Improving school administration through information technology? How digitalisation changes the bureaucratic features of public school administration

Abstract

Digital media and digital data processing have substantially influenced public institutions in recent years and changed their efficiency, effectiveness and organisational set-up (nature of organisations). Based on Fountain’s Technology Enactment Framework (TEF), this paper argues that, firstly, in a circular process, digital requirements transform the bureaucratic features of school organisation, and that the effects of digital technologies on the performance and efficiency of schools as bureaucratic organisations are ambivalent. We use interview data from a sample of 51% of the head teachers of vocational school centres in the jurisdiction of Bavaria in order to substantiate these assumptions by means of structured qualitative analysis. Email technology seems particularly significant from a quantitative perspective. Indications for the transformative nature of objective digital technologies with regard to the school bureaucracies can be found for all bureaucratic categories under consideration in this analysis, particularly for the feature ‘standardisation’. The examples presented here seem to highlight that gains in efficiency or reductions of losses in efficiency caused by digitalisation are mostly caused by the concrete use of digital technology within the respective school organisation.

Keywords

Administration schools management leadership digitalisation technology enactment framework information technology Max Weber bureaucracy vocational

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arthur

(1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal 99(394): 116–131.

Bretschneider

(2003) Information technology, e-government and institutional change. Public Administration Review 63(6): 738–741.

Cusick

(1992) The Educational System. Its Nature and its Logic. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Fountain

(2001) Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Fountain

(2005) Central Issues in the Political Development of the Virtual State. In: Castells

Cardoso

(eds.) The Network Society. From Knowledge to Policy. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations. pp. 149–183.

Fulmer

(1995) Maximizing the potential of information technology for management. Strategies for interfacing the technological core of education. In Barta

B-Z

Telem

Gev

(eds.) Information technology in educational management. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 3–8.

Gerholz

K-H

Dormann

(2017) Ausbildung 4.0: Didaktische Gestaltung der betrieblich beruflichen Ausbildung in Zeiten der digitalen Transformation. bwp@Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik 32: 1–22.

Grafton

(2003) ‘Shadow theories’ in Fountain’s theory of technology enactment. Social Science Computer Review 21(4): 411–416.

Hartley

(2016) Economic crisis, technology and the management of education. The case of distributed leadership. Educational Management Administraion and Leadership 44: 173–183.

10.

Hornung

Schnabel

(2009) Data protection in Germany I: The population census decision and the right to informational self-determination. Computer Law & Security Review 25: 84–88.

11.

Mayring

(2008) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken, 10th ed. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.

12.

Newton

(2016) The National College for School Leadership. Its role in developing leaders. In: Brundrett

Smith

(eds) Leadership in education. London: Sage, pp. 90–100.

13.

Prokopiadou

(2011) Using information and communication technologies in school administration. Researching Greek kindergarden schools. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 40: 305–327.

14.

Saiti

Prokopiadou

(2009) Impact of information and communication technologies on school administration. Research on the Greek schools of secondary education. In: Wimmer

Scholl

Traunmüller

Janssen M

, (eds.) Electronic Government. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference EGOV 2009 in Linz. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 305–316.

15.

Selwyn

(2011a) ‘It’s all about standardisation’. Exploring the digital (re)configuration of school management and administration. Cambridge Journal of Education 41(4): 473–488.

16.

Selwyn

(2011b) Editorial: In praise of pessimism. The need for negativity in educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology 42(5): 713–718.

17.

Selwyn

(2016) ‘There is so much data’. Exploring the realities of data-based school governance. European Educational Research Journal 15(1): 54–68.

18.

Selwyn

Henderson

Chao

(2015) Exploring the role of digital data in contemporary schools and schooling. ‘200,000 lines in an Excel spreadsheet’. British Educational Research Journal 21(5): 767–781.

19.

Wittmann

(2008) Align, don’t necessarily follow. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 36: 33–54.

20.

Wittmann

Dormann

(2014) Bürokratisierung als Regelfall? Eine Interviewstudie zur Umsetzung externer Anforderungen in beruflichen Schulzentren. bwp@ Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik – online 25: 1–22.

21.

Weber

(1980) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Studienausgabe. Besorgt von J. Winkelmann. 5., rev. Aufl. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. (Original 1922).

22.

Yildiz

(2007) E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly 24: 646–665.