School leadership practices that work in areas of multiple deprivation in South Africa

Abstract

This paper reports on evidence from five school principals regarding leadership practices that work in multiple deprived contexts. The South African educational landscape is complex, often described as a cocktail of first and third world institutions. Looking at the schooling system on a continuum, on the one end there are first class schools which can compare favourably with the best in developed countries. On the other extreme there are dysfunctional schools. However, along the scale there are few schools in multiple deprived areas which display high degrees of resilience and perform at levels comparable to first class schools in terms of Matriculation examination results. This paper draws from a study based on the proposition that leadership was the greatest factor to explain such performance. The study was then informed by a quest for knowledge regarding the nature of such leadership. Such knowledge is needed as the country fights to turn around the many dysfunctional schools there are. While there is a corpus of scholarship that ‘speaks’ to this matter internationally, there remains need for home-grown insights in that regard. Two theoretical lenses (servant leadership and the asset-based approach) were applied. The study employed a qualitative approach involving individual face-to-face semi-structured interviews with five purposively selected school principals each representing their school. Findings suggest that the schools in question adopted inside-out development approaches involving the philosophy that they were masters of their own destiny. Time, commitment, and accountability were some of their greatest assets, things that did not have to come from outside the schools. Internal success paved the way for stronger and more fruitful synergies with the ‘outside world’. We conclude that schools in areas of multiple-deprivation need leadership that moves them away from notions of victimhood and deficit thinking towards asset-based approaches.

Keywords

Leadership assets inside-out accountability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adair

(1989) Great Leaders (1st edn). Guildford: The Talbort Adair Press.

Barber

Whelan

Clark

(2010) Capturing the Leadership Premium: How the World’s Top School Systems are Building Leadership Capacity for the Future. London: McKinsey and Company.

Bowman

(2012) No-nonsense Headmaster. Sunday Tribune 15 August 2015.

Brundrett

Crawford

(2008) Introduction: Educational leadership development in a global environment. In: Brundrett

Crawford

(eds) Developing School Leaders: An International Perspective. Oxford: Routledge, pp.1–6.

Chiome

(2011) Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from Zimbabwe. In: Townsend

MacBeath

(eds) International Handbook of Leadership for Learning. London: Springer, pp.445–468.

Christie

Butler

Potterton

(2007) Report to the Minister of Education Ministerial Committee on Schools that Work. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Education.

Cohen

Manion

Morrison

(2011) Research Methods in Education (7th edn). London: Routledge Falmer.

Denzin

Lincoln

(2011) (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Drysdale

Gurr

(2011) Theory and practice of successful school leadership in Australia. School Leadership and Management 31 (4): 355–368.

10.

Forde

(2010) Minds and hearts: Exploring the teacher’s role as a leader of pupils in a class. PhD Thesis. Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

11.

Gesthuizen

van der Meer

Scheepers

(2009) Ethnic diversity and social capital in Europe: Tests of Putman’s thesis in European Countries. Scandinavian Political Studies 32 (2): 121–142.

12.

Kretzmann

McKnight

(1993) Building Communities from Inside Out: A Path Towards Finding and Mobilizing Community Assets. Chicago, IL: ACTA Publications.

13.

Molefe

(2014) Matric success dissected. New Age 19 February 2014.

14.

Murphy

(2008) University-based leader preparation in the US: A brief history and emerging trends. In: Brundrett

Crawford

(eds) Developing School Leaders: An International Perspective. Oxford: Routledge, pp.173–190.

15.

Myburgh

(2014) Matric 2013. Why the FState and NWest success is illusionary. Available at: http://www.politicsweb.co.za (accessed 12 February 2014).

16.

Naicker

Chikoko

Mthiyane

(2013) Instructional leadership practices in challenging contexts. Education as Change 17 (1): 137–150.

17.

Noble

Barnes

Wright

Roberts

(2010) Small area indices of multiple deprivation in South Africa. Social Indicators Research 95 (2): 281–297.

18.

Russell

(2009) From Needs to Assets: Charting a Sustainable Path towards Development in Sub-Saharan African Countries. In: Global Sustainable Conference (ed) The Asset-based Community Development Institute. Chicago, IL: North Western University, pp.1–21.

19.

Schley

Schratz

(2011) Developing leaders, building networks, changing schools through system leadership. In: Townsend

MacBeath

(eds) International Handbook of Leadership for Learning (Part 1). London: Springer, pp.267–295.

20.

Teese

Polsel

(2003) Undemocratic Schooling: Equity and Quality in Mass Secondary Education in Australia. Melbourne, Victoria: Melbourne University Press.

21.

Walker

Dimmock

(2008) Preparing leaders, preparing learners: The Hong Kong experience. In: Brundrett

Crawford

(eds) Developing school leaders: An international perspective. Oxford: Routledge, pp.112–137.

22.

Wheatly

(1997) The Servant Leader, from Hero to Host. Available at: http://www.margarethwheatley.com/articles/herotohost.html (accessed 10 May 2010).

23.

Woolard

(2002) An overview of poverty and inequality in South Africa. Working Paper prepared for DFID (SA).

24.

Wright

Noble

(2009) The South African Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007 at Municipality Level. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Social Development.