This study presents part of a research project currently underway which aims to characterise the best practices of highly effective schools in the Autonomous Region of the Basque Country (Spain). Multilevel statistical modelling and hierarchical linear models were used to select 32 highly effective schools, with highly effective being taken to mean any school with higher-than-expected student results after adjusting for the effect of contextual factors. Subsequently, qualitative techniques were used to record the perceptions of the management teams, educational advisors and inspectors of the selected schools regarding the practices in place in their organisations. This paper presents the results obtained in relation to leadership. These results indicate that leadership comprises a number of different competences that are manifested to different extents in the different schools, although a set of elements was identified as being common to the majority, namely: positive leadership in the school management, a clearly defined mission shared by all professionals, a positive attitude to training and lifelong learning, the ability to foster the commitment and motivation of the teaching staff in relation to a common school project, support for teaching and learning processes, attention paid to questions of peaceful and harmonious coexistence and well-organised coordination.
CrumKShermanW (2008) Facilitating high achievement: High school principals' reflections on their successful leadership practices. Journal of Educational Administration46(5): 562–580.
11.
Decree 15/2001, de 6 de febrero, por la que se crean los Centros de Apoyo a la Formación e Innovación Educativa (Berritzegunes) con carácter de Servicios de Apoyo a la Educación. (BOPV 34. 16-02-2001).
12.
Decree 22/2009, del 3 de febrero, sobre el procedimiento de selección del Director o Directora y el nombramiento y el cese de los otros órganos unipersonales de gobierno de los centros docentes no universitarios de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco dependientes del Departamento de Educación, Universidades e Investigación. (BOPV 34. 18-02-2009).
13.
Decree 61/2012, de 8 de mayo, de modificación del Decreto sobre el procedimiento de selección del director o directora y el nombramiento y el cese de los otros órganos unipersonales de gobierno de los centros docentes no universitarios de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco dependientes del Departamento de Educación, Universidades e Investigación. (BOPV 105, 30-05-2012).
14.
EFQM (2010) Modelo EFQM de excelencia 2010. Madrid: Club Excelencia en Gestión.
15.
GoikoetxeaJ (2007) Descripción del desarrollo organizacional y curricular de diferentes tipos de centro y etapas educativas. Revista de Psicodidáctica12(2): 195–220.
16.
GriffithJ (2004) Relation of principal transformational leadership to school staff job satisfaction, staff turnover, and school performance. Journal of Educational Administration42(3): 333–356.
17.
HallingerP (2003) Leading Educational Change: reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education33(3): 329–352.
18.
HallingerPHeckRH (1996) Reassesing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of the empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly32(1): 5–44.
19.
HallingerPHuberS (2012) School leadership that makes a difference: international perspectives. School Effectiveness and School Improvement23(4): 359–367.
20.
HeckRHHallingerP (2009) Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal46(3): 659–689.
21.
HuberSGMuijsD (2010) School leadership effectiveness: The growing insight in the importance of school leadership for the quality and development of schools and their pupils. In: HuberSG (ed) School Leadership: International Perspectives. The Netherlands: Springer, pp.79–100.
22.
HuffmanJBPankakeAMunozA (2006) The tri-level model in action: Site, district, and state plans for school accountability in increasing student success. Journal of School Leadership16(5): 569–582.
LeithwoodK (1994) Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly30(4): 498–518.
27.
LeithwoodKMascallBStraussT. (2007) Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools6(1): 37–67.
28.
LeithwoodKHarrisAHopkinsD (2008) Seven strong claims about school leadership. School Leadership & Management28: 27–42.
29.
LeithwoodKAndersonSMascallB. (2010) School leaders’ influences on student learning: The four paths. In: BushTBellLMiddlewoodD (eds) The Principles of Educational Leadership and Management. London: Sage, pp.13–30.
30.
LewinKLippitRWhiteRK (1939) Patterns of aggressive behaviour in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology10: 271–301.
31.
LizasoainLIntxaustiNAzpillagaV. (2012) Detección, caracterización y buenas prácticas de centros escolares de alto valor añadido de la comunidad autónoma vasca. Papers of XV National Congress and V Ibero-American of Pedagogy. Burgos.
32.
LOE Organic Law on Education (2006) Ley Orgánica de Educación (General Law regulating Education) 2/2006, de 3 de mayo.
33.
LOMCE (2013) Ley Orgánica para la Mejora de la Calidad Educativa 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre.
34.
MarchesiAMartínEFundaciónSanta María (2002) Evaluación de la educación secundaria: fotografía de una etapa polémica. Madrid: Fundación Santa María.
35.
Martínez AriasMRGaviriaJLCastroM (2009) Concepto y evolución de los modelos de valor añadido en educación. Revista de Educación348: 15–46.
36.
MarksHPrintyS (2003) Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly39(3): 370–397.
37.
MayrowetzD (2008) Making sense of distributed leadership: exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field. Educational Administration Quarterly44(3): 424–435.
38.
MurilloFJ (2003) Una panorámica de la investigación iberoamericana sobre eficacia escolar. Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación1(1): 1–14.
39.
MurilloFJ (2004) Un marco comprensivo de mejora de la eficacia escolar, Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa9(21): 319–359.
40.
MurilloFJ (2006) Una dirección escolar para el cambio: del liderazgo transformacional al liderazgo distribuido. Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación4(4): 11–24.
41.
MurilloFJHernández-CastillaR (2011) Factores escolares asociados al desarrollo socio-afectivo en Iberoamérica. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa17(2): 1–23.
42.
OECD (2007) School leadership in Spain. OECD Country Background Report. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/spain/38529289.pdf (accessed 20 October 2013).
43.
RobinsonVMJLloydCARoweKJ (2008) The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly44: 635–674.
44.
San SaturninoNGoikoetxeaJ (2013) Transformational leadership, empowerment and learning: A study in advanced vocational qualification courses. Revista de Educación362: 594–622.
45.
SpillaneJ (2006) Distributed Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46.
SpillaneJHealeyK (2010) Conceptualizing school leadership and management from a distributed perspective: An exploration of some study operations and measures. The Elementary School Journal111(2): 253–281.
47.
RayAMccomarckTEvansH (2009) Value added in English schools. Education Finance and Policy4(4): 415–438.
48.
WoodsPAGronnP (2009) Nurturing democracy: The contribution of distributed leadership to a democratic organizational landscape. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership37(4): 430–451.
49.
YlimakiRJacobsonS (2013) School leadership practice and preparation: Comparative perspectives on organizational learning (OL), instructional leadership (IL) and culturally responsive practices (CRP). Journal of Educational Administration51(1): 6–23.
