Teacher evaluation conducted by school principals is a common worldwide practice. However, there are many reservations about principals’ ability to evaluate teachers reliably. Reservations appearing in the literature include inflated ratings, minimal discrimination of teacher quality, and evaluations influenced by factors irrelevant to teacher effectiveness. This article examines whether principals can distinguish effective and ineffective teachers and whether principals can identify the teacher, principal and school characteristics influencing principals’ evaluations of teacher effectiveness. The sample consists of 80 school principals; data were collected from principals and teachers, combined with a database of teachers’ academic performance as students in a teacher preparation program. Principals rated teachers on a number of dimensions, and data were analyzed with multiple regression techniques. Results suggest that principal ratings contain enough discriminating ability both within teachers and within dimensions of teacher effectiveness. Factors irrelevant to teacher effectiveness do not influence ratings of teachers. Results also demonstrate greater principal involvement in teacher evaluations, especially in educational systems where their role is limited.
AaronsonDBarrowLSanderW (2007) Teachers and student achievement in Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics25(1): 95−135.
2.
AndrewsTBarnesS (1990) Assessment of teaching. In: HoustonR (ed.) Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. New York: MacMillan, 569−598.
3.
BrandtCMathersCOlivaMB-S M.. (2007) Examining district guidance to schools on teacher evaluation policies in the Midwest Region. Washington, DC: Department of Education, Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest.
BurryJShawD (1988) Teachers and administrators differ in assessing teacher effectiveness. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education12: 33−41.
6.
CangelosiJ (1991) Evaluating Classroom Instruction. New York: Longman.
7.
ClotfelterCLaddHVigdorJ (2006) Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human ResourcesXLI: 778−820.
8.
ClotfelterCLaddHVigdorJ (2007) How and why do teacher credentials matter for student achievement?Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper #12828.
9.
EpsteinJ (1985) A question of merit: Principals and parents' evaluation of teachers. Educational Researcher14: 3−10.
10.
FergusonR (1991) Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal of Legislation28: 465−498.
11.
FergusonRLaddH (1996) How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama Schools. In: LaddH (ed) Holding Schools Accountable. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
12.
FetlerM (1999) High school staff characteristics and mathematics test results. Educational Policy Analysis Archives7: 9.
13.
FraseLStreshlyW (1994) Lack of accuracy, feedback, and commitment in teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education18: 47−57.
14.
GrossmanPLoebSCohenJ. (2010) Measure for measure: Between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
15.
HaefeleD (1992) Evaluating teachers: An alternative model. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education16: 335−345.
16.
HanushekE (1992) The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy100: 84−117.
17.
HanushekEKainJRivkinS (1998) Teachers, schools and academic achievement. NBER, Working Paper #6691.
18.
HanushekEKainJO'BrienD. (2005) The market for teacher quality. NBER Working Paper #11154.
HarrisDC (2006) Lowering the bar or moving the target: A wage decomposition of Michigan's Charter and traditional public school teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly42: 424−460.
21.
HawkPCobleCSwansonM (1985) Certification: Does it matter?Journal of Teacher Education36: 13−15.
22.
HenemanHGWilanowskiAKimballSM. (2006) Standards-based teacher evaluation as a foundation for knowledge and skills-based pay. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
23.
JacobBLefgrenL (2006) When principals rate teachers. Education Next6: 59−69.
24.
JacobBLefgrenL (2008) Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education. Journal of Labor Economics26: 101−136.
25.
JacobBAWalshE (2011) What's in a rating?Economics of Education Review30: 434−448.
26.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1988) The Personnel Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Systems of Evaluating Educators. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
27.
KaneTRockoffJStaigerD (2008) What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review27: 615−631.
28.
KaneTJTaylorESTylerJH. (2010) Identifying effective classroom practices using student achievement data. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
29.
KauchakDPetersonKDriscollA (1985) An interview study of teachers' attitudes toward teacher evaluation practices. Journal of Research and Development in Education19: 32−37.
30.
KyriakidesL (2001) Measurement of teaching in Cyprus: Limitations of current practice. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of the Cyprus Educational Association, Nicosia, Cyprus.
31.
KyriakidesLCampbellRJ (2003) Teacher evaluation in Cyprus: Some methodological and conceptual issues arising from teacher and school effectiveness research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education17: 21−40.
LittleOGoeLBellC (2009) A practical guide to evaluating teacher effectiveness. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
34.
MedleyDCokerH (1987) The accuracy of principals' judgments of teacher performance. Journal of Educational Research80: 242−247.
35.
MonkD (1994) Subject matter preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review13: 125−145.
36.
NatrielloG (1984) Teachers' perceptions of the frequency of evaluation and assessments of their effort and effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal21: 579−595.
37.
NatrielloGDornbuschSM (1984) Teacher Evaluative Standards and Student Effort. New York: Longman.
38.
NyeBKonstantopoulosSHedgesL (2004) How large are teacher effects?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis26: 237−257.
39.
OstranderL (1996) Multiple judges of teacher effectiveness: Comparing teacher self-assessments with the perceptions of principals, students and parents. Paper presented at 1996 AERA convention.
40.
PashiardisPSavvidesVLytraE. (2011) Successful school leadership in rural contexts: The case of Cyprus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership39: 536−553.
41.
RinehartJYoungP (1996) Effects of teacher gender and principal gender on ratings of teacher performance. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education10: 313−323.
42.
RistM (1983) Our nationwide poll: Most teachers endorse the merit pay concept. The American School Board Journal170: 23−27.
43.
RivkinSHanushekEKainJ (2005) Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica79: 418−458.
44.
RockoffJ (2004) The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings2004(May): 247−252.
45.
RowanBCorrentiRMillerR (2002) What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement. Teachers College Record104(8): 1525−1567.
46.
SandersWRiversJ (1996) Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement: Research progress report. Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
