The main purpose of this article is to assess the opinions of district governors, who are the highest ranked civilian authority within a district, on educational problems and solutions at the local level. A qualitative research approach was utilized. The district governors believe that they have a very significant and active role in raising standards of education in Turkey. The findings show that district governors spend a considerable amount of time on education-related issues. The district governors asserted that central government should simply determine the general policies concerning education and provide them with more authority.
Akbaba S. ( 2000) Okul yöneticilerinin bilgisayar kullanma düzeyleri [Levels of school administrators’ computer use]. Journal of Educational Research1: 10-16.
2.
Akçakay M. and Yücel N. ( 2007) Değişim mühendisliği ve Türk kamu yönetiminde uygulanabilirliği [Change engineering and it’s applicability in Turkish public administration]. Court of Auditors Journal66-67: 3-34.
3.
Baştepe İ. ( 2002) Normal ve taşımalı eğitim yapan resmi ilköğretim okul yönetici, öğretmen ve sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin okul (örgütsel) etkililik algıları (Malatya ili örneği) [The effectiveness perceptions of administrators, teachers and 8th class students of transported education and public schools (The case of Malatya)]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Ankara, Turkey .
4.
Blunt P. and Turner M. ( 2007) Decentralization, deconcentration, and poverty reduction in the Asia Pacific. In: Cheema GS and Rondinelli DA (eds) Decentralizing Governance . Washington, DC: Bookings Institution Press, 115-130.
5.
Büyükkaragöz Ş. (1998) Eğitimde öğretmenin rolü ve öğretmen tutumlarının öğrenci davranışları üzerindeki etkisi [Teacher’s role in education and the effect of teacher’s attitudes on student behavior] . Journal of National Education137: 17-19.
6.
CG (Central Government) (2007) Public Services All in One Place. Available at: http://www.direct.gov.uk (accessed 20 March 2007).
7.
Cheema GS and Rondinelli DA ( 2007) From government decentralization to decentralized governance . In: Chema GS and Rondinelli DA (eds) Decentralizing Governance . Washington, DC: Bookings Institution Press, 1-20.
8.
Circular for Salary Reward for the Ministry of National Education Staff (1989) Official Bulletin of the Ministry of National Education no: 2302.
9.
Cottrell LS ( 1933) Roles and marital adjustment. Publications of the American Sociological Society27: 107-15.
10.
Cresswell JW ( 1998) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
Demir E. ( 2001) Sınıf öğretmenlerinin iş doyumumu etkileyen olası faktörler ve bu faktörler kapsamında sınıf öğretmenlerinin iş doyum düzeylerinin ölçülmesi [Probable factors effecting classroom teachers’ job satisfaction and testing their job satisfaction levels through these factors] . Unpublished master’s thesis, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
12.
Dönmez M. and Özyardımcı C. (1999) Mahalli idareler maliyesi [Finance of Local Administrations]. Ankara: B.D. Publications.
13.
Emre, C. ( 2002) Mülki yönetim sisteminin işleyişi ve sorunlari [The operation and problems of public administration system] . In: Emre C (ed.) İyi yönetim arayışında Türkiye’de mülki idarenin geleceği [Future of Public Administration in Turkey in Search of Successful Management]. Ankara: Turkish Administrative Research Foundation Publications, 241-280.
14.
Eryılmaz B. ( 1997) Kamu yönetimi [Public Administration]. İstanbul: Erkam Publication.
15.
Gorton RA, Alston JA and Snowden PE ( 2007) School Leadership & Administration. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Gözübüyük, Ş. (1994) Yönetim Hukuku [Administration Law]. İstanbul: Sevinç Publication.
17.
Greenwood J., Pyper R. and Wilson D. ( 2002). New Public Administration in Britain. London: Routledge.
18.
Inayet A. and Karaman-Kepenekci Y. ( 2008) Principals’ opinions of organisational justice in elementary schools in Turkey. Journal of Educational Administration46(4): 497-513.
19.
Johnson DR ( 2001) So, where are we with class size?School Business Affairs67: 12-18.
20.
Karahanoğulları O. (2004) Karşılaştırmalı kamu yönetimi, modern Türkiye yönetsel yapısında Fransa modelliği [Comparative public management, France modelling in modern Turkey administrative structure]. In: Keskin N (ed.) Kamu yönetimi ülke incelemeleri [Country Analysis in Public Administration]. Ankara: Ankara University Publication, 21-91.
21.
Karasu K. ( 2004) İngiltere [England]. In: Keskin N. (ed.) Kamu yönetimi ülke incelemeleri [Country Analysis in Public Administration]. Ankara: Ankara University Publication, 91-187.
22.
Katz D. and Kahn RL ( 1966) The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
23.
Knezek EJ ( 2001) Supervision as a selected instructional leadership behaviour of elementary principals and student achievement in reading. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Texas.
24.
Liu C. ( 1984) An identification of principals’ instructional leadership behaviours in effective schools. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Cincinnati.
25.
MoNE (2007a) Milli Eğitim İstatistikleri [National Education Statistics]. Ankara : Ministry of National Education Publications.
26.
MoNE (2007b) Eğitime per cent 100 destek kampanyası [The Campaign of per cent 100 support for education]. Available at: from www.meb.gow.tr/ (accessed 1 March 2006).
27.
Nigro FA and Nigro LG ( 1977) Modern Public Administration. New York : Harper and Row.
28.
Öztürk H. ( 2001) Belçika’da ve Türkiye’de zorunlu eğitim [Compulsory Education in Belgium and Turkey]. Ankara: Nobel Publications.
29.
Öztürk S. ( 2002) İlköğretim Okullarının Finansman Kaynakları [The Finance Sources of Elementary Schools]. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Ankara, Turkey.
30.
PARR (Public Administration Research Report) ( 1991) Genel rapor [General report]. Ankara : TODAİE Publications.
31.
Polatoğlu A. ( 2003) Kamu yönetimi [Public Administration]. Ankara: METU Press.
32.
Sammons P., Thomas S., Mortimore P., Walker A., Caims R. and Bauser J. ( 1998) Understanding differences in academic effectiveness: practitioners’ views. School Effectiveness and School Improvement9: 286-309.
33.
Sergiovanni TJ ( 1999) The Principalship: A Reflective Practice Perspective . Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon .
34.
Simon HA, Smithborg DW and Thompson VA ( 1950) Public Administration. New York : Alfred A. Knopf.
35.
SLG (Structure of Local Government) (2006) Structure of Local Government in Great Britain. Available at: http://www.alliance.napawash.org (accessed 13 May 2006).
36.
SPO (State Planning Organization) (2004) İlçelerin sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik sıralaması araştırması [Research of Socio-economical Development Gradation of Counties]. Turkish Republic Planning Organization .
37.
SSI (2004) (State Statistic Institute) Yaşam memnuniyeti araştırması [Research of Life Satisfaction]. Ankara: D.İ.E. Publication.
38.
Tekçe Z. ( 1999) İlköğretim öğretmeni yetiştirme ve istihdamında planlama sorunları [Problems of elementary school teacher education and their planning problems in employment] . Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Ankara , Turkey.
39.
The Civil Servants’ Law (1965) The Official Gazette no: 12056 3.
40.
The Constitution of the Republic of Turkey ( 1982). Official Gazette no: 17863.
41.
Ulusoy A. and Vural T. ( 2002) Birleşik Krallık’ta (İngiltere ve Galler) yerel yönetimlerin görevleri ve mali yapıları [Duties and structures of local administrations in the United Kingdom (England and Wales)]. Provinces and Local Administrations677: 1-13.
42.
Usdan M., McCloud B. and Podmostko M. ( 2000) Leadership for Student Learning: Reinventing the Principalship . Available at: http://www.iel.org (accessed 25 March 2007).
43.
Varlık T. ( 2000) Devlet ve özel ilköğretim okullarında çalışan öğretmenlerin iş doyumu (Ankara ili örneği) [Job satisfaction of public and private school teachers (The case of Ankara)]. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Hacettepe, Ankara.
44.
White LD ( 1949) Introduction to the Study of Public Administration . New York: Macmillan.
45.
Wilson W. ( 1987) The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly2: 197-222.
46.
Woods EG ( 2000) Engendering school leadership through strong instructional leadership. NWREL. Available at: http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/9/9033 (accessed 21 May 2007).
47.
Yıldırım and Şimşek H. ( 2004) Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative Research Techiques in Social Sciences]. Ankara : Seçkin Publication.
48.
Zürcher EJ ( 2000) Modernleşen Türkiye’nin tarihi [History of Modernizing Turkey]. İstanbul: İletişim Publications.
