established routines, roles and values which empower boundary spanners to leverage their expertise. System tensions can arise between the centre and periphery, between responsibility and professional power and between diversity and homogeneity.
AinscowMChapmanCHadfieldM (2019) Changing Education Systems: A Research-based Approach. London: Routledge.
2.
AkkermanSFAdmiraalWSimonsRJ (2012) Unity and diversity in a collaborative research project. Culture & Psychology18(2): 227–252.
3.
AkkermanSFBakkerA (2011) Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research81(2): 132–169.
4.
BoylanM (2016) Deepening system leadership: teachers leading from below. Educational Management Administration & Leadership4(1): 57–72.
5.
BryantDWalkerA (2022) Principal-designed structures that enhance middle leaders' professional learning. Educational Management Administration & Leadership10: 1177/17411432221084154.
6.
CarterA (2016) Empowering middle leaders: Trends in school leadership research on the principal's impact on school effectiveness. Australian Educational Leader38(1): 37–41.
7.
ChapmanC (2015) From one school to many: Reflections on the impact and nature of school federations and chains in England. Educational Management Administration and Leadership43(1): 46–60.
8.
ChengKM (2010) Shanghai And Hong Kong: Two distinct examples of education reform in China. In: OECD (ed) Stronger Performers and Successful Performers in Education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. Paris: OECD, pp.83–115.
9.
CoburnCE (2003) Rethinking scale: moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher32(6): 3–12.
10.
CoburnCERussellJL (2008) District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis30(3): 203–235.
11.
CohenDKSpillaneJPPeurachDJ (2018) The dilemmas of educational reform. Educational Researcher47(3): 204–212.
12.
ColdrenAFSpillaneJP (2007) Making connections to teaching practice: the role of boundary practices in instructional leadership. Educational Policy21(2): 369–396.
13.
CravensXWangJ (2017) Learning from the masters: Shanghai’s teacher-expertise infusion system. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies6(4): 306–320.
14.
DimmockC (2016) System leadership for school improvement: a developing concept and set of practices. Scottish Educational Review48(2): 60–79.
15.
DominaTLewisRAgarwalP, et al. (2015) Professional sense-makers: instructional specialist in contemporary schooling. Educational Researcher44(6): 259–364.
16.
EngeströmYEngeströmRKärkkäinenM (1995) Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. In: Learning and Instruction. Netherlands: Elsevier Science, pp. 319–336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(95)00021-6
17.
FullanM (2009) Large-scale reform comes of age. Journal of Educational Change10: 101–113.
18.
FullanM (2010) All Systems Go: The Change Imperative for Whole System Reform. Corwin: Ontario Principals’ Council.
19.
FullanMHargreavesA (2015) Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
GallucciCvan LareMDVYoonIH, et al. (2010) Instructional coaching: building theory about the role and organizational support for professional learning. American Educational Research Journal47(4): 919–963.
21.
HaironSTanC (2017) Professional learning communities in Singapore and Shanghai: implications for teacher collaboration. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education47(1): 91–104.
22.
HarrisA (2003) Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: heresy, fantasy or possibility?School Leadership and Management23(3): 313–324.
23.
HighamRHopkinsDMatthewsP (2009) System Leadership in Practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
24.
HoJKangTShaariI (2021) Leading from the middle: vice-principals in Singapore as boundary spanners. Journal of Educational Administration59(2): 145–161.
25.
HopkinsDStringfieldSHarrisA, et al. (2014) School and system improvement: a narrative state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement25(2): 257–281.
26.
JensenB (2012) Learning from the Best School Systems in Asia. Australia: Grattan Report.
27.
JensenBSonnemannJBoberts-HullK, et al. (2016) Beyond PD: Teacher Professional Learning in High-performing Systems. Washington, DC: National Centre on Education and Economy.
28.
LiangXKidwaiHZhangM, et al. (2016) How Shanghai Does It: Insights and Lessons from the Highest-Ranking Education System in the World. World Bank Publications.
29.
LiuSHallingerPFengD (2016) Learning-centered leadership and teacher learning in China: does trust matter?Journal of Educational Administration54: 661–682.
30.
PaineL (1990) The teacher as virtuoso: a Chinese model for teaching. Teachers College Record92(1): 49–81.
31.
QianHYWalkerA (2019) Reconciling top-down policy intent with internal accountability: The role of Chinese school principals. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability31: 495–517.
32.
QianHYWalkerA (2020) System reform in China: Mobilising and sharing resources across schools. In: HarrisAJones MS (eds) Leading and Transforming Education Systems: Evidence, Insights, Critiques and Reflections. Singapore: Springer, 33–46.
33.
QianHYWalkerA (2021) System leadership for promoting collective responsibility and communities of learners: Insights from China. In: Brown SDuignan P (eds) Leading Education System. Emerald Publishing Limited, 87–110.
34.
RobertsonJ (2009) Coaching leadership learning through partnership. School Leadership and Management29(1): 39–49.
35.
SchoenhalsM (1993) The paradox of power in a People’s Republic of China middle school. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
36.
SheppardBBrownJDibbonD (2009) School District Leadership Matters. New York: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
37.
ShererJZSpillaneJP (2011) Constancy and change in work practice in schools: the role of organizational routines. Teachers College Record113(3): 611–657.
38.
SpillaneJP (2009) Managing to lead: reframing school leadership and management. Phi Delta Kappan91(3): 70–73.
39.
SpillaneJPHopkinsMSweetTM (2018) School district educational infrastructure and change at scale: teacher peer interactions and their beliefs about mathematics instruction. American Educational Research Journal55(3): 532–571.
40.
SpillaneJPShirrellMHopkinsM (2016) Designing and deploying a professional learning community (PLC) organizational routine: bureaucratic and collegial arrangements in tandem. Le Travail Collectif Des Enseignants35: 97–122.
41.
StarSL (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and het erogeneous distributed problem solving. In: GasserLHuhnsM (eds) Distributed Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo, CA: Mo, pp.37–54.
42.
StarSLGriesemerJR (1989) Institutional ecology, “translations” and bound ary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science19(3): 387–420.
43.
SuchmanL (1994) Working relations of technology production and use. Computer Supported Cooperative Work2: 21–39.
44.
SunY, 2019. Teachers in the People’s Republic of China: A study on authoritarian professionalism. PhD Thesis, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
45.
TanC (2013) Learning from Shanghai: Lessons on Achieving Educational Success. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science + Business Media.
46.
TehLHoganDDimmockC (2013) Knowledge mobilisation and utilisation in the Singapore education system: the nexus between researchers. In: LevinBQiJEdelstein H (eds) The Impact of Research in Education: An International Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press, 41–64.
47.
TohYJamaludinAHungWLD, et al. (2014) Ecological leadership: going beyond system leadership for diffusing school-based innovations in the crucible of change for 21st century learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher23(4): 835–850.
48.
WakehamM, 2016. Boundary spanning leadership in families of schools in a school system. PhD Thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada.
49.
WalkerAQianH Y (2018a) Deciphering Chinese School Leadership: Conceptualisations, Context and Complexities. London: Routledge.
50.
WalkerAQianH Y (2018b) Exploring the mysteries of school success in Shanghai. ECNU Review of Education1(1): 119–133.
51.
WalkerDNoconH (2007) Boundary-crossing competence: theoretical considerations and educational design. Mind, Culture, and Activity14(3): 178–195.
52.
WengerE (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
WilliamsP (2011) The life and times of the boundary spanner. Journal of Integrated Care19(3): 26–33.
54.
ZengYLoLN (2023) Leading as boundary crossing: how teacher leaders lead across a professional learning network in Shanghai China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership51(6): 1383–1400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211055329.
55.
ZhengXYeJ (2024) Teacher leadership for professional development in a networked learning community: a Chinese case study. Educational Management Administration & Leadership52(5): 1062–1081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221121224.
56.
ZhengXYinHWangX (2021) Doing authentic research” with artifacts to facilitate teacher learning across multiple communities. Teaching and Teacher Education105: 103394.
