Three decades ago, Willower (1975) argued that much of what we take to be theory in educational administration is in fact only theoretically oriented. If we accept Willower’s assessment of the field as true, what implications does this statement hold for the academic study and practical application of the theoretically oriented aspects of our field being espoused as theory? In this article, the authors examine this question, and suggest that the theoretically oriented of Willower’s assessment has been called models in other fields of study. Further, models are examined and characterized as conceptually distinct from theory and the application of models as a ‘way of doing’ educational administration is discussed.
Ben-Peretz M. ( 1995) Curriculum of teacher education programs. In: Anderson LW (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education. Oxford : Pergamon, 543-547.
2.
Bhaskar R. ( 1978) A Realist Theory of Science. Hassocks : Harvester.
3.
Burgess D. ( 2008) Prolegomenon to interorganisational relationships involving the administration of education.Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon , SK.
4.
Bush T. ( 2003) Theories of Educational Leadership and Management . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
Bush T. ( 2007) Theory and research in educational leadership and management . Educational Management Administration & Leadership35(1) 5-8.
6.
Carr W. ( 1986) Theories of theory and practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education20(2): 177-186.
7.
Clarke KA and Primo DM ( 2007) Modernizing political science: a model-based approach . Perspectives on Politics5(4): 741-753.
8.
Clarke KA and Primo DM ( 2005) Modernizing political science: a model-based approach. Annual Meeting of theMidwest Political Science Association , Chicago, IL.
9.
Culbertson J. ( 1983) Theory in educational administration: echoes from critical theory. Educational Researcher12(10): 15-22.
10.
Da Costa N. and French S. ( 2000) Models, theories and structures: thirty years on . Philosophy of Science67(3): 116-127.
11.
Danermark B., Ekström M., Jakobsen L. and Karlsson J. ( 2002) Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences . London: Routledge.
12.
Darmstadter H. ( 1975) Better theories. Philosophy of Science42(1): 20-27.
13.
Duignan PA and Macpherson RJS ( 1992) Creating new knowledge about educative leadership . In: Duignan PA and Macpherson RJS (eds) Educative Leadership: A Practical Theory for New Administrators and Leaders. London: Routledge, 1-17.
14.
English FW ( 2002) The point of scientificity, the fall of the epistemological dominos, and the end of the field of educational administration. Studies in Philosophy and Education21(2): 109-136.
15.
English FW ( 2008) The Art of Educational Leadership: Balancing Performance and Accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
Giere R. ( 2004) How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science71(5) 742-752.
17.
Hills J. and Gibson C. ( 1992) A conceptual framework for thinking about conceptual frameworks: bridging the theory-practice gap. Journal of Educational Administration30(4): 4-25.
18.
Imber M. ( 1995) Organizational counterproductivism in educational administration . In: Donmoyer R, Imber M and Scheurich JJ (eds.) The Knowledge Base in Educational Administration: Multiple Perspectives. Albany, NY: SUNY, 113-123.
19.
Kohler TA and van der Leeuw SE ( 2007) Model-based Archaeology of Socionatural Systems . Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press.
20.
Korthagan FAJ and Kessels Jpam ( 1999) Linking theory and practice: changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher28(4): 4-17.
21.
Levins R. ( 1966) The strategy of model building in population biology . American Scientist54(4): 421-431.
22.
Lutz F. ( 1975) The role of explanatory models in theory building: in response to LeDoux-Burlingame. Educational Administration Quarterly11(1): 72-78.
23.
Manicas PT ( 2006) A Realist Philosophy of Social Science: Explanation and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
McGrath JE ( 1981) Dilemmatics: the study of research choices and dilemmas . American Behavioral Scientist25(2): 179-210.
25.
Murphy J., Vriesenga M. and Storey V. ( 2007) Educational Administration Quarterly, 1979-2003: an analysis of types of work, methods of investigation, and influences. Educational Administration Quarterly43: 612-628.
26.
Osterman KF ( 1998) Using constructivism and reflective practice to bridge the theory/practice gap. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, San Diego, CA.
27.
Salmon W. ( 1978) Why ask ‘why?’. In: W Salmon (ed.) Causality and Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press, 125-141.
28.
Salmon W. ( 1984) Scientific explanation: three basic conceptions . In: W Salmon (ed.) Causality and Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press, 320-329.
29.
Suppes P. ( 1967) What is a scientific theory? In: S Morgenbesser (ed.) Philosophy of Science Today. New York: Basic Books, 55-67.
30.
Swanwick K. ( 1996) Theory, data and educational relevance. Research Studies in Music Education6: 18-26.
31.
Willower D. ( 1975) Theory in educational administration. University Council for Educational Administration Review16(5): 2-10.
