The conceptual categories that underlie the business analysis of intellectual capital are relevant to providing an explanation of school performance. By gathering data on student learning, this research provides empirical evidence for the use of school results as an accurate indicator of the effectiveness of the management of public education. This article concludes that schools are essentially knowledge-based organizations, but that is not enough for them to operate as effective learning organizations.
Academy of Management Journal Editors’ Forum (2005) Making public school work: management reform as the key. Academy of Management Journal48(6): 929–940
2.
AlaviSBMcCormickJ (2004) A cross-cultural analysis of the effectiveness of the learning organization model in school contexts. The International Journal of Educational Management18(7): 408–416
3.
ArgyrisCSchonD (1996) Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice. New York: Addison-Wesley
4.
BondTGFoxCM (2001) Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
5.
BrookoverWBBeadyCFloodPSchweitzerJWisembakerJ (1979) Schools, Social Systems and Student Achievement: Schools Can Make a Difference. New York: Praeger
6.
BrunerJ (1996) The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
7.
BushTGloverD (2003) School Leadership: Concepts and Evidence. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership
8.
ChildressSElmoreRGrossmanA (2006) How to manage urban school districts. Harvard Business Review11: 55–68
9.
CohenMDMarchJG (1974) Leadership and Ambiguity. New York: McGraw-Hill
10.
CreemersB (1996) The school effectiveness knowledge base. In: ReynoldsDBollenRCreemersBPMHopkinsDStollLLagerweijN (eds) Making Good Schools. Linking School Effectiveness and School Improvement. London: Routledge
11.
DavemportTPrusakL (1998) Working Knowledge. How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press
12.
DruckerP (1988) The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review: 1–2: 3–11
13.
EdmondsRR (1979) Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership37(10): 15–24
14.
EdvinssonLMaloneM (1997) Intellectual Capital: Realizing your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower. New York: Harper Collins
15.
FullanMHargreavesA (1996) What’s Worth Fighting for in Your School?. New York: Teachers College Press
16.
GandolfiF (2006) Can a school organization be transformed into a learning organization?Contemporary Management Research2(1): 2–72
17.
GarvinD (1993) Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review6(7): 78–91
18.
GlennLC (2002) The Myth of the Common School. Oakland, CA: ICS Press
19.
HanushekEA (2003) The failure of input-based schooling policies. Economic Journal113(485): 64–98
20.
IsaacsonNBamburgJ (1992) Can schools become learning organizations?Educational Leadership50(3): 42–44
21.
KaplanRSNortonDP (1996) Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review74(1): 75–85
LeithwoodKJantziDSteinbachR (1995) An organizational learning perspective on school responses to central policy initiatives. School Organisation15(3): 229–249
24.
LevB (2001) Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute
MacBeathJMortimoreP (eds) (2001) Improving School Effectiveness. Buckingham: Open University Press
27.
NonakaI (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science5 (1): 14–37
28.
OECD (2008) Measuring Improvements in Learning Outcomes. Best Practices to Assess the Value-Added of Schools. Paris: OECD
29.
OuchiW (2003) Making School Work. New York: Simon & Schuster
30.
OuchiW (2009) The Secret of TSL: The Revolutionary Discovery That Raises School Performance. New York: Simon & Schuster
31.
PalettaAVidoniD (2006) Italian school managers: a complex identity. International Studies in Educational Administration1: 46–70
32.
RaschG (1960) Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: The Danish Institute of Educational Research(expanded edition, 1980). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
33.
ReynoldsDStollL (1996) Merging school effectiveness and school improvement: the knowledge bases. In: ReynoldsDBollenRCreemersBPMHopkinsDStollLLagerweijN (eds) Making Good Schools. London: Routledge
34.
ScheerensJBoskerR (1997) The Foundations of Educational Effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon
35.
ScuratiCPalettaA (2009) School empowerment and autonomy in Italian school system. In: NirA (ed.) Centralization and School Empowerment. From Rhetoric to Practice. New York: Nova
36.
SengePM (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday
37.
SengePMNeldaHCMcCabeTLArtKJDuttonBS (2000) Schools That Learn: A Fifth Discipline Fieldbook for Educators, Parents, and Everyone Who Cares About Education. New York: Doubleday Dell Publishing
38.
SergiovanniTJ (1994) Building Community in Schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
39.
SilinsHZarinsSMulfordB (2002) What characteristics and processes define a school as a learning organization? Is this a useful concept to apply to schools?International Education Journal3(1): 24–32
40.
StollL (1996) Linking school effectiveness and school improvement: issues and possibilities. In: GrayKFitz-GibbonCJessonD (eds) Merging Traditions: the Future of Research on School Effectiveness and School Improvement. London: Cassell, 51–73
41.
SveibyKE (1997) The New Organizational Wealth. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Korhler
42.
TeddlieCReynoldsD (2000) The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research. London: Routledge
