This article analyses the paradox inherent in the ‘top-performing’ yet tightly controlled Singapore education system. As government controls have increased in complexity, existing policymaking conceptual heuristics in accounting for centre-periphery relationships appear inadequate. It argues that more direct government control is being replaced by ‘steering through paternalism from close proximity’, reflecting a more subtle centre-periphery relationship in an Asian context.
BardhanP (2002) Decentralization of governance and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives16(4): 185–205.
9.
BiggsJWatkinsD (1996) The Chinese learner in retrospect. In: WatkinsDABiggsJ (eds) The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological, and Contextual Influences. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, 269–285.
10.
BondMHHwangK (1986) The social psychology of Chinese people. In: BondMH (ed) The Psychology of the Chinese People. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 213–266.
11.
BoweRBallSJGoldA (1992) Reforming Education and Changing Schools. London: Routledge.
12.
BurchellG (1996) Liberal government and techniques of the self. In: BarryAOsborneTRoseN (eds) Foucault and Political Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 19–36.
ChanDTanJ (2008) Privatization and the rise of direct subsidy scheme schools and independent schools in Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Educational Management22(6): 464–487.
ChenCCFarhJL (2010) Development in understanding Chinese leadership: Paternalism and its elaborations, moderations, and alternatives. In: BondMH (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 599–622.
17.
DaleR (1999) Specifying globalization effects on national policy: a focus on the mechanisms. Journal of Education Policy14(1): 1–17.
18.
DimmockC (2000) Designing the Learning-Centred School: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. London: The Falmer Press.
19.
DimmockC (2011) Diversifying schools and leveraging school improvement: a comparative analysis of the English radical and Singapore conservative, specialist schools' policies. British Journal of Educational Studies59(4): 439–458.
20.
DimmockC (2012) Leadership, Capacity Building and School Improvement: Concepts, Themes and Impact. London: Routledge.
21.
DimmockCGohJWP (2011) Transformative pedagogy, leadership and school organization for the twenty-first-century knowledge-based economy: the case of Singapore. School Leadership & Management31(3): 215–234.
22.
DimmockCWalkerA (2005) Educational leadership: Culture and Diversity. London: SAGE.
23.
DowlingJPfefferJ (1975) Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review18(1): 122–136.
24.
DuttaS (2012) The Global Innovation Index 2012: Stronger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth. Fontainebleau: INSEAD and World Intellectual Property Organization.
25.
FarhJLChengBS (2000) A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In: LiJTTsuiASWeldonE (eds) Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context. London: Macmillan, 94–127.
26.
GohCT (1997) Speech by Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong at the opening of the 7th International Conference on Thinking on Monday, 2 June 1997. Available at: http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/1997/020697.htm(accessed 7 September 2011).
27.
GopinathanS (2005) Remaking the Singapore curriculum: trends, Issues and Prospects. In: First Conference of Asia Pacific Curriculum Policy Makers, Hong Kong, China.
28.
GopinathanS (2007) Globalization, the Singapore developmental state and education policy: a thesis revisited. Globalization, Societies and Education5(1): 53–70.
29.
GopinathanSDengZ (2006) Fostering school-based curriculum development in the context of new educational initiatives in Singapore. Planning & Changing37(1/2): 93–110.
30.
GopinathanSWongBTangN (2008) The evolution of school leadership policy and practice in Singapore: responses to changing socio-economic and political contexts (‘insurgents,’ ‘implementers,’ ‘innovators’). Journal of Educational Administration and History40(3): 235–249.
31.
HanC (2009) Creating good citizens, or a competitive workforce, or just plain political socialization. In: LallMVickersE (eds) Education as a Political Tool in Asia. London: Routledge, 102–119.
32.
HanFKZuraidahIChuaMH. (2011) Lee Kuan Yew: Hard Truths to Keep Singapore Going. Singapore: Straits Times Press.
33.
HargreavesA (2000) Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching6(2): 151–182.
34.
HoKL (2003) Shared Responsibilities, Unshared Power: The Politics of Policymaking in Singapore. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.
35.
KarlsenGE (2000) Decentralized centralism: Framework for a better understanding of governance in the field of education. Journal of Education Policy15(5): 225–258.
36.
KingAYCBondMH (1985) The Confucian paradigm of man: a sociological view. In: TsengWWuDYH (eds) Chinese Culture and Mental Health. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 29–45.
37.
LeeKY (1998) Lee Kuan Yew: The Man and his Ideas. Singapore: Times Editions.
38.
LimLH (2007) Illuminating the core of Singapore school leadership preparation: two decades of in-service experience. International Journal of Educational Management21(5): 433–439.
LingardB (1993) The changing state of policy production in education: some Australian reflections on the state of policy sociology. International Studies in Sociology of Education3(1): 25–47.
41.
LingardB (1996) Review essay: Educational policy making in a postmodern state: on Stephen J. Ball's Education reform: a critical and post-structural approach. Australian Educational Researcher23(1): 65–91.
42.
MarceauJ (1993) Steering from a Distance: International Trends in the Financing and Governance of Higher Education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
43.
McCreedyA (2004) The ‘Creativity Problem’ and the Future of the Japanese Workforce (Asia Program Special Report 121). Washington, DC: Wilson Center.
44.
McKennaSRichardsonJ (2009) Education in a one-party “democracy”. In: HillD (ed.) The Rich World and the Impoverishment of Education. New York: Routledge, 223–237.
45.
MOE (1981) Principals' Handbook. Singapore: MOE.
46.
MOE (2003) Speech by RADM (NS) Teo Chee Hean, Minister for Education and Second Minister for Defence at the Senior Education Officer promotion ceremony 2003 on Saturday, 12 April 2003. Available at: http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2003/sp20030412.htm(accessed 7 November 2011).
47.
MOE (2007) Committee on National Education: Executive Summary. Singapore: MOE.
48.
MOE (2008) Anchored in Values and Purpose: Philosophy for Educational Leadership in Singapore. Singapore: MOE.
NeoBSChenG (2007) Dynamic Governance. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
56.
NgPT (2003) The Singapore school and the school excellence model. Educational Research for Policy and Practice2(1): 27–39.
57.
NgPT (2005) Students' perceptions of change in the Singapore education system. Educational Research for Policy and Practice2(1): 27–39.
58.
NgPT (2007) Quality assurance in the Singapore education system in an era of diversity and innovation. Educational Research for Policy and Practice6(3): 235–247.
59.
NgPT (2008a) Developing forward-looking and innovative school leaders: the Singapore leaders in education programme. Journal of In-service Education34(2): 237–255.
60.
NgPT (2008b) Educational reform in Singapore: from quantity to quality. Educational Research for Policy and Practice7(1): 5–15.
61.
NgPT (2010) The evolution and nature of school accountability in the Singapore education system. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability22(4): 275–292.
62.
NgPTChanD (2008) A comparative study of Singapore's school excellence model with Hong Kong's school-based management. International Journal of Educational Management22(6): 488–505.
63.
OECD (2001a) Report on Hungary. OECD Seminar on Managing Education for Lifelong Learning. Paris: OECD.
64.
OECD (2001b) What School for the Future?Paris: OECD.
PS21 Office (1996) Annual Report of the PS21 Office: 1995/96. Singapore: PS21 Office.
67.
RoseN (1996) Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies. In: BarryAOsborneTRoseN (eds) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. London: UCL Press, 37–64.
68.
SchwabK (2011) The Global Competitiveness Report 2011–2012. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
69.
ShanmugaratnamT (2005) Speech by Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Minister for Education, at the MOE Work Plan Seminar 2005, on Thursday, 22 September 2005. Available at: http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2005/sp20050922.htm(accessed 15 May 2012).
70.
Shared Values (1991) Singapore: Singapore National Printers.
71.
SharpeLGopinathanS (2002) After effectiveness: new directions in the Singapore school system?Journal of Education Policy17(2): 151–166.
72.
TanJ (2007) Pulling together amid globalization: national Education in Singapore schools. In: HershockPDMasonMHawkinsJN (eds) Changing Education: Leadership, Innovation and Development in a Globalizing Asia Pacific. Hong Kong: Springer and Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, 183–197.
73.
The Straits Times (2011) New chapter in the Singapore Story. The Straits Times8 March.
74.
TrockiCA (2006) Singapore: Wealth, Power and the Culture of Control. London: Routledge.