Instructional Boundary Management is an area of school leadership comprising activities that simultaneously involve instructional leadership and boundary management. This study explores principals’ Instructional Boundary Management during COVID-19. Data collection consisted of semi-structured interviews with a diverse sample of 33 Israeli elementary school principals. Data analysis indicated that principals felt an increasing need to carry out most Instructional Boundary Management activities during COVID-19. The findings suggest that COVID-19 influenced principals’ needs through the following three factors: the challenges that COVID-19 posed to teachers, the challenges that COVID-19 posed to students and parents, and the transition from face-to-face instruction to distance learning. These findings reveal the mechanisms through which COVID-19 affected Instructional Boundary Management activities, explaining how and why COVID-19 has led to a greater need for principals’ Instructional Boundary Management.
ArnoldBRahimiMRileyP (2021) Working through the first year of the pandemic: A snapshot of Australian school leaders’ work roles and responsibilities and health and wellbeing during covid-19. Journal of Educational Administration and History53(3–4): 301–309.
2.
BeauchampGHulmeMClarkeL, Hamilton L and Harvey J (2021) 'People miss people': A study of school leadership and management in the four nations of the United Kingdom in the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(3): 375–392.
3.
BenolielP (2017) Managing school management team boundaries and school improvement: An investigation of the school leader role. International Journal of Leadership in Education20(1): 57–86.
4.
BenolielP (2020) Managers as boundary spanners and school violence: The mediating role of school management teams. Educational Management and Administration Leadership48(2): 286–304.
5.
BenolielPSomechA (2018) A new perspective for understanding the role of school managers: The impact of principals’ boundary activities on the effectiveness of school management team. Teachers College Record120(3): 1–40.
BushT (2021) Leading through COVID-19: Managing a crisis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(3): 373–374.
8.
CaffynR (2013) Boundaries and boundary management in international schools: Psychodynamics and organizational politics. In: PearceR (ed) International Education and Schools: Moving Beyond the First 40 Years. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 205–221.
9.
Capstones – The Israel Institute for School Leadership (2008) Perception of the principal's role in the State of Israel: Report by the Professional Committee to Formulate Policy Recommendations for the Ministry of Education. Jerusalem, Israel: Avney Rosha.
10.
DornEHancockBSarakatsannisJ, Viruleg E. (2020) COVID-19 and Student Learning in the United States: The Hurt Could Last a Lifetime. New York, NY: McKinsey & Company.
11.
DruskatVWheelerJV (2003) Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal46(4): 435–457.
12.
GedikSBellibasMS (2015) Examining schools’ distributed instructional leadership capacity: Comparison of elementary and secondary schools. Journal of Education and Training Studies3(6): 101–110.
13.
GlickmanCDGordonSPRoss-GordonJM (2017) Supervision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach, 10th ed.New York, NY: Pearson.
14.
GrissomJACondonL (2021) Leading schools and districts in times of crisis. Educational Researcher50(5): 315–324.
15.
HallingerP (2012) A data-driven approach to assess and develop instructional leadership with the PIMRS. In: ShenJ (ed) Tools for Improving Principals’ Work. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 47–69.
16.
HallingerP (2018) Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership46(1): 5–24.
17.
HallingerPGümüşSBellibaşMŞ (2020) 'Are principals instructional leaders yet?': A science map of the knowledge base on instructional leadership, 1940–2018. Scientometrics122(3): 1629–1165.
18.
HallingerPWangWC (2015) Assessing Instructional Leadership with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
19.
HarrisA (2020) COVID-19: School leadership in crisis?Journal of Professional Capital and Community5(3/4): 321–326.
20.
HarrisAJonesM (2021) COVID 19: School leadership in disruptive times. School Leadership & Management40(4): 243–247.
KeleşHNAtayDKaranfılF (2020) Instructional leadership behaviors of school principals during the COVID 19 pandemic process. Milli Egitim49(1): 155–174.
24.
KohansalR (2015) Public school principals: Agents of bridging and buffering. Journal of School Leadership25(4): 621–658.
25.
KvaleSBrinkmannS (2009) Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Le FevreDMRobinsonVMJ (2015) The interpersonal challenges of instructional leadership: Principals’ effectiveness in conversations about performance issues. Educational Administration Quarterly51(1): 58–95.
27.
LiuSHallingerP (2018) Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly54(4): 501–528.
28.
LiuYBellibaşMŞGümüşS (2021) The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(3): 430–453.
29.
LouisKSLeithwoodKWahlstromKL and Anderson SE (2010) Investigating the Links to Improved Student Learning: Final Report of Research Findings. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
30.
McLeodSDulskyS (2021) Resilience, reorientation, and reinvention: School leadership during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Education6: 1–13.
31.
MerriamSBTisdellEJ (2016) Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, 4th ed.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
MilesMBHubermanMASaldañaJ (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
MillerPW (2018) The Nature of School Leadership: Global Practice Perspectives. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
MurphyJNeumerskiCMGoldringE, Grissom J and Porter A (2016) Bottling fog? The quest for instructional management. Cambridge Journal of Education46(4): 455–471.
35.
NetolickyDM (2020) School leadership during a pandemic: Navigating tensions. Journal of Professional Capital and Community5(3/4): 391–395.
36.
NetsM (2017) Professional development of school principals in the pilot program of 'Pedagogical flexibility': the Israeli case. Economics and Culture14(2): 12–21.
37.
NeumerskiCMGrissomJAGoldringE, Rubin M, Cannata M, Schuermann P and Drake TA (2018) Restructuring instructional leadership: How multiple-measure teacher evaluation systems are redefining the role of the school principal. The Elementary School Journal119(2): 270–297.
38.
OplatkaILapidotA (2018) Novice principals’ perceptions of their mentoring process in early career stage: the key role of mentor-protégé relations. Journal of Educational Administration and History50(3): 204–222.
39.
OrtlippM (2008) Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report13(4): 695–705.
40.
ParkJHamS (2016) Whose perception of principal instructional leadership? Principal-teacher perceptual (dis)agreement and its influence on teacher collaboration. Asia Pacific Journal of Education36(3): 450–469.
41.
PollockK (2020) School leaders’ work during the COVID-19 pandemic: A two-pronged approach. International Studies in Education48(3): 38–44.
42.
RigbyJG (2014) Three logics of instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly50(4): 610–644.
43.
RobinsonVMJ (2010) From instructional leadership to leadership capabilities: Empirical findings and methodological challenges. Leadership and Policy in Schools9(1): 1–26.
44.
SaldañaJOmastaM (2018) Qualitative Research: Analyzing Life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
SchleicherA (2020) The Impact of COVID-19 on Education: Insights from Education at a Glance 2020. Paris, France: OECD.
46.
SebastianJAllensworthEHuangH (2016) The role of teacher leadership in how principals influence classroom instruction and student learning. American Journal of Education123(1): 69–108.
47.
ShakedHBenolielP (2020) Instructional boundary management: The complementarity of instructional leadership and boundary management. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership48(5): 821–839.
48.
ShakedHBenolielPHallingerP (2021) How national context indirectly influences instructional leadership implementation: The case of Israel. Educational Administration Quarterly57(3): 437–469.
49.
ShakedHSchechterC (2017) School principals as mediating agents in education reforms. School Leadership and Management37(1-2): 19–37.
50.
SomechANaamnehM (2019) Subject coordinators as boundary managers: The impact on team learning and organizational outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership47(1): 56–73.
ThorntonK (2021) Leading through COVID-19: New Zealand secondary principals describe their reality. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(3): 393–409.
53.
VarelaDGFedynichL (2020) Leading schools from a social distance: Surveying South Texas school district leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal38(4): 1–10.
