This article discusses the work of mid-level management at Finnish universities of applied sciences. Based on in-depth interviews with 15 line managers, this study investigates how the standardized management ideas of rational management and employee empowerment are used in the leadership of lecturers at these institutions. The findings indicate that the work of middle managers is characterized by the consistent pursuit of rationality, strenuous efforts to provide individualized attention to every staff member and the promotion of cooperation. This study concludes that the global management script has firmly shaped the work of middle management at Finnish universities of applied sciences, as demonstrated by their attempts to tighten the couplings between the organizational subsystems and between the management and the teaching staff.
AarrevaaraTDobsonIR (2012) Satisfaction guaranteed! A tale of two systems. In: BentleyPJCoatesHDobsonIR. (eds) Job Satisfaction Around the Academic World. Advice from the CAP Survey. Dordrecht: Springer, 103–123.
2.
AmaralAFultonOLarsenIM (2003) A managerial revolution? In: AmaralAMeekVLLarsenIM (eds) The Higher Education Managerial Revolution?Dordrecht: Kluwer, 275–296.
3.
BastedoMN (2012) Organizing higher education: a manifesto. In: BastedoMN (ed.) The Organization of Higher Education: Managing Colleges for a New Era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 3–41.
4.
BirnbaumR (1988) How Colleges Work. The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BirnbaumR (2004) The end of shared governance: looking ahead or looking back. New Directions for Higher Education2004(127): 5–22.
6.
BleiklieIKoganM (2007) Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy20(4): 477–493.
7.
BoldenRPetrovGGoslingJ (2009) Distributed leadership in higher education - rhetoric and reality. Educational Management Administration & Leadership37(2): 257–277.
8.
BoldenRPetrovGGoslingJ (2008) Tensions in higher education leadership: towards a multi-level model of leadership practice. Higher Education Quarterly62(4): 358–376.
9.
BoldenR (2011) Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews13(3): 251–269.
10.
BolmanLGDealTE (1991) Leadership and management effectiveness: a multi-frame. Multi-Sector Analysis. Human Resource Management30(4): 509–534.
11.
BolmanLGDealTE (2008) Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
BrymanA (2007) Qualitative research on leadership: a critical but appreciative review. Leadership Quarterly15(6): 729–769.
13.
BurkeKM (2010) Distributed leadership and shared governance in post-secondary education. Management in Education24(2): 51–54.
14.
CarvalhoTSantiagoR (2010) New public management and `middle management’: how do deans influence institutional policies? In: MeekVLGoegedebuureLSantiagoR. (eds) The Changing Dynamics of Higher Education Middle Management. Dordrecht: Springer, 165–196.
15.
CleggSMcAuleyJ (2005) Conceptualising middle management in higher education: a multifaceted discourse. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management27(1): 19–34.
16.
CzarniawskaBJoergesB (1996) Travel of ideas. In: CzarniawskaBSevónG (eds) Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: de Gruyter, 13–48.
17.
De BoerHGoegedebuureLMeekVL (2010) The changing nature of academic middle management: a framework for analysis. In: MeekVLGoegedebuureLSantiagoR. (eds) The Changing Dynamics of Higher Education Middle Management. Dordrecht: Springer, 229–241.
18.
De BoerHEndersJLeisyteL (2007) On striking the right notes. Shifts in governance and the organisational transformation of universities. Public Administration2007(85): 27–46.
19.
DeemRHillyardSReedM (2007) Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism: The Changing Management of UK Universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
FerlieEMusselinCAndresaniG (2008) The `steering' of higher education systems: a public management perspective. Higher Education56(3): 325–348.
21.
FletcherJK (2004) The paradox of postheroic leadership: an essay on gender, power, and transformational chance. The Leadership Quarterly15: 647–661.
22.
FloydA (2012) `Turning points'. The personal and professional circumstances that lead academics to become middle managers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership40(2): 272–284.
23.
FloydADimmockC (2011) `Jugglers', `copers' and `strugglers': academics’ perceptions of being a head of department in a post-1992 UK university and how it influences their future careers. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management33(4): 387–399.
24.
GoslingJBoldenRPetrovG (2009) Distributed leadership: what does it accomplish?Leadership5(3): 299–310.
25.
HaakeU (2009) Doing leadership in higher education: the gendering process of leader identity development. Tertiary Education and Management15(4): 291–304.
26.
HargreavesAFinkD (2008) Distributed leadership: democracy or delivery?Journal of Educational Administration46(2): 229–240.
27.
HarrisA (2004) Distributed leadership and school improvement. Leading or misleading?Educational Management Administration & Leadership32(1): 11–24.
28.
HölttäS (1995) Towards the Self-Regulative University. Joensuu: Joensuun yliopisto.
29.
HuismanJCurrieJ (2004) Accountability in higher education: bridge over troubled water?Higher Education48(4): 529–551.
30.
JonesSLefoeGHarveyM. (2012) Distributed leadership. A collaborative framework for academics, executives and professionals in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management34(1): 67–78.
31.
KehmBMLanzendorfU (2007) The impacts of university management on academic work: reform experiences in Austria and Germany. Management Revue18(2): 153–173.
32.
KolsakerA (2008) Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: a study of English universities. Studies in Higher Education33(5): 513–525.
33.
KrückenG (2011) A European perspective on new modes of university governance and actorhood. Research and Occasional Paper Series CSHE 17.11. Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education.
34.
KrückenGMeierF (2006) Turning the university into an organizational actor. In: DroriGSMeyerJWHwangH (eds) Globalization and Organization. World Society and Organizational Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 241–257.
35.
LadyshewskyRKVilkinasT (2012) Leadership behaviour and effectiveness of academic programme directors in Australian universities. Educational Management Administration & Leadership40(1): 109–126.
36.
LampinenO (2003) Suomalaisen Korkeakoulutuksen Uudistaminen: Reformeja ja Innovaatioita [The Transformation of Finnish Higher Education: Reforms and Innovations]. Helsinki: Opetusministeriö.
37.
LieffSAlbertM (2010) The mindsets of medical education leaders: how do they conceive of their work?Academic Medicine85(1): 57–62.
38.
MeekVLGoegedebuureLSantiagoR (2010) Introduction. In: MeekVLGoegedebuureLSantiagoR. (eds) The Changing Dynamics of Higher Education Middle Management. Dordrecht: Springer, 1–13.
39.
MeyerJW (1996) Otherhood: the promulgation and transmission of ideas in modern organizational environment. In: CzarniawskaBSevónG (eds) Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: de Grueter, 241–252.
40.
MeyerJW (2002) Globalization and the expansion and standardization of management. In: Sahlin-AnderssonKEngwallL (eds) The Expansion of Management Knowledge. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 33–44.
41.
MeyerJWDroriGSHwangH (2006) World society and the proliferation on formal organization. In: DroriGSMeyerJWHwangH (eds) Globalization and Organization. World Society and Organizational Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25–49.
42.
MilburnPD (2010) The role of programme managers as academic leaders. Active Learning in Higher Education11(2): 87–95.
43.
Ministry of Education and Culture (2011) Vuosikatsaus 2010. [Annual Review 2010]. Helsinki: Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö.
44.
OrtonJDWeickKE (1990) Loosely coupled systems: a reconceptualization. The Academy of Management Review15(2): 203–223.
45.
PecharH (2010) Academic middle managers under the new governance regime at Austrian universities. In: MeekVLGoegedebuureLSantiagoR. (eds) Dordrecht: Springer, 15–30.
46.
QualterAWillisI (2012) Protecting academic freedom in changing times: the role of heads of departments. Journal of Educational Administration and History44(2): 121–139.
47.
RamsdenP (1998) Learning to Lead in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
48.
Sahlin-AnderssonKEngwallL (2002) The dynamics of management knowledge expansion. In: Sahlin-AnderssonKEngwallL (eds) The Expansion of Management Knowledge. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 277–296.
49.
SalminenA (2003) New public management and Finnish public sector organisations: the case of universities. In: AmaralAMeekVLLarsenIM (eds) The Higher Education Managerial Revolution?Dordrecht: Kluwer, 55–69.
50.
SaloP (2002) Skolan som Mikropolitisk Organisation. En Studie i det som Skolan Är [School as a Micropolitic Organisation. A Study on What School Is]. Åbo: Åbo Akademis Förlag.
51.
SantiagoRCarvalhoT (2012) Managerialism rethorics in Portugese higher education. Minerva50(4): 511–532.
52.
SavonmäkiP (2005) Collaboration among teachers in polytechnics. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work2(2): 152–155.
53.
SavonmäkiP (2007) Opettajien Kollegiaalinen yhteistyö Ammattikorkeakoulussa. Mikropoliittinen Näkökulma Opettajuuteen. [Collegial Collaboration among Teachers in Polytechnic. A Micropolitical Perspective on Teachership]. Jyväskylä: Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos.
54.
ShattockM (2003) Managing Successful Universities. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
55.
SypawkaWMalletWMcFaddenC and (2010) Leadership styles of community college academic deans. Community College Enterprise16(1): 63–73.
56.
VuoriJ (2011) Leadership Frames of Program Directors at Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
57.
VerhoevenJC (2010) Academic middle managers and management in university colleges and universities in Belgium. In: MeekVLGoegedebuureLSantiagoR. (eds). Dordrecht: Springer, 55–81.
WinterR (2009) Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management31(2): 121–131.
60.
ZepkeN (2007) Leadership, power and activity systems in a higher education context: will distributive leadership serve in an accountability driven world?International Journal of Leadership in Education10(3): 301–314.
