Drawing on data from a series of semi-structured interviews this article reports on findings from a research project focusing on the responses of two local authorities and their secondary schools to the Academies Act 2010. The article considers the background and the development of the education system in both localities. It goes on to focus on issues relating to collaboration, competition, independence and the re-structuring of school governance. For the purposes of the analysis, our theoretical underpinnings drew upon path dependence and Michel Foucault’s theories of discourse and power. This framework helped us to illuminate how local conditions had a significant impact on responses to the national policy agenda.
ArthurWB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal97: 642–665.
3.
BallS (2001) Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: toward the performative society. In: GleesonDHusbandsC (eds) The Performing School: Managing, Teaching and Learning in a Performance Culture. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
4.
DavidP (1994) Why are institutions the ‘carriers of history'?: path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics5(2): 205–220.
5.
DavidP (2007) Path dependence: a foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica. Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History1(2): 91–114.
DfEE (2000) A Prospectus for Sponsors and Other Partners. London: DfEE
11.
DiMaggioP (1988) Interest and agency in institutional theory. In: ZuckerL (ed.) Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
12.
DohertyR (2007) Critically framing education policy: foucault, discourse and governmentality. In: PetersMABesleyT (eds) Why Foucault? New Directions in Educational Research. New York: Peter Lang.
13.
FaircloughNWodakR (1997) Critical discourse analysis. In: TVan Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction. London: SAGE.
14.
FoucaultM (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
15.
FoucaultM (1998) The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge. London: Penguin.
16.
GainsPJohnPStokerG (2005) Path dependency and the reform of English local government. Public Administration83(1): 25–45.
17.
GorrardS (2009) What are academies the answer to?Journal of Education Policy24(1): 101–113.
18.
GunterH (ed.) (2011) The State and Education Policy: The Academies Programme. London: Continuum.
19.
HatcherR (2011) Local government against local democracy: a case study of a bid for building schools for the future funding for an academy. In: GunterHM (ed.) The State and Education Policy: The Academies Programme. London: Continuum.
20.
JamesCRBrammerSConnollyM. (2010) The Hidden Givers: A Study of School Governing Bodies in England. Reading: CfBT.
21.
JamesCRJonesJConnollyM. (2012) The role of the chair of the school governing body in England. School Leadership and Management32(1): 3–19.
22.
JohnsonD (1994) Research Methods in Educational Management. Harlow: Longman.
23.
LindsayGMujisDHarrisA. (2007) Schools Federation Pilot Study, 2003–2007. London: DCSF.
24.
MayT (1997) Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process, 2nd edn. Buckingham: Open University Press.
25.
McCroneTSouthcottCGeorgeN (2011) Governance Models in Schools. Slough: NFER.
26.
MiddlewoodDAbbottI (2012) Achieving Success with your Leadership Project. London: SAGE.
27.
NeeVIngramP (1998) Embeddedness and beyond: institutions, change and social structure. In: BrintonMCNeeV (eds) The New Institutionalism in Sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
NCSL (National College for School Leadership) (2011) Leading Governors: The Role of the Chair of Governors in Schools and Academies. Nottingham: NCSL.
29.
Ofsted (2011) The work of school governors. Report from the office of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Schools. London: Ofsted.
PiersonP (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review95(2): 251–267.
32.
PowellW (1991) Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In: PowellWDiMaggioP (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
TitscherSMeyerMWodakR. (2000) Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis: In Search of Meaning. London: SAGE.
35.
TrouveHCouturierYEtheridgeF (2010) The path dependency theory: analytical framework to study institutional integration – the case of France. International Journal of Integrated Care10. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2916113/.
