HarunNGuptaNMcCormackFX, et al. Dynamic use of historical controls in clinical trials for rare disease research: a re-evaluation of the MILES trial. Clin Trials2023.
2.
CarlinBPNollevauxF. Bayesian complex innovative trial designs (CIDs) and their use in drug development for rare disease. J Clin Pharmacol2022; 62(suppl 2): S56–S71.
3.
KidwellKMRoychoudhurySWendelbergerB, et al. Application of Bayesian methods to accelerate rare disease drug development: scopes and hurdles. Orphanet J Rare Dis2022; 17: 186.
4.
GehanEAFreireichEJ. Non-randomized controls in cancer clinical trials. N Engl J Med1974; 290: 198–203.
5.
BlumRLWiederholdG. Inferring knowledge from clinical data banks utilizing techniques from artificial intelligence. In: OrthnerFH (ed.) Symposium on computer applications in medical care. New York: IEEE, 1978, pp. 303–307.
6.
ByarDP. Why data bases should not replace randomized clinical trials. Biometrics1980; 36: 337–342.
7.
PocockSJ. The combination of randomized and historical controls in clinical trials. J Chronic Dis1976; 29(3): 175–188.
8.
FreidlinBKornEL. Augmenting randomized clinical trial data with historical control data: precision medicine applications. JNCI2023; 115: 14–20.
9.
RoigMBKönigFMeyerE, et al. Commentary: two approaches to analyze platform trials incorporating non-concurrent controls with a common assumption. Clin Trials2022; 19(5): 502–503.
PriceDScottJ. The US Food and Drug Administration’s complex innovative trial design pilot meeting program: progress to date. Clin Trials2021; 18: 706–710.
12.
YinPTDesmondJDayJ. Sharing historical trial data to accelerate clinical development. Clin Pharmacol Ther2019; 106(6): 1177–1178.