Although there has been a sizable growth spurt in empirical studies of shared leadership over the past decade, the bulk of this research has been descriptive. Relatively few published studies have investigated the impact of shared leadership on school improvement, and even fewer have studied effects on student learning. This longitudinal study examines the effects of collaborative leadership on school improvement and student reading achievement in 192 elementary schools in one state in the USA over a 4-year period. Using latent change analysis, the research found significant direct effects of collaborative leadership on change in the schools’ academic capacity and indirect effects on rates of growth in student reading achievement. In addition, the study identified three different growth trajectories among schools, each characterized by variations in associated school improvement processes. The study supports a perspective on leadership for learning that aims at building the academic capacity of schools as a means of improving student learning outcomes.
Barth R. ( 1990) Improving Schools from Within. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Barth R. ( 2001) Teacher leader. Phi Delta Kappan82(6): 443-449.
3.
Bass B. and Bass R. ( 2008) The Bass Handbook of Leadership. New York: Free Press.
4.
Bell L., Bolam R. and Cubillo L. ( 2003) A Systematic Review of the Impact of School Headteachers and Principals on Student Outcomes. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
5.
Blalock H. ( 1989) The real and unrealized contributions of quantitative sociology. American Sociological Review54: 447-460.
6.
Bloom HS, Hill CJ, Black AR and Lipsey MW ( 2008) Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness1: 289-328.
7.
Bossert S., Dwyer D., Rowan B. and Lee G. ( 1982) The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly18(3): 34-64.
8.
Bush T. and Glover D. ( 2003) School Leadership: Concepts and Evidence. Commissioned report. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
9.
Cook T. ( 2002) Randomized experiments in education. Why are they so rare?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis24(3): 175-200.
10.
Cook T. and Campbell DT ( 1979) Quasi-experimentation. Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
11.
Crowther F., Ferguson M. and Hann L. ( 2008) Developing Teacher Leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
12.
Davies R. ( 1994) From cross-sectional to longitudinal analysis. In: Davies R and Dale A (eds) Analysing Social and Political Change: A Casebook of Methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE , 20-40.
13.
Donaldson GA ( 2001) Cultivating Leadership in Schools: Connecting People, Purpose, and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
14.
Fullan M. ( 2001) Leading in a Culture of Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15.
Gronn P. ( 2002) Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly13: 423-451.
16.
Grubb WN and Flessa J.(209) ‘A job too big for one’: multiple principals and other non-traditional approaches to school leadership. In: Leithwood K, Mascall B and Strauss T (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London: Routledge, 137-164.
17.
Hall G. and Hord S. ( 2001) Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes . Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon .
18.
Hallinger P. ( 2003) Leading educational change: reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education33(3): 329-351.
19.
Hallinger P., Bickman L. and Davis K. ( 1996) School context, principal leadership and student achievement . Elementary School Journal96(5): 498-518.
20.
Hallinger P. and Heck RH ( 1996a) Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: a review of the empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly32(1): 5-44.
21.
Hallinger P. and Heck RH ( 1996b) The principal’s role in school effectiveness: an assessment of methodological progress, 1980-1995. In: Leithwood K, Chapman J, Corson D, Hallinger P and Hart A (eds) International H0andbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. Dordrecht: Klewer Academic, 723-783.
22.
Hallinger P. and Heck RH ( 1998) Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement9(2): 157-191.
23.
Hallinger P. and Murphy J. ( 1985) Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals . The Elementary School Journal86(2): 217-248.
24.
Hallinger P. and Murphy J. ( 1986) The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education94(3): 328-355.
25.
Harris A. ( 2003) Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: heresy, fantasy or possibility?School Leadership and Management23(3): 313-324.
26.
Heck RH ( 2009) Examining the impact of successive teachers on student learning: testing a multilevel cross-classified model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, April.
27.
Heck RH and Hallinger P. ( 2005) The study of educational leadership and management: where does the field stand today? Educational Management, Administration & Leadership33(2): 229-244.
28.
Heck RH, Larson T. and Marcoulides G. ( 1990) Principal instructional leadership and school achievement: validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly26: 94-125.
29.
Hedges L. ( 2008) What are effect sizes and why do we need them?US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children & Families, Paper No.1. Available at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/other_resrch/effect_sizes/pres_papers/hedges.html (accessed 6 December 2008).
30.
Hill P. and Rowe K. ( 1996) Multilevel modeling in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement7: 1-34.
31.
Jackson D. ( 2000) The school improvement journey: perspectives on leadership . School Leadership & Management20(1): 61-78.
32.
Kelly J. and McGrath J. ( 1988) On Time and Method. Newbury Park, CA : SAGE.
33.
Lambert L. ( 2002) A framework for shared leadership. Educational Leadership59(8): 37-40.
34.
Langlois R. and Robertson PL ( 1993) Business organisation as a coordination problem: toward a dynamic theory of the boundaries of the firm. Business and Economic History22(1): 31-41.
35.
Leithwood K. and Jantzi D. ( 1999) The relative effects of principal and teacher leadership on student engagement in school. Educational Administration Quarterly35(Supplemental): 679-706.
36.
Leithwood K. and Montgomery D. ( 1982) The role of the elementary principal in program improvement . Review of Educational Research52(3): 309-339.
37.
Leithwood K., Anderson S., Mascall B. and Strauss T. (in press) School leaders’ influences on student learning: the four paths. In: Bush T, Bell L and Middlewood D (eds) The Principles of Educational Leadership and Management . London: SAGE.
38.
Leithwood K., Day C., Sammons P., Harris A. and Hopkins D. ( 2006) Seven Strong Claims About Successful School Leadership . Nottingham: National College of School Leadership.
39.
Leithwood K., Louis KS, Anderson S. and Wahlsttom K. ( 2004) Review of research: how leadership influences student learning. Wallace Foundation. Available aT: http://www.wallacefoundation.org/NR/rdonlyres/E3BCCFA5-A88B-45D3-8E27-B973732283C9/0/ReviewofResearchLearningFromLeadership.pdf (accessed 19 December 2007).
40.
Leithwood K., Mascall B and Strauss T (2009) What we have learned where we go from here . In: Leithwood K, Mascall B and Strauss T (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. New York : Routledge, 269-282.
41.
Luyten H., Visscher A. and Witziers B. ( 2005) School effectiveness research: from a review of the criticism to recommendations for further development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement16(3): 249-279.
42.
MacBeath J., Frost D. and Swaffield S. ( 2008) Editorial. School Leadership & Management28(4): 301-306.
43.
Marcoulides G. and Hershberger S. ( 1997) Multivariate Statistical Methods: A First Course. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
Marks H. and Printy S. ( 2003) Principal leadership and school performance: an integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly39(3): 370-397.
45.
Marsh HW and Cravens RG ( 2006) Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science1(2): 133-163.
46.
Mulford W. ( 2007) Building social capital in professional learning communities: importance, challenges and a way forward. In: Stoll L and Seashore Louis K (eds) Professional Learning Communities: Divergence, Depth and Dilemmas. London: Open University Press and McGraw Hill, 166-180.
47.
Mulford B. and Silins H. ( 2003) Leadership for organizational learning and improved student outcomes-what do we know? Cambridge Journal of Education33(2): 175-195.
48.
Ogawa, R. and Bossert S. ( 1995) Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly31(2): 224-243.
49.
Peugh JL and Enders C.K. ( 2004) Using an EM covariance matrix to estimate structural equation models with missing data: choosing an adjusted sample size to improve the accuracy of inferences. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal11: 1-19.
50.
Pitner N. ( 1988) The study of administrator effects and effectiveness. In: Boyan N (ed.) Handbook of Research in Educational Administration. New York: Longman, 99-122.
51.
Podsakoff P. ( 1994) Quantitative methods in leadership research. Leadership Quarterly5: 1-2.
52.
Pounder DG, Ogawa RT and Adams EA ( 1995) Leadership as an organization-wide phenomena: its impact on school performance. Educational Administration Quarterly31(4): 564-588.
53.
Raykov T. and Marcoulides G.A. ( 2006) A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
Robinson V., Lloyd C. and Rowe K. ( 2008) The impact of leadership on student outcomes: an analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly44(5): 564-588.
55.
Southworth G. ( 2002) Instructional leadership in schools: reflections and empirical evidence. School Leadership and Management22(1): 73-91.
56.
Southworth G. ( 2003) Primary School Leadership in Context: Leading Small Medium and Large Sized Schools. London: Taylor and Francis.
57.
Timperly H.(2009) Distributing leadership to improve outcomes for students. In: Leithwood K, Mascall B and Strauss T (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London: Routledge , 197-222.
58.
Wiley S. ( 2001) Contextual effects on student achievement: school leadership and professional community. Journal of Educational Change2(1): 1-33.
59.
Williams L. and Podsakoff P. ( 1989) Longitudinal field methods for studying reciprocal relationships in organizational behavior research: toward improved causal analysis. Research in Organizational Behavior11: 247-292.
60.
Witziers B., Bosker R. and Kruger M. ( 2003) Educational leadership and student achievement: the elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly39: 398-425.
61.
Yukl G. ( 2006) Leadership in Organizations. Paramus : Prentice Hall.
