The aim of this article is to contribute to an improved comprehension of the relations between administrators and teachers. The main argument is that mutual dependency is an operational feature of a school organization. I analyse a school case that shows essential features of the interconnections between the parties. An extensive commitment to ICT combined with a commitment to free work forms created a vulnerable situation. The teachers' loss of control influenced the relationship between teachers and the administrators that after a while developed into tug-of-war bargaining. I employ a model of rational interaction in order to enlarge the repertoire of explanation that is an analytical tool that is little used in the literature about educational management. I conclude that the theory can indeed be a tool of analysis for understanding mutual dependencies, but that the rational reconstruction must include the importance that trust can have for management and leadership. Successful exertion of power requires relational trust.
Akershus fylkeskommune (2003) `Kvalitetsundersøkelsen 2003.' Available at: http://www.akershus-f.kommune.no/index .
2.
Anderson, G.L. (1991) `Cognitive Politics of Principals and Teachers. Ideological Control in an Elementary School', in J. Blase (ed.) The Politics of Life in Schools: Power, Conflict, and Cooperation, pp. 129-38. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
3.
Anderson, G.L. (1996) `The Cultural Politics of Schools: Implications for Leadership', in K. Leithwood (ed.) International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration , pp. 947-66. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
4.
Blase, J. (1991) The Politics of Life in Schools. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
5.
Blase, J. and Anderson, G.L. (1995) The Micropolitics of Educational Leadership: From Control to Empowerment. New York: Cassell.
6.
Blau, P. (1986) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
7.
Boudon, R. (1986) Theories of Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8.
Bryk, A.S. and Schneider, B. (2002) Trust in Schools. A Core Resource for Improvement . New York: Russell Sage Foundation .
9.
Bush, T. (2003) Theories of Educational Leadership and Management , 3rd edn. London: SAGE.
10.
Coleman, J.S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Cuban, L. (1984) How Teachers Taught: Constancy and Change in American Classrooms, 1890-1980. New York: Longman.
12.
Cuban, L. (1990) `Reforming Again, Again, and Again,'Educational Researcher19(1): 3-13.
13.
Denscombe, M. (1986) Classroom Control: A Sociological Perspective. London: Allen and Unwin.
14.
Dickens, C. (2003) Hard Times [1st edn. 1854]. Available at: http://www.dickens-literature.com/Hard_Times/
15.
Elmore, R.F. (2004) School Reform form the Inside Out: Policy, Practice, and Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
16.
Elstad, E. (2002) `Towards a Model of Strategic Actions in the Classroom: Games Theory as Research Heuristic', Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research46(1): 65-81.
17.
Elstad, E. (2005) `Process Steering and Result Orientation in Education Politics', Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift89(2): 132-45.
18.
Elstad, E. (2006a) `Understanding the Nature of Accountability Failures in the Technology-filled Laissez-faire Classroom: Disaffected Students and Teachers who give in', Journal of Curriculum Studies38(4): 86-110.
19.
Elstad, E. (2006b) `The Relevance of Rhetoric to the Study of Power in Communication and Communicative Adequacy', International Electronic Journal For Leadership in Learning10(10): 1-14. Available at: http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll/
20.
Erstad, O., Frolich, V., Klovstad, V. and Vestby, G.M. (2000) Den Langsomme Eksplosjonen. ITU-report no 11, Oslo: ITU.
21.
Evans, R. (2001) The Human Side of School Change: Reform: Resistance, and Real-Life Problems of Innovation. New York: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Fullan, M. (2003) Change Forces with a Vengeance. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
23.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1977) Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Haug, P. (2003) Evaluering av Reform 97. Sluttrapport frå styret for Program for evaluering av Reform 97. Oslo: Norges Forskningsråd.
25.
Hirschmann, A.O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hume, D. (2003) A Treatise of Human Nature. [1st edn. 1739]. The University of Adelaide Library Electronic Texts Collection. Available at: http://www.etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/
28.
Ingersoll, R.M. (2003) Who Controls Teachers' Work? Power and Accountability in America's Schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Klette, K. (2003) Klasserommets Praksisformer Etter Reform 97. Oslo: Unipub.
30.
Merton, R. (1957) Social Theory and Social Structures. Glencoe: Free Press.
31.
Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1983) `Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony', in J.W. Meyer and R. Scott (eds) Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. London: SAGE.
32.
Meyer, J. and Scott, W.R. (1983) Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality . Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
33.
Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1992) The Structure of Educational Organizations, Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Newbury Park, CA : SAGE.
34.
Ministry of Education (2003) Culture for Learning: Report to the Storting no. 30Oslo : Ministry of Education.
35.
Popper, K.R. (1975) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. [1st edn 1934.] London: Hutchinson.
36.
Popper, K.R. (1976) `The Logic of the Social Sciences', in T.W. Adorno, H. Albert , R. Dahlendorf, J. Habermas, H. Pilot and K.R. Popper (eds) The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. London: Heinemann .
37.
Rapoport, A. (1959) `Uses and Limitations of Mathematical Models in Social Sciences', in A. Diekman and P. Mitter (eds) Stochastic Modeling of Social Processes, pp. 7-38. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
38.
Rowan, B. (1990) `Commitment and Control: Alternative Strategies for the Organizational Design of Schools', in C. Cazden (ed.) Review of Research in Education16: 353-389. Washington, DC: AERA.
39.
Schelling, T.C. (1960) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Sorhaug, T. (2004) Managementalitet og autoritetens forvandling. Ledelse i en kunnskapsokonomi. Bergen. Fagbokforlaget.
41.
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (2005 ): Robert Aumann's and Thomas Schelling's Contributions to Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict and Cooperation. Available at: http://www.nobel.se
42.
Weber, M. (1947) The Theory of Economic and Social Organization . New York: Oxford University Press .
