Inquiry-based working contributes to teacher professionalization and educational improvements. This article presents the key findings of a qualitative case study carried out in three primary schools in the Netherlands. That study focused on the inquiry-based working of school boards, school leaders and teachers, with the goal of better understanding how schools establish an inquiry-based culture. As a follow-up to a nationwide survey, this case study used semi-structured interviews, observations and document analysis to gain insight into the interplay between school boards, school leaders and teachers regarding inquiry-based working. It identified multiple ways in which educators can encourage others to work in an inquiry-based manner. These approaches are not only top-down (i.e., from school board to school leader, and from school leader to teacher) but also bottom-up (i.e., from teacher to school leader, and from school leader to school board).
AndersonSLeithwoodKStraussT (2010) Leading data use in schools: organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and Policy in Schools9(3): 292–327.
2.
BallSJ (2003) The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy18(2): 215–228.
3.
BallSJ (2012) The making of a neoliberal academic. Research in Secondary Education2(1): 29–31.
4.
BiestaGJJ (2010) Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
5.
BiestaGJJ (2011) From Learning Cultures to Educational Cultures: Values and Judgements in Educational Research and Educational Improvement. International Journal of Early Childhood43(3): 199–210.
6.
CainTHarrisR (2013) Teachers’ action research in a culture of performativity. Educational Action Research21(3): 343–358.
7.
CampbellCLevinB (2009) Using data to support educational improvement. educational assessment, evaluation and accountability. Formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education21(1): 47–65.
8.
DalyAJ (2012) Data, dyads, and dynamics: Exploring data use and social networks in educational improvement. Teachers College Record114(11): 1–38.
9.
DatnowAParkVKennedy-LewisB (2013) Affordances and constraints in the context of teacher collaboration for the purpose of data use. Journal of Educational Administration51(3): 341–362.
10.
EarlLKatzS (2006) Leading Schools in a Data-Rich World. Harnessing Data for School Improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
11.
GeijselFPSleegersJCStoelRD. (2009) The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal109(4): 406–427.
12.
HarrisAJonesM (2010) Professional learning communities and system improvement. Improving schools13(2): 172–181.
HoogeEHoninghM (2014) Are School Boards aware of the educational quality of their schools?Educational Management Administration & Leadership42(4S): 139–154.
15.
HordSMSommersWA (2008) Leading Professional Learning Communities: Voices from Research and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
16.
IkemotoGSMarshJA (2007) Cutting through the “Data-Driven” Mantra: Different Conceptions of Data-Driven Decision Making. In: MossPA (ed) Evidence and Decision Making, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 105–131.
17.
JacksonSFarndaleEKakabadseA (2003) Executive development: meeting the needs of top teams and boards. Journal of Management Development22(3): 185–265.
18.
JimersonJB (2014) Thinking about data: Exploring the development of mental models for “data use” among teachers and school leaders. Studies in Educational Evaluation42: 5–14.
19.
KrügerML (2010) Leading Schools in the Knowledge Society: On the Way to Leaders of Learning in Inquiry-Based Schools. In: NormoreAH (ed) Global Perspectives on Educational Leadership Reform. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, p. 397–417.
20.
KrügerMLGeijselFP (2011) The effect of school leadership on teachers’ inquiry habit of mind. In: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, 8–12 April 2001. Washington, D.C: American Education Research Association.
21.
LachatMASmithS (2005) Practices that support data use in urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk10(3): 333–349.
22.
LaddHFFiskeEB (2011) Weighted student funding in the Netherlands: A model for the US?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management30(3): 470–498.
23.
LeeMSeashore LouisKAndersonS (2012) Local education authorities and student learning: the effects of policies and practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement23(2): 133–158.
24.
LevinJADatnowA (2012) The principal role in data-driven decision making: Using case-study data to develop multi-mediator models of educational reform. School Effectiveness and School Improvement23(2): 179–201.
25.
LewisCPerryRMurataA (2006) How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational researcher35(3): 3–14.
26.
MandinachEBGummerES (2013) A systemic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educational Researcher42(1): 30–37.
27.
MarshJAFarrellCC (2014) How leaders can support teachers with data-driven decision making A framework for understanding capacity building. Educational Management Administration & Leadership43(2): 269–289.
28.
MilesMBHubermanAMSaldañaJ (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (2007) Scholen voor morgen. Samen op weg naar duurzame kwaliteit in het primair onderwijs. Kwaliteitsagenda Primair Onderwijs. [Schools for tomorrow. Together towards sustainable quality in primary education. Quality Agenda Primary Education]. Den Haag: Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap.
30.
MurrayJ (2012) Performativity cultures and their effects on teacher educators’ work. Research in Teacher Education2(2): 19–23.
31.
O’ReillyCACaldwellDFChatmanJA. (2010) How leadership matters: the effects of leaders’ alignment on strategy implementation. Leadership Quarterly21(1): 104–113.
32.
ParkVDatnowA (2009) Co-constructing distributed leadership: District and school connections in data-driven decision-making. School leadership and Management29(5): 477–494.
33.
RobinsonVLaiMK (2006) Practitioner Research for Educators: A Guide to Improving Classrooms and Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
34.
SarrosJCSarrosAMCooperBK. (2016) Board and senior management alignment on school strategy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership44(3): 451–466.
35.
SchildkampKEhrenMLaiMK (2012) Editorial article for the special issue on data-based decision making around the world: from policy to practice to results. School Effectiveness and School Improvement23(2): 123–131.
36.
SchildkampKKuiperW (2010) Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education26(3): 482–496.
37.
SchildkampKPoortmanC (2015) Factors influencing the functioning of data teams. Teachers college record117(4): 1–42.
38.
Uiterwijk-LuijkLKrügerMZijlstraB. (2017a) The Relationship between Psychological Factors and Inquiry-based Working by Primary School Teachers. Educational Studies43(2): 147–164.
39.
Uiterwijk-LuijkLKrügerMZijlstraB. (2017b) Inquiry-based leadership: the influence of attitude, experienced social pressure and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Administration55(5): 492–509.
40.
Van der RijstRMKijneJWVerloopN. (2008) Exploring scientific research disposition from the perspective of academics. In: Annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD, 30 March–2 April 2008. Reston, VA: NARST.
41.
Van der Wal - MarisSJSchellingsGLMGeldensJJM. (2015) Academic primary teacher education: a powerful learning environment for fostering meaning-oriented learning?Paper presented at 16th Biennial EARLI Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Limassol, Cyprus.
42.
VanhoofJVanlommelKThijsS. (2014) Data use by Flemish school principals: impact of attitude, self-efficacy and external expectations. Educational Studies40(1): 48–62.
43.
VoogtJRoblinNP (2012) A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies44(3): 299–321.
44.
WaymanJC (2013) Leading data use: Pre-service courses for principals and superintendents. The Journal of Educational Research & Policy Studies13(2): 6–13.
45.
WaymanJCJimersonJBChoV (2012) Organizational considerations in establishing the data-informed district. School Effectiveness and School Improvement23(2): 159–178.
46.
WaymanJCStringfieldS (2006) Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education112(4): 549–571.
47.
WohlstetterPDatnowAParkV (2008) Creating a system for data-driven decision-making: Applying the principal-agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement19(3): 239–259.
48.
YinRK (2012) Applications of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
