Australian government concern for improved governance in the higher education sector over recent years has driven the implementation of governance protocols. However, there has been little evidence of any evaluation of the impact of the governance structures on the performance of universities. This paper presents an analysis of the impact of the governance structures on performance in government-funded universities since the Australian National Governance Protocols were introduced in 2004. The methodology involved analysing the relationships between indices of governance structures namely board size, board independence and board committees, and financial, research and teaching performances. Results showed that the board size did not relate to financial, research or teaching performance in any way. In terms of board independence, the more independent the boards, the less impact they had on both research and teaching performances. Financial performances were not impacted. This finding may suggest that boards dominated by internal members rather than independent ones could have a better influence on teaching and research performances. While stronger board committees positively impacted financial and research performances, this was not the case for teaching performance. Board committees showed a negative relationship with teaching performance, suggesting that excessive monitoring may negatively influence teaching quality.
AbbottMDoucouliagosC (2003) The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review22(1): 89–97.
2.
AghionPDewatripontMHoxbyCMasCASapirA (2009) The governance and performance of universities: evidence from Europe and the US. Cambridge, MA: NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research Inc.
3.
BaldridgeJVIngolsC (1983) The Dynamics of Organizational Change in Education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Pub. Corp.
4.
BarrettP. (2004) Corporate governance – a more private public sector. Speech delivered to the MBA governance students at Macquarie University Graduate School of Management, 29 February. Canberra: Australian National Audit Office.
5.
BedggoodREDonovanJD (2012) University performance evaluations: what are we really measuring?Studies in Higher Education37
(7): 825–842.
6.
BennettB (2002) The new style Boards of Governors –are they working?Higher Education Quarterly56
(3): 287–302.
7.
BhagatSBlackB (1998) Board independence and long-term performance. Boulder, CO: Working Paper, University of Colorado.
8.
BhagatSBlackB (2001) Non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law27: 231–274.
9.
BirrellBEdwardsD (2009) The Bradley Review and access to higher education in Australia. Australian Universities’ Review51
(1): 4–13.
10.
BradleyDNoonanPNugentHScalesB (2009) Review of Australian higher education: final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
11.
BrattiMMcKnightANaylorRSmithJ (2004) Higher education outcomes, graduate employment and university performance indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society)167
(3): 475–496.
12.
BucklandR (2004) Universities and industry: does the Lambert code of governance meet the requirements of good governance?Higher Education Quarterly58
(4): 243–257.
13.
ByrdJWHickmanKA (1992) Do outside directors monitor managers?Journal of Financial Economics32
(2): 195–221.
14.
CadburyA (1992) Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance. London: Gee Publishing.
15.
CallenJLKleinATinkelmanD (2003) Board composition, committees, and organizational efficiency: the case of nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly32
(4): 493–520.
16.
CarringtonRCoelliTRaoP (2005) The performance of Australian universities: conceptual issues and preliminary results. Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy24
(2): 145–163.
17.
ChagantiRSMahajanVSharmaS (1985) Corporate board size, composition and corporate failures in the retailing industry. Journal of Management Studies22
(4): 400–417.
18.
CoaldrakePStedmanLLittleP (2003) Issues in Australian university governance. Research Paper. Brisbane:, Queensland University of Technology.
19.
Committee of University Chairmen (2001) Guide for Members of Governing Bodies of Universities and Colleges in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. London: CUC.
20.
DavisJHSchoormanFDDonaldsonL (1997) Towards a stewardship theory of manangement. Academy of Management Review22
(1): 20–47.
21.
DawkinsJ (1988) Higher Education: A Policy Statement (Dawkins White Paper), Canberra: Department of Employment Education and Training.
22.
De Silva LokuwadugeCS (2010) Governance Best Practice of Australian Universities. Finance and Corporate Governance Conference. Melbourne: La Trobe University.
23.
De Silva LokuwadugeCS. (2011a) Analysis of governance and performance of Australian universities. Journal of the World Universities Forum4
(2): 69–84.
24.
De Silva LokuwadugeCS. (2011b) Governance and performance: an empirical study of Australian universities. School of Law, Faculty of Business and Law. Melbourne: Victoria University, pp.1–253.
25.
DearingR (1997) Higher Education in the Learning Society: National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (NCIHE). London: HMSO.
26.
Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) (2008a) Higher Education Report 2006. Canberra: Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations, 1–122.
27.
Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations(DEEWR). (2008b) Higher Education Report 2007. Canberra: Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations, pp.1–112.
28.
Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) (2009) Institutional assessment framework. Information Collection. Canberra: Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations.
29.
Department of Education Science and Training (DEST) (2005) Review of higher education outcome indicators. Canberra: Department of Education Science and Training.
30.
Department of Education Science and Training (DEST). (2007) Higher Education Report 2005. 1/2007 edition. Canberra: Department of Education Science and Training, pp.1–143.
31.
DixonKCoyD (2007) University governance: governing bodies as providers and users of annual reports. Higher Education54
(2): 267–291.
32.
DonaldsonLDavisJH (1991) Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management16
(1): 49–64.
33.
DonaldsonTPrestonLE (1995) The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Imp lications. Academy of Management Review20
(1): 65–91.
34.
DuckettS (2004) Turning right at the crossroads: the Nelson report’s proposals to transform Australia’s universities. Higher Education47
(2): 211–240.
35.
EdwardsM (2000) University governance: a mapping and some issues. LifeLong Learning Network National Conference. Melbourne: Association for Tertiary Education Management.
GreenburyR (1995) Report of the Committee on Executive Remuneration. London: Gee Publishing.
41.
GuthrieJNeumannR (2007) Economic and non-financial performance indicators in universities: the establishment of a performance-driven system for Australian higher education. Public Management Review9
(2): 231–252.
42.
HampelR (1998) The Committee on Corporate Governance: Final Report. London: Gee Publishing.
43.
HarmanKTreadgoldE (2007) Changing patterns of governance for Australian universities. Higher Education Research & Development26
(1): 13–29.
44.
HenkelM (1997) Academic values and the university as corporate enterprise. Higher Education Quarterly51
(2): 134–143.
HoareD (1995) Higher education management review: report of the committee of inquiry. In: Australia Co (ed) Accounting, Accountability and Performance. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
47.
JarrattSA (1985) Report of the steering committee for efficiency studies in universities. London: CVCP/UGC.
48.
JensenMC (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of the internal control systems. Journal of finance48
(3): 831–880.
49.
KahanMRockE (2003) Corporate constitutionalism: antitakeover charter provisions as precommitment. University of Pennsylvania Law Review152
(2): 473–522.
KleinA (1998) Firm performance and board committee structure. Journal of Law and Economics41
(1): 275–303.
52.
KrivogorskyV (2006) Ownership, board structure, and performance in continental Europe. International Journal of Accounting41
(2): 176–197.
53.
LiptonMLorschJW (1992) A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer48
(1): 59–78.
54.
LonginT (2002) Institutional governance: A call for collaborative decision-making in American higher education. In: BerberetWGMcMillinLA (eds.) A new academic compact. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Co., pp. 211–221.
55.
MarginsonSConsidineM (2000) The enterprise university: power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
McKinnonKWalkerSDavisD (2000) Benchmarking: a manual for Australian Universities. Canberra: HED, DETYA.
57.
MehdiIKE (2007) Empirical evidence on corporate governance and corporate performance in Tunisia. Corporate Governance: An International Review15
(6): 1429–1441.
58.
MiddlehurstR (2004) Changing internal governance: a discussion of leadership roles and management structures in UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly58
(4): 258–279.
59.
MorinRJarrellS (2000) Driving shareholder value: value-building techniques for creating shareholder wealth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
60.
NelsonB (2003) Our universities: backing Australia’s future, Canberra: Department of Education Science and Training (DEST).
61.
NelsonB (2009) Higher Education Report for 2003 to 2005 Triennium, Canberra: Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations.
62.
NeumannRGuthrieJ (2006) Performance indicators in Australian universities: establishment, development and issues. European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management (EIASM ) 2nd Workshop on the Process of Reform of University Systems. Giorgio Cini Foundation, Venice, Italy.
63.
PfefferJSalancikG (2003) The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
64.
RashidK (2008) A comparison of corporate governance and firm performance in developing (Malaysia) and developed (Australia) financial markets. PhD Thesis, Victoria University, Melbourne.
65.
RechnerPDaltonDR (1991) CEO uality and organisational performance: longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal12
(2): 155–160.
66.
SalancikGPfefferJ (1974) The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: the case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly19
(4): 453–473.
67.
ShattockM (2006) Managing Good Governance in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
68.
ShattockM (2008) The change from private to public governance of British higher education: its consequences for higher education policy making 1980–2006. Higher Education Quarterly62
(3): 181–203.
69.
ShattockM (2013) University governance, leadership and management in a decade of diversification and uncertainty. Higher Education Quarterly67
(3): 217–233.
70.
ShivdasaniAZennerM (2004) Best practices in corporate governance: what two decades of research reveals. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance16
(2–3): 29–41.
71.
StoreyHArmstrongA (2004) Corporate governance in universities. In: ArmstrongAFrancisRD (eds) Applications of Corporate Governance. Sydney: Standards Australia International.
72.
SwanssonJMowKBartosS (2005) Good university governance in Australia. In: Proceedings of 2005 Forum of the Australasian Association for Institutional Research, AAIR Forum, Melbourne, 6–7 October 2005, pp 98–109. Melbourne: National Institute for Governance.
73.
TrakmanL (2008) Modelling university governance. Higher Education Quarterly62(1–2): 63–83.
ValadkhaniAWorthingtonA (2006) Ranking and clustering Australian university research performance, 1998–2002. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management28
(2): 189–210.
78.
VidovichLCurrieJ (2011) Governance and trust in higher education. Studies in Higher Education36(1): 43–56.
79.
WarningS (2007) The Economic Analysis of Universities: Strategic Groups and Positioning. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
80.
WeirCMLaingDMcKnightPJ (2002) Internal and external governance mechanisms: their impact on the performance of large UK public companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting29
(5–6): 579–611.
81.
WeisbachM (1988) Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics20
(1–2): 431–460.
82.
WestR (1998) Review of higher education financing and policy (The West Review). Canberra: Department of Education Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA): 109.
83.
WorthingtonACLeeBL (2008) Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998–2003. Economics of Education Review27
(3): 285–298.
84.
YermackD (1996) Higher market value of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics40
(2): 185–212.
85.
ZahraSPearceJ (1989) Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: a review and integrative model. Journal of Management15
(2): 291–334.
