This article examines the decisions made by one principal in her first year as a school turnaround specialist in a low-performing urban elementary school. Researchers focused on decisions related to the principal’s three high-priority concerns: (1) elimination of an ineffective instructional program; (2) creation of a culture of teacher accountability; and (3) development of an effective reading program. Forty-nine decisions were identified and organized into five categories—performance, policy, program, process, and personnel decisions. The study concludes with a discussion of what principals need to know in order to make the kinds of decisions required of a ‘turnaround’ principal.
Duke, D.L., Tucker, P.D., Belcher, M., Crews, D., Harrison-Coleman, J., Higgins, J., et al. (2005) Lift-off: Launching the School Turnaround Process in 10 Virginia Schools. Charlottesville, VA: Darden/Curry Partnership for Leaders in Education, University of Virginia.
5.
Duke, D.L., Tucker, P.D., Salmonowicz, M.J. and Levy, M.K. ( 2007) ‘How Comparable Are the Perceived Challenges Facing Principals of Low-Performing Schools?’ International Studies in Educational Administration35(1): 3-21.
6.
Hallinger, P. and McCary, C.E. ( 1990) ‘Developing the Strategic Thinking of Instructional Leaders’, The Elementary School Journal91(2): 89-108.
7.
Hoy, W.K. and Tarter, C.J. ( 1995) Administrators Solving the Problems of Practice: Decision-Making Concepts, Cases, and Consequences. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
8.
Leithwood, K. and Steinbach, R. ( 1995) Expert Problem Solving. Albany, NY : State University of New York Press.
9.
March, J.G. ( 1994) A Primer on Decision-making. New York : The Free Press.
10.
Northouse, P.G. ( 2004) Leadership: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
Osterman, K.F. ( 1993) ‘Problems of Practice: From the Principal’s Perspective’, Journal of School Leadership3(2): 59-73.
12.
Patton, M.Q. ( 2001) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
Simon, H.A. ( 1957) Models of Man. New York: Wiley.
14.
Smith, L.M., Dwyer, D.C., Prunty, J.P. and Kleine, P.F. ( 1988) Innovation and Change in Schooling: History, Politics, and Agency. Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.
15.
Spillane, J.P., Diamond, J.B., Burch, P., Hallett, T., Jita, L. and Zoltners, J. ( 2002) ‘Managing in the Middle: School Leaders and the Enactment of Accountability Policy’, Educational Policy16(5): 731-62.
16.
Spillane, J.P., Halverson, R. and Diamond, J.B. ( 2001) ‘Investigating School Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective’, Educational Researcher30(4): 23-8.
17.
Stone, D. ( 1989) ‘Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas’ , Political Science Quarterly104(2): 281-300.
18.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. ( 1998) Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
Wolcott, H. ( 1973) The Man in the Principal’s Office. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
20.
Yin, R.K. ( 1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
