This article analyses the stakeholder model of boards that is widely used in public and third sector institutions in England and Wales. The central tenet of this model is that such institutions should be strategically led by individuals who are representative of and from the groups that have an interest in them. The article focuses in particular on the operation of the stakeholder model of governing bodies of schools in England and Wales where a range of stakeholders including teachers, parents and the community are represented. The issues that arise from this stakeholder model of governing are analysed and the alternatives to it are considered. A significant alternative is the skills-based model, where boards are constituted on the basis of their expertise and not their interest in the institution. This skills-based model is becoming more prominent in the way governing bodies of academy schools in England are constituted and this is certainly the direction of travel outlined in the 2015 regulations. The article reviews the stakeholder model for the governance of schools at a time when there is much interest in the skills-based approach. The wider implications of shifting from a stakeholder to a skills-based model of public board membership are considered.
BalarinMBrammerSJamesCRMcCormackM (2008) The School Governance Study. London: Business in the Community.
3.
BrysonJ (2004) What to do when stakeholders matter – stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review6(1): 21–53.
4.
ConnollyMJamesC (2011) Reflections on developments in school governance: international perspectives on school governing under pressure. Educational Management Administration & Leadership39(4): 501–509.
5.
DfE (2014a) The Constitution of Governing Bodies of Maintained Schools: Statutory Guidance for Governing Bodies of Maintained Schools and Local Authorities in England. London: DfE.
6.
DfE (2014b) Open Academies and Academy Projects in Development. London: DfE.
7.
DfE (2014c) Governors’ Handbook for Governors in Maintained Schools, Academies and Free Schools. London: DfE.
8.
DfE (2015) The Constitution of Governing Bodies of Maintained Schools: Statutory Guidance for Governing Bodies of Maintained Schools and Local Authorities in England. London: DfE.
9.
DonaldsonTPrestonLE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review20(1): 65–91.
10.
EarleyPCreeseM (2001) The uncertain teacher governor: seeking a role?Research Papers in Education16(4): 323–335.
11.
FarrellCMLawJ (1999) The accountability of school governing bodies. Education Management and Administration27(1): 5–15.
12.
FarrellCM (2005) Governance in the public sector – the involvement of the board. Public Administration83(1): 89–110.
13.
FarrellCMJonesJ (2000) Evaluating stakeholder participation in public services – parents and schools. Policy and Politics28(2): 251–262.
14.
FassinY (2009) The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics84: 113–135.
15.
FreemanRE (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
16.
FreemanREReedD (1983) Stockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective on corporate governance. In HuizingaC (ed.) Corporate Governance: A Definitive Exploration of the Issues. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Extension Press.
17.
FooLMAsenovaDBaileySHoodJ (2011) Stakeholder engagement and compliance culture. Public Management Review13(5): 707–729.
18.
GomesRCLiddleJGomesLOM (2010) A five sided model of stakeholder influence. Public Management Review12(5): 701–724.
19.
HaikioL (2012) From innovation to convention: legitimate citizen participation in local governance. Local Government Studies38(4): 415–435.
20.
HarrisAJonesM (2010) ‘Professional learning communities and system improvement’. Improving Schools13(2): 172–181.
21.
JamesCRBrammerSConnollyMFertigMJamesJJonesJ (2010) The ‘Hidden Givers’: A Study of School Governing Bodies in England. Reading: CfBT.
22.
JamesCRBrammerSConnollyMFertigMJamesJJonesJ (2011) School governing bodies in England under pressure: the effects of socio-economic context and school performance. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership39(4): 414–433.
23.
JamesCRGoodallJHowarthEKnightsE (2014) The State of School Governing in England. London: School Governing Alliance.
24.
JamesJJonesJConnollyMBrammerSFertigMJamesJ (2012) The role of the chair of the school governing body in England. School Leadership & Management32(1): 3–19.
25.
LozanoJ (2005) Towards the relational corporation: from managing stakeholder relationships to building stakeholder relationships (waiting for Copernicus). Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society5(2): 60–77.
26.
McNultyTPettigrewA (1999) Strategists on the board. Organization Studies20(1): 47–74.
27.
MunnP (1998) Parental influence on school policy: some evidence from research. Journal of Educational Policy (0268-0939)13(3): 379–394.
28.
MunnP (2000) Social capital, schools and exclusions in social capital: social theory and the third way. In: BaronSSchullerTFieldJ (eds) Social Capital: Critical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 168–181.
NewSJ (1993) The token teacher: representations of professional educators in school governing bodies. International Studies in Sociology of Education3(1): 69–89.
31.
Ofsted (2011) School Governance: Learning from the Best. London: Ofsted.
32.
RansonSFarrellCPeimNSmithP (2005) Does governance matter for school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement16(3): 305–325.
33.
RansonS (2011) School governance and mediation of engagement. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership39(4): 398–413.
34.
SammonsPGuQDayCKoJ (2011) Exploring the impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes: results from a study of academically improved and effective schools in England. International Journal of Educational Management25(1): 83–101.
35.
TaylorMO’SullivanN (2009) How should national governing bodies of sport be governed in the UK? An exploratory study of board structure. Corporate Governance: An International Review17(6): 81–693.
WilkinsA (2010) Citizens and Consumers: Mutations in the construction of concepts and practices of school choice. Journal of Education Policy25(2): 175–189.
