The concept of toxic leadership has been widely investigated in diverse settings with most contributors agreeing its impact on followers can have negative effects to the victim's well-being, job satisfaction, group productivity and organisational commitment. However, the concept has not yet been sufficiently researched in tertiary educational settings, and in this case, specifically in Chilean higher education. This paper explores whether toxic leadership was present in country's universities and, if so, to assess its impact over academics’ work engagement. A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted, using a sample of 592 academics from two different Chilean universities, who voluntarily responded to two validated scales: One to measure toxic leadership perceptions (Schmidt's toxic leadership scale) and other one to measure work engagement (UWESR work engagement scale). The results corroborated the presence of toxic leadership in the consulted institutions, but a significant relationship between this style of leadership and work engagement was not established. This finding suggests that, even though the participants recognise the presence of toxic leadership, work engagement was not necessarily affected by their leader's behaviour.
AlonderieneRMajauskaiteM (2016) Leadership style and job satisfaction in higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Management30(1): 140–164.
2.
AravenaF (2019) Destructive leadership behavior: An exploratory study in Chile. Leadership and Policy in Schools18(1): 83–96.
3.
AshourianPLoewensteinY (2011) Bayesian Inference underlies the contraction bias in delayed comparison tasks. PLoS ONE6(5): e19551.
4.
BakkerASchaufeliWLeiterMTarisT (2008) Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress22(3): 187–200.
5.
BellR (2017) The Dysfunction Junction: The Impact of Toxic Leadership on Follower Effectiveness. Doctor of Philosophy in Organizational Leadership Dissertation, Regent University.
6.
BendermacherGEgbrinkMWolfhagenIDolmasD (2017) Unravelling quality culture in higher education: A realist review. High Education73: 39–60.
7.
BlaséJBlaséJ (2002) The dark side of leadership: teacher perspectives of principal mistreatment. Educational Administration Quarterly38(5): 671–727.
8.
British Educational Research Association (2018) Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research, fourth edition. [online] Available at: https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/publications/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018.
CraigI (2017) Toxic leadership. In: EarleyPGreanyT (eds) School Leadership and Education System Reform. London: Bloomsbury, pp.182–190.
12.
de BruinGHennC (2013) Dimensionality of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES–9). Psychological Reports112(3): 788–799.
13.
DuffyRDikBStegerM (2011) Calling and work-related outcomes: Career commitment as a mediator. Journal of Vocational Behavior78: 210–218.
14.
FahieD (2020) The lived experience of toxic leadership in Irish higher education. International Journal of Workplace Health Management13(3): 341–355.
15.
FeldgesTMaleTPalaiologouIBurwoodS (2015) The quest to re-energise academic staff in higher education in an age of performativity. E-journal of the British Education Studies Association7(1): 3–17.
16.
FitzgibbonsK (2018) The Relation Between Toxic Leadership and Organizational Climate: An Investigation into the Existence of Toxic Leadership within an Organization and the Effects those Toxic Elements have on Organizational Climate. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, Indiana Institute of Technology.
17.
GuerreroP (2007) Estructura organizacional de las universidades en Chile. Oikos23: 7–33.
18.
HadadianZSayadpourZ (2018) Relationship between toxic leadership and job related affective well-being: The mediating role of job stress. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences7(1): 137–145.
19.
HargreavesAFullanM (2012) Professional Capital. Transforming Teaching in Every School. New York: Routledge.
20.
HoganRHoganJ (2001) Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment9: 40–51.
21.
KrasikovaDGreenSLeBretonJ (2013) Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management39(5): 1308–1338.
22.
LarssonGHyllengrenP (2013) Contextual influences on leadership in emergency type organisations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis21(1): 19–37.
23.
Lipman-BlumenJ (2005) The Allure of Toxic Leaders: Why We Follow Destructive Bosses and Corrupt Politicians – and How We can Survive Them. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
MehtaSMaheshwariG (2013) Consequence of toxic leadership on employee job satisfaction and organizational commitment. The Journal- Contemporary Management Research8(2): 1–23.
25.
MillsMCulbertsonSFullagarC (2011) Conceptualizing and measuring engagement: An analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Journal of Happiness Studies13: 519–545.
26.
OECD (2013) Reviews of National Policies for Education: Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Chile 2013. OECD Publishing. [Online] Available at: http://dx.doi.org/9789264190597-en
27.
OplatkaI (2017) Irresponsible leadership and unethical practices in schools: A conceptual framework of the ‘dark side’ of educational leadership. Advances in Educational Administration26: 1–18.
28.
OzerOUgurluogluOKahramanGAvciK (2017) A study on toxic leadership perceptions of healthcare workers. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal9(1): 12–23.
29.
PadillaAHoganRKaiserB (2007) The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly18: 176–194.
30.
PelletierK (2010) Leadership toxicity: An empirical investigation of toxic behaviour and rhetoric. Leadership6(4): 373–389.
31.
PelletierK (2012) Perceptions of and reactions to leader toxicity: Do leader-follower relationships and identification with victim matter?The Leadership Quarterly23: 412–424.
32.
ScharagerJ (2018) Quality in higher education: The view of quality assurance managers in Chile. Quality in Higher Education24(2): 102–116.
SchaufeliWBakkerASalanovaM (2006) The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement66: 701–716.
35.
SchaufeliWSlanovaMGonzalez-RomáV, et al (2002) The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies3: 71–92.
36.
SchmidtA (2008) Development and Validation of the Toxic Leadership Scale. Master of Science Dissertation, University of Maryland.
37.
SchmidtA (2014) An Examination of Toxic Leadership, Job Outcomes, and the Impact of Military Deployment. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, University of Maryland.
38.
SinghNDevSSengutpaS (2017) Perceived toxicity in leaders: Through the demographic lens of subordinates. Procedia Computer Science122: 114–121.
39.
SistoV (2018) Managerialismo, autoritarismo y la lucha por el alma de la gestión: el caso de las últimas reformas en políticas de dirección escolar en Chile. Rev FAEEBA27(53): 141–156.
40.
SmithNFredricks-LowmanI (2020) Conflict in the workplace: A 10-year review of toxic leadership in higher education. International Journal of Leadership in Education23(5): 538–551.
41.
WatersJ (2018) The toxic university: Zombie leadership, academic rock stars, and neoliberal ideology. British Journal of Sociology of Education39(5): 729–732.
42.
WebsterVBroughPDalyK (2014) Fight, flight or freeze: Common responses for follower coping with toxic leadership. Stress and Health32: 346–354.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
