Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard design to determine the effectiveness of an intervention, as the only method of decreasing section bias and minimising random error. However, participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials is a major challenge, with many trials failing to recruit the targeted sample size accordingly to the planned protocol. Thus, the aim of this review is to detail the recruitment challenges of preoperative exercise clinical trials.
Methods
A comprehensive search was performed on MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, AMED and PsycINFO from inception to July 2021. Randomised controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of preoperative exercise on postoperative complication and/or length of hospital stay in adult cancer patients were included. Main outcomes included recruitment rate, retention rate, number of days needed to screen and recruit one patient and trial recruitment duration. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise outcomes of interest.
Results
A total of 27 trials were identified, including 3656 patients screened (N = 21) and 1414 randomised (median recruitment rate (interquartile range) = 53.6% (25.2%–67.6%), N = 21). The sample size of the included trials ranged from 19 to 270 (median = 48.0; interquartile range = 40.0–85.0) and the duration of trial recruitment ranged from 3 to 50 months (median = 19.0 months; interquartile range = 10.5–34.0). Overall, a median of 3.6 days was needed to screen one patient, whereas 13.7 days were needed to randomise one participant. Over the trials duration, the median dropout rate was 7.9%. Variations in recruitment outcomes were observed across trials of different cancer types but were not statistically significant.
Conclusion
The recruitment of participants to preoperative exercise randomised controlled trials is challenging, but patient retention appears to be less of a problem. Future trials investigating the effectiveness of a preoperative exercise programme following cancer surgery should consider the time taken to recruit patients. Strategies associated with improved recruitment should be investigated in future studies.
SteffensDSolomonMDenehyL. Is preoperative exercise training the new holy grail for patients undergoing major surgery. Ann Am Thorac Soc2021; 18(4): 587–589.
2.
SteffensDDenehyL. Prehabilitation exercise programs for patients undergoing cancer surgery, does one size fit all?Eur J Surg Oncol2023; 49(2): 303–305.
3.
WaterlandJLMcCourtOEdbrookeL, et al. Efficacy of prehabilitation including exercise on postoperative outcomes following abdominal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg2021; 8: 628848.
4.
SteffensDYoungJRiedelB, et al. PRehabIlitatiOn with pReoperatIve exercise and educaTion for patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgerY: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled TRIAL (PRIORITY TRIAL). BMC Cancer2022; 22: 443.
5.
SheillGGuinanEO’NeillL, et al. Preoperative exercise to improve fitness in patients undergoing complex surgery for cancer of the lung or oesophagus (PRE-HIIT): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer2020; 20: 321.
6.
LambertGDrummondKTahasildarB, et al. Virtual prehabilitation in patients with cancer undergoing surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: protocol for a prospective feasibility study. JMIR Res Protoc2022; 11: e29936.
7.
DesaiM. Recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies: critical issues and challenges. Perspect Clin Res2020; 11(2): 51–53.
8.
BenzoRWigleDNovotnyP, et al. Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation before lung cancer resection: results from two randomized studies. Lung Cancer2011; 74(3): 441–445.
9.
BenzoRWetzsteinMNovotnyP, et al. Randomized study of pulmonary rehabilitation before lung cancer resection in severe COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2011; 183: A3973.
10.
MoherD. CONSORT: an evolving tool to help improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. JAMA1998; 279: 1489–1491.
11.
ShamseerLHopewellSAltmanDG, et al. Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal ‘Instructions to Authors’ in 2014. Trials2016; 17: 301.
12.
Harris-BrownTMPatersonDL. Reporting of pre-enrolment screening with randomized clinical trials: a small item that could impact a big difference. Perspect Clin Res2015; 6(3): 139–143.
DronkersJJLambertsHReutelingspergerIM, et al. Preoperative therapeutic programme for elderly patients scheduled for elective abdominal oncological surgery: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil2010; 24(7): 614–622.
15.
KarlssonEFarahnakPFranzénE, et al. Feasibility of preoperative supervised home-based exercise in older adults undergoing colorectal cancer surgery – a randomized controlled design. PLoS One2019; 14(7): e0219158.
16.
López-Rodríguez-AriasFSánchez-GuillénLAranaz-OstárizV, et al. Effect of home-based prehabilitation in an enhanced recovery after surgery program for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Support Care Cancer2021; 29(12): 7785–7791.
17.
MinnellaEMFerreiraVAwasthiR, et al. Effect of two different pre-operative exercise training regimens before colorectal surgery on functional capacity: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol2020; 37(11): 969–978.
18.
MougSJMutrieNBarrySJE, et al. Prehabilitation is feasible in patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and may minimize physical deterioration: results from the REx trial. Colorectal Dis2019; 21(5): 548–562.
19.
SteffensDYoungJBeckenkampPR, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of a preoperative exercise program for patients undergoing major cancer surgery: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud2021; 7: 27.
20.
FangY-NZhaoQHuangD, et al. Effects of exercise training on surgery tolerability in lung cancer patients with impaired pulmonary function. Life Sci J2013; 10: 1943–1948.
21.
GarcíaRSYáñez-BrageMIMoolhuyzenEG, et al. Preoperative exercise training prevents functional decline after lung resection surgery: a randomized, single-blind controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2017; 31(8): 1057–1067.
22.
HuangJLaiYGaoK, et al. Surfactant Protein-D: a sensitive predictor for efficiency of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation. Int J Surg2017; 41: 136–142.
23.
HuangJLaiYZhouX, et al. Short-term high-intensity rehabilitation in radically treated lung cancer: a three-armed randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Dis2017; 9(7): 1919–1929.
24.
LaiYHuangJYangM, et al. Seven-day intensive preoperative rehabilitation for elderly patients with lung cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res2017; 209: 30–36.
25.
LaiYSuJQiuP, et al. Systematic short-term pulmonary rehabilitation before lung cancer lobectomy: a randomized trial. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2017; 25: 476–483.
26.
LaiYWangXZhouK, et al. Impact of one-week preoperative physical training on clinical outcomes of surgical lung cancer patients with limited lung function: a randomized trial. Ann Transl Med2019; 7(20): 544.
27.
LickerMKarenovicsWDiaperJ, et al. Short-term preoperative high-intensity interval training in patients awaiting lung cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Oncol2017; 12(2): 323–333.
28.
LiuZQiuTPeiL, et al. Two-week multimodal prehabilitation program improves perioperative functional capability in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg2020; 131(3): 840–849.
29.
MoranoMTAraújoASNascimentoFB, et al. Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation versus chest physical therapy in patients undergoing lung cancer resection: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2013; 94(1): 53–58.
30.
AusaniaFSenraPMeléndezR, et al. Prehabilitation in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Rev Esp Enferm Dig2019; 111(8): 603–608.
31.
DunneDFJackSJonesRP, et al. Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation before planned liver resection. Br J Surg2016; 103(5): 504–512.
32.
MinnellaEMAwasthiRLoiselleSE, et al. Prehabilitation improves functional capacity in esophago-gastric cancer surgery: a randomized control trial. Can J Anesth2018; 65: S91–S92.
33.
ValkenetKTrappenburgJCARuurdaJP, et al. Multicentre randomized clinical trial of inspiratory muscle training versus usual care before surgery for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg2018; 105(5): 502–511.
34.
Van AdrichemEJMeulenbroekRLPlukkerJT, et al. Comparison of two preoperative inspiratory muscle training programs to prevent pulmonary complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy: a randomized controlled pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol2014; 21(7): 2353–2360.
35.
YamanaITakenoSHashimotoT, et al. Randomized controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of a preoperative respiratory rehabilitation program to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. Dig Surg2015; 32(5): 331–337.
36.
BanerjeeSManleyKShawB, et al. Vigorous intensity aerobic interval exercise in bladder cancer patients prior to radical cystectomy: a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Support Care Cancer2018; 26(5): 1515–1523.
37.
BlackwellJEMDolemanBBoereboomCL, et al. High-intensity interval training produces a significant improvement in fitness in less than 31 days before surgery for urological cancer: a randomised control trial. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis2020; 23(4): 696–704.
38.
MinaDSHiltonWJMatthewAG, et al. Prehabilitation for radical prostatectomy: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Surg Oncol2018; 27: 289–298.
39.
MinnellaEMAwasthiRBousquet-DionG, et al. Multimodal prehabilitation to enhance functional capacity following radical cystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol Focus2021; 7(1): 132–138.
40.
HarrisLKSkouSTJuhlCB, et al. Recruitment and retention rates in randomised controlled trials of exercise therapy in people with multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trials2021; 22: 396.
41.
KennedyNNelsonSJeromeRN, et al. Recruitment and retention for chronic pain clinical trials: a narrative review. PAIN Rep2022; 7: e1007.
42.
JacquesRMAhmedRHarperJ, et al. Recruitment, consent and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials published in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Journals Library (1997–2020). BMJ Open2022; 12: e059230.
43.
WaltersSJDos Anjos Henriques-CadbyIBBortolamiO, et al. Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme. BMJ Open2017; 7: e015276.
44.
McBrideKESolomonMJBannonPG, et al. Surgical outcomes for people with serious mental illness are poorer than for other patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med J Aust2021; 214(8): 379–385.
45.
AiyegbusiOLRoydhouseJRiveraSC, et al. Key considerations to reduce or address respondent burden in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection. Nat Commun2022; 13: 6026.
