This article is based on the findings of an externally funded, mixed-methods research project conducted at one English university. This small-scale project aimed to examine leadership, barriers to becoming a leader and the support needed to overcome them, from the perspectives of disabled staff. An online questionnaire was sent to all 66 members of staff who had disclosed their disabled status to the university and 22 responses were received. Twelve participants were then interviewed as two focus groups to discuss their views on leadership and its relation to their role. Six more respondents opted for individual face-to-face/telephone interviews. The findings indicated that over half of the respondents were already engaged in ‘formal’ leadership and even more exercised ‘informal’ leadership. This key finding seems to contradict the under-representation of disabled academics in leadership reported in the literature. Despite their engagement in leadership, disabled staff faced several institutional and personal barriers. The findings suggest that having an impairment per se might not necessarily deter disabled staff from exercising leadership. A number of support strategies are recommended to facilitate their participation in (formal) leadership.
ACAS (Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service) (2015) Equality and discrimination: understand the basics. Report, ACAS, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/1Svdu0O(accessed 20 December 2015).
2.
BebbingtonDÖzbilginM (2013) The paradox of diversity in leadership and leadership for diversity. Management International17. Available at: http://bit.ly/1vaSrDT(accessed 20 December 2015).
3.
BERA (British Educational Research Association) (2011) Ethical guidelines for educational research. Available at: http://bit.ly/1PkgWXS(accessed 25 March 2016).
4.
Blue Alumni (2010) Evaluation of the leadership foundation for higher education. Report, HEFCE, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/1zatDD8(accessed 20 December 2015).
5.
BoldenRGoslingJO’BrienAPetersKRyanMHaslamA (2012) Academic leadership: Changing conceptions, identities and experiences in UK higher education. Report, LFHE, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/1PdsNcF(accessed 20 December 2015).
6.
BraunsteinL (2009) It’s not just a job…it’s a career: The Arc of Northern Virginia’s co-executive director program serves as a national model for ‘creative supported employment’. Exceptional Parent39(10): 26–28.
7.
BushT (2006) Theories of educational management. OpenStax-CNX. Available at: http://1.usa.gov/1PvvKTG(accessed 25 March 2016).
8.
BushT (2007) Educational leadership and management: Theory, policy, and practice. South African Journal of Education27(3): 391–406. Available at: http://bit.ly/1WOwtVG(accessed 25 March 2016).
9.
ChinJSanchez-HuclesJ (2007) Diversity and leadership. American Psychologist62(6): 608–609.
10.
CohenLManionLMorrisonK (2011) Research Methods in Education. 7th ed. Oxford: Routledge.
11.
CubanL (1988) The Managerial Imperative and the Practice of Leadership in Schools. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
12.
ECU (Equality Challenge Unit) (2008) Disclosure and support issues for disabled staff in higher education. Report, ECU, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/1hqeVk5(accessed 20 December 2015).
13.
ECU (Equality Challenge Unit) (2009) The impact of the process to promote equality and diversity in the Research Assessment Exercise 2008. Report, ECU, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/1yZ4lEI(accessed 20 December 2015).
14.
ECU (Equality Challenge Unit) (2011) Enabling equality: Furthering disability equality for staff in higher education. Report, ECU, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/13pxQF3(accessed 20 December 2015).
15.
ECU (Equality Challenge Unit) (2014) Understanding adjustments: Supporting staff and students who are experiencing mental health difficulties. Report, ECU, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/1DofCBh(accessed 20 December 2015).
16.
FlickU (2009) An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 4th ed. London: SAGE Publications.
17.
Foster-FishmanPJimenezTValentiMKelleyT (2007) Building the next generation of leaders in the disabilities movement. Disability and Society22(4): 341–356.
18.
GibbsA (2012) Focus groups and group interviews. In: ArthurJWaringMCoeRHedgesLV (eds) Research Methods and Methodologies in Education. London: SAGE Publications, pp. 186–192.
19.
GoddardJ (2003) Leadership in the (post)modern era. In: BennettNAndersonL (eds) British Educational Leadership, Management and Administration Society, Rethinking Educational Leadership: Challenging the Conventions. London: SAGE Publications, pp.11–27.
20.
HartasD (2015) Survey research in education. In: HartasD (ed.) Educational Research and Inquiry: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Continuum, pp. 257–269.
21.
HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England) (2010) The higher education workforce framework 2010: Overview report. Report, HEFCE, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/15wQVFs(accessed 20 December 2015).
22.
HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England) (2012a) HEFCE equality and diversity scheme 2012–2014. Report, HEFCE, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/15Avy6o(accessed 20 December 2015).
23.
HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England) (2012b) Staff employed at HEFCE-funded HEIs: Trends and profiles 1995–96 to 2010–11. Report, HEFCE, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/1IU5ItN(accessed 20 December 2015).
24.
HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England) (2014) Staff employed at HEFCE-funded HEIs: Trends and profiles. Report, HEFCE, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/1HSD2C3(accessed 20 December 2015).
25.
Imperial College London (2013) The calibre leadership programme. Available at: http://bit.ly/1AExlEa(accessed 20 December 2015).
26.
JorgensenCBatesKFrechetteASonnenmeierRCurtinJ (2011) Nothing about us without us: Including people with disabilities as teaching partners in university courses. International Journal of Whole Schooling7(2): 109–126.
27.
Kamm-LarewDStanfordJGreeneRHeacoxCHodgeW (2008) Leadership style in the deaf community: An exploratory case study of a university president. American Annals of the Deaf153(4): 357–367.
28.
KulkarniMLengnick-HallML (2014) Obstacles to success in the workplace for people with disabilities: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Development Review13(2): 158–180.
29.
LeithwoodKJantziDSteinbachR (1999) Changing Leadership for Changing Times. Buckingham: Open University Press.
30.
LumbyJ (2012) What do we know about leadership in higher education?Report, LFHE, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/1OXHqQL(accessed 20 December 2015).
31.
LuriaGKalishYWeinsteinM (2014) Learning disability and leadership: Becoming an effective leader. Journal of Organizational Behaviour35(6): 747–761.
32.
National Council on Disability (2000) Carrying on the good fight: Summary paper from think tank 2000 – advancing the civil and human rights of people with disabilities from diverse cultures. Report, Think Tank 2000, USA. Available at: http://1.usa.gov/1DcSsPU(accessed 20 December 2015).
33.
NeilsonWBrinkA (2008) The importance of educating student teachers in inclusive education: A disability perspective. Kairaranga9(2): 16–21.
34.
NIACE (National Institute of Adult Continuing Education) (2008) From compliance to culture change: Disabled staff working in lifelong learning. Report, Commission for Disabled Staff in Lifelong Learning, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/1IstSbr(accessed 20 December 2015).
35.
PA Consulting Group (2010) The future workforce for higher education. Report, HEFCE, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/1uMCZmU(accessed 20 December 2015).
36.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2009) Review of the Equality Challenge Unit. Report, HEFCE, UK. Available at: http://bit.ly/1B9LUeU(accessed 20 December 2015).
37.
RoulstoneAWilliamsJ (2014) Being disabled, being a manager: ‘Glass partitions’ and conditional identities in the contemporary workplace. Disability and Society29(1): 16–29.
38.
Sanchez-HuclesJDavisD (2010) Women and women of colour in leadership: Complexity, identity and intertextuality. American Psychologist65(3): 171–181.
39.
ShakespeareT (2000) Help: Imagining Welfare. Birmingham: British Association of Social Workers and Venture Press.
40.
SmithRSalendSRyanS (2001) Watch your language: Closing or opening the special education curtain. Teaching Exceptional Children33(4): 18–23.
41.
TeddlieCYuF (2007) Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research1(1): 77–100.
42.
TerrellS (2012) Mixed-methods research methodologies. The Qualitative Report17(1): 254–180. Available at: http://bit.ly/1LMaChc(accessed 25 March 2016).
43.
ThielS (2014) Research Methods in Public Administration and Public Management. Oxford: Routledge.
44.
UoTM (University of The Midlands) (2006) Consultation with disabled staff. Report, University of The Midlands, UK.
45.
UoTM (University of The Midlands) (2008a) Disabled staff report: Summary of discussions from disabled staff follow up meetings. Report, University of The Midlands, UK.
46.
UoTM (University of The Midlands) (2008b) Towards equality for disabled staff: Summary of national and internal recommendations. Report, University of The Midlands, UK.
47.
UoTM (University of The Midlands) (2009). The disability staff network report. Report, University of The Midlands, UK.
48.
UoTM (University of The Midlands) (2014) Policy statement on disability equality. Report, University of The Midlands, UK.
49.
VehmasS (2004) Dimensions of disability. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics13: 34–40.
50.
WellingtonJ (2015) Educational Research: Contemporary Issues and Practical Approaches. Second edition. London: Bloomsbury.
51.
Wilson-KovacsDRyanMHaslamSRabinovichA (2008) Just because you can get a wheelchair in the building doesn’t necessarily mean that you can still participate: Barriers to the career advancement of disabled professionals. Disability and Society23(7): 705–717.
52.
WilsonVPowneyJHallSDavidsonJ (2006) Who gets ahead? The effect of age, disability, ethnicity and gender on teachers’ careers and implications for school leaders. Educational Management Administration and Leadership34(2): 239–255.
