Empowerment or Prescription? Workforce Remodelling at the National and School Level

Abstract

Workforce Remodelling in England implemented between 2003 and 2005 has been presented by the `New Labour' government as a means of enhancing the development of teachers and promoting rising educational attainments. While the processes that schools were to follow to achieve the desired `fundamental alteration in mindset' were prescribed, the outcomes of this process were less so. Conceptually therefore this initiative could potentially be viewed as having more in common with policies seeking to empower schools, rather than the performance management ethos of the dominant market-based approach to reforming English state schooling. This tension created within national policy is reflected in the research reported below which demonstrates that while in some schools Workforce Remodelling has largely taken the form of a centralized reallocation of tasks along lines favoured by the government, in others a more delegated style of leadership has encouraged and enabled redefinitions of roles and opened up fundamental debates about current practice. We find that both intended and unintended outcomes were shaped by the processes adopted in schools to respond to the remodelling agenda.

Keywords

change management empowerment school leadership workforce remodelling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adnett, N. and Davies, P. (2002) `Markets for Schooling: An Economic Analysis', Research in Education, vol. 5. London: Routledge.

Butt, G. and Gunter, H. (2005) `Challenging Modernization: Remodelling the Education Workforce', Education Review 57(2): 131-7.

Butt, G. and Lance, A. (2005) `Modernizing the Roles of Support Staff in Primary Schools: Changing Focus, Changing Function', Education Review 57(2): 39-49.

Buzan, T. (1989) Use Your Memory. London: BBC Books.

Chevalier, A. and Dalton, P. (2005) `The Labour Market for Teachers', in Machin, S. and Vignoles, A. (eds), The Economics of Education in the UK. Woodstock: Princeton University Press.

Chevalier, A. , Dalton, P. and McIntosh, S. (2002) `The Job Satisfaction of UK Teachers', Centre for the Economics of Education. London: School of Economics, mimeo.

Collarbone, P. (2004) `Governors News April 2004 National Association of School Governors Journal Birmingham'. Available at: http://www.nagm.org.uk/govern-apr04.html.

Denis, J.L. , Lamothe, L. and Langley, A. (2001) `The Dynamics of Collective Leadership and Strategic Change in Pluralistic Organisations', Academy of Management Journal 44(4): 809-37.

DfES (2000) The Ninth Report of the School Teachers' Review Body. London: DfES.

10.

DfES (2002) Time for Standards: Reforming the School Workforce. London: DfES.

11.

Dfes (2003) Time for Standards-Raising Standards and Tackling Workload: A National Agreement. London: DfES.

12.

Dunphy, D. and Stace, D. (1990) Under New Management: Australian Organisations in Transition. Sydney: McGraw-Hill .

13.

Eccles, T. (1994) Succeeding with Change: Implementing Action-Driven Strategies. London: McGraw-Hill .

14.

Fielding, M. (1996) `Empowerment: Emancipation or Enervation?', Journal of Education Policy 11(3): 399-417.

15.

Gunter, H. (2001) Leaders and Leadership in Education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

16.

Gunter. H. (2004) `Remodelling the School Workforce'. Paper presented at the School Leadership and Social Justice Seminar Society for Educational Studies, 4 November.

17.

Hussey, D. (1998) Managing Change. London: Kogan Page.

18.

Kotter, J.R. (1995) `Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail' , Harvard Business: Review 73(2): 59-67.

19.

Langley, A. (1999) `Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data', Academy of Management Review 24(4): 691-710.

20.

Mayrowetz, D. and Smylie, M. (2004) `Work Redesign that Works for Teachers', Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education 103(1): 274-93.

21.

Ofsted (2005) Remodelling the School Workforce, HMI 2596. London: Ofsted.

22.

Ozga, J. (2005) `Modernizing the Education Workforce: A Perspective from Scotland', Education Review 57(2): 207-19.

23.

Pascale, R.T. , Millemann, M. and Gioja, L. (1997) `Changing the Way We Change', Harvard Business Review 11(12): 127-39.

24.

Pentland, B.T. (1999) `Building Process Theory with Narrative: from Description to Explanation', Academy of Management Review 24(4): 711-24.

25.

PricewaterhouseCoopers (2001) Teacher Workload Study. London: DfES.

26.

School Teacher Review Body (2004) `School Teachers' Pay and Conditions Document'. Available at: http://www.teachernet.gov.uk. Accessed December 2005 .

27.

Smylie, M. , Miretzky, D. and Konkol, P. (2004) `Rethinking Teacher Workforce Development: A Strategic Human Resource Management Perspective', Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education 103(1): 34-68.

28.

Thomas, H. , Butt, G. , Fielding, A. , Foster, J. , Gunter, H. , Lance, A. , Rayner, S. , Rutherford, D. , Potts, L. , Powers, S. , Selwood, I. and Szwed, C. (2004a) `Transforming the School Workforce Pathfinder Evaluation Project'. DfES Brief No: RBX03-04. Available at: http://www.dfespublications.gov.uk. Accessed February 2005.

29.

Thomas, H. , Butt, G. , Fielding, A. , Foster, J. , Gunter, H. , Lance, A. , Rayner, S. , Rutherford, D. , Potts, L. , Powers, S. , Selwood, I. and Szwed, C. (2004b) `The Evaluation of the Transforming the School Workforce Pathfinder Project', Research Report 541. London : HMSO.