Instructional leadership can be explained as an educational leadership approach whereby the school principal engages in a wide range of activities aiming to improve teaching and learning for all students. A recent meta-analysis found that female principals engaged in more active instructional leadership than male counterparts. The current qualitative study sought to understand this gender gap. Data were collected through 59 semi-structured interviews with 36 female principals and 23 male principals from Israel. Data analysis was a four-stage process – condensing, coding, categorizing, and theorizing. Findings showed that female participants, more frequently than their male counterparts, reported possessing two capabilities that are necessary for instructional leadership: (1) instructional expertise; (2) attention to relationships. Gender theories are employed to explain these findings. Practical implications and further research are discussed.
AlsobaieMF (2015) The principal’s relationship with teacher and development literacy of elementary school students. Journal of Education and Practice6(35): 149–155.
2.
BarbutoJFritzSMatkinGMarzD (2007) Effects of gender, education, and age upon leaders’ use of influence tactics and full range leadership behaviors. Sex Roles56(1-2): 71–83.
3.
BenDavid-HadarI (2016) School finance policy and social justice. International Journal of Educational Development46: 166–174.
4.
BlaseJBlaseJ (2004) Handbook of Instructional Leadership: How Successful Principals Promote Teaching and Learning. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
5.
BlaseJKirbyP (2009) Bringing out the Best in Teachers: What Effective Principals do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
6.
BothaRJ (2013) Time management abilities of school principals according to gender: A case study in selected Gauteng schools. Africa Education Review10(2): 364–380.
BrenninkmeyerLDSpillaneJP (2008) Problem-solving processes of expert and typical school principals: A quantitative look. School Leadership and Management28(5): 435–468.
9.
Capstones – The Israel Institute for School Leadership (2008) Perception of the Principal’s Role in the State of Israel: Report by The Professional Committee To Formulate Policy Recommendations for the Ministry of Education. Jerusalem, Israel: Avney Rosha.
10.
ChodorowN (1978) The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
11.
ChodorowN (2012) Individualizing Gender and Sexuality: Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
ColemanM (2005) Gender and secondary school leadership. International Studies in Educational Administration33(2): 3–20.
13.
ConnellR (2009) Gender. Malden, MA: Polity.
14.
CreswellJW (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
15.
DiPaolaMFHoyWK (2008) Principals Improving Instruction: Supervision, Evaluation, and Professional Development. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
16.
DonaldsonM (2011) Principals’ Approaches to Developing Teacher Quality. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
17.
DukeD (1987) School Leadership and Instructional Improvement. New York, NY: Random.
18.
EaglyA (2007) Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly31: 1–12.
19.
EdgersonDEKritsonisWAHerringtonD (2006) The critical role of the teacher-principal relationship in the improvement of student achievement in public schools of the United States. Available at: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED491985.pdf(2006, accessed 1 July 2017).
20.
EtheringtonK (2004) Becoming Reflexive Researchers: Using Ourselves in Research. London, UK: Jessica Kingley.
21.
EwyEW (2009) Stakeholder-driven Strategic Planning in Education: A Practical Guide for Developing and Deploying Successful Long-Range Plans. Milwaukee, WI: American Society for Quality.
22.
FlickU (2009) An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
23.
GearyDCByrd-CravenJHoardMKVigilJNumteeC (2003) Evolution and development of boys’ social behavior. Developmental Review23(4): 444–470.
24.
GilliganC (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
25.
GlanzJG (2006) What Every Principal Should Know About Instructional Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
26.
GlickmanCDGordonSPRoss-GordonJM (2014) Supervision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach. 9th ed. London, UK: Pearson.
GoldringEHuffJMayHCamburnE (2008) School context and individual characteristics: What influences principal practice?Journal of Educational Administration46(3): 332–352.
29.
GrissomJALoebSMitaniH (2015) Principal time management skills: Explaining patterns in principals’ time use, job stress, and perceived effectiveness. Journal of Educational Administration53(6): 773–793.
30.
GroganM (2014) Re(considering) gender scholarship in educational leadership. In: MansfieldCKNewcombWS (eds) Women Interrupting, Disrupting, and Revolutionizing Educational Policy and Practice. Charlotte, NC: Information Age, pp.3–20.
31.
GroganMShakeshaftC (2010) Women and Educational Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
HallingerP (2011) A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the principal instructional management rating scale: a lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly47(2): 271–306.
33.
HallingerPMurphyJ (1985) Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal86(2): 217–247.
34.
HallingerPWangWC (2015) Assessing Instructional Leadership with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
35.
HallingerPDongyuLWangWC (2016) Gender differences in instructional leadership: A meta-analytic review of studies using the principal instructional management rating scale. Educational Administration Quarterly. Available at: http://eaq.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/03/15/0013161X16638430.full(accessed 1 July 2017).
36.
HambrickDZOswaldFLDarowskiESRenchTABrouR (2010) Predictors of multitasking performance in a synthetic work paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology24(8): 1149–1167.
37.
HillJOttemRDeRocheJ (2016) Trends in Public and Private School Principal Demographics and Qualifications: 1987-88 to 2011-12. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
38.
HordS (2009) Professional learning communities. Journal of Staff Development30(1): 40–43.
39.
HorngELKlasikDLoebS (2010) Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American Journal of Education116(4): 491–523.
40.
HydeJS (2005) The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist60(6): 581–592.
41.
Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics (2013) Statistical Abstract of Israel (No. 64). Jerusalem: Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics.
42.
KisAKonanN (2014) A meta-analysis of gender differences in terms of teacher views on the instructional leadership behavior of principals. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice14(6): 2139–2145.
43.
KoelschLE (2013) Reconceptualizing the member check interview. International Journal of Qualitative Methods12(1): 168–179.
44.
KowalskiTMcCordRPetersenGYoungIPEllersonN (2011) The American School Superintendent 2010 Decennial Study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
45.
KrügerML (2008) School leadership, sex and gender: Welcome to difference. International Journal of Leadership in Education11(2): 155–168.
46.
Le FevreDMRobinsonVMJ (2015) The interpersonal challenges of instructional leadership: principals’ effectiveness in conversations about performance issues. Educational Administration Quarterly51(1): 58–95.
47.
LochmillerCRAcker-HocevarM (2016) Making sense of principal leadership in content areas: The case of secondary math and science instruction. Leadership and Policy in Schools15(3): 273–296.
48.
LouisKSLeithwoodKWahlstromKLAndersonSE (2010) Investigating the Links to Improved Student Learning: Final Report of Research Findings. Minneapolis–Saint Paul, MN: University of Minnesota.
49.
MarczynskiJCGatesGS (2013) Women secondary principals in Texas 1998 and 2011: Movement toward equity. Journal of Educational Administration51(5): 705–727.
MarshallCWynnS (2012) Expanding the conversation: collaboration, complexities and the missing pieces. Educational Administration Quarterly48(5): 883–892.
52.
MartinJ (2015) Transformational and transactional leadership: An exploration of gender, experience, and institution type. Portal Libraries and the Academy15(2): 331–351.
53.
MartinPY (2003) “Said and done” versus “saying and doing”: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender and Society17(3): 342–366.
54.
MayHSupovitzJA (2011) The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly47(2): 332–352.
55.
MeleroE (2011) Are workplaces with many women in management run differently?Journal of Business Research64: 385–393.
56.
MerriamSB (2009) Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
57.
MilesMBHubermanMASaldañaJ (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
58.
MurphyJTorreD (2014) Creating Productive Cultures in Schools: For Students, Teachers, and Parents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
59.
MurphyJNeumerskiCMGoldringEGrissomJPorterA (2016) Bottling fog? The quest for instructional management. Cambridge Journal of Education46(4): 455–471.
60.
NeumerskiCM (2012) Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here?Educational Administration Quarterly49(2): 310–347.
61.
NoddingsN (1984) Caring: A Feminine Approach To Ethics And Moral Education. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
62.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2011) Society at glance 2011: OECD social indicators. Available at: www.oecd.org/els/social/indicators/SAG(accessed 1 July 2017).
OrtlippM (2008) Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report13(4): 695–705.
66.
PeaseAPeaseB (2003) Why Men can only do One Thing at a Time and Women Never Stop Talking. Bhopal, India: Orion.
67.
PriceHE (2015) Principals’ social interactions with teachers: How principal-teacher social relations correlate with teachers’ perceptions of student engagement. Journal of Educational Administration53(1): 116–139.
68.
RichardsLMorseJM (2013) Readme First for a User’s Guide to Qualitative Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
69.
RigbyJG (2014) Three logics of instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly50(4): 610–644.
70.
RobinsonVMJ (2010) From instructional leadership to leadership capabilities: Empirical findings and methodological challenges. Leadership and Policy in Schools9(1): 1–26.
71.
RobinsonVMJLloydCRoweK (2008) The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly44(5): 564–588.
72.
RoserVBrownMKelseyC (2009) Principal gender as related to campus size, level and academic rating. Advancing Women in Leadership Journal29(10): 2–14.
73.
RossmanGBRallisSF (2012) Learning in the Field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
74.
ShakeshaftC (2006) Gender and educational management. In: SkeltonCFrancisBSmulyanL (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Gender and Education. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp.497–511.
75.
SheppardB (1996) Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership. Alberta Journal of Educational Research42(4): 325–344.
76.
SpillaneJPHarrisAJonesMMertzK (2015) Opportunities and challenges for taking a distributed perspective: Novice school principals’ emerging sense of their new position. British Educational Research Journal41(6): 1068–1085.
77.
SpillaneJPHuntBR (2010) Days of their lives: A mixed-methods, descriptive analysis of the men and women at work in the principal’s office. Journal of Curriculum Studies42(3): 293–331.
78.
SpillaneJPLouisKS (2002) School improvement process and practices: Professional learning for building instructional capacity. In: MurphyJ (ed.) The Educational Leadership Challenge: Redefining Leadership for the 21st Century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, pp.83–104.
79.
SteeleMDJohnsonKROttenSHerbel-EisenmannBACarverCL (2015) Improving instructional leadership through the development of leadership content knowledge: The case of principal learning in algebra. Journal of Research on Leadership Education10(2): 127–150.
StrayerDLMedeiros-WardNWatsonJM (2013) Gender invariance in multitasking: A comment on Mäntylä (2013). Psychological Science24(5): 809–810.
82.
StrongeJHRichardHBCatanoN (2008) Qualities of Effective Principals. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
83.
SupovitzJSirinidesPMayH (2010) How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly46(1): 31–56.
84.
TaylorSLBogdanRDeVaultML (2016) Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
85.
ThoonenEESleegersPJOortFJPeetsmaTT (2012) Building school-wide capacity for improvement: The role of leadership, school organizational conditions, and teacher factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement23(4): 441–460.
VigilJM (2007) Asymmetries in the friendship preferences and social styles of men and women. Human Nature18(2): 143–161.
88.
WalkerJSlearS (2011) The impact of principal leadership behaviors on the efficacy of new and experienced middle school teachers. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin95(1): 46–64.
89.
WoodDR (2007) Teachers’ learning communities: Catalyst for change or a new infrastructure for the status quo?Teachers College Record109(3): 699–739.
