ParkerRAWeirCJ. Non-adjustment for multiple testing in multi-arm trials of distinct treatments: rationale and justification. Clin Trials2020; in press.
2.
TukeyJW. The problem of multiple comparisons, dittoed manuscript of 396 pages. Princeton, NJ: Department of Statistics, Princeton University, 1953.
International Conference of Harmonisation. Topic E9: statistical principles for clinical trials. 1998, www.ich.org
5.
US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry on multiple endpoints in clinical trials. 2017, www.fda.gov
6.
European Medicines Agency. Guideline on multiplicity issues in clinical trials. 2017, www.ema.europa.eu
7.
International Conference of Harmonisation. Topic E17: general principles for planning and design of multi-regional clinical trials. 2017, www.ich.org
8.
CollignonOGartnerCHaidichAB, et al. Current statistical considerations and regulatory perspectives on the planning of confirmatory basket, umbrella and platform trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther2020; 107(5): 1059–1067.
9.
MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF heart protection study of cholesterol-lowering therapy and of antioxidant vitamin supplementation in a wide range of patients at increased risk of coronary heart disease death: early safety and efficacy experience. Eur Heart J1999; 20(10): 725–741.
10.
LeeI-MCookNRGazianoM, et al. Vitamin E in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer; the women’s health study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA2005; 294: 56–65.
11.
RidkerPMCookNRLeeIM, et al. A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med2005; 352: 1293–1304.
12.
GersteinHCYusufSHolmanR, et al. Rationale, design and recruitment characteristics of a large, simple international trial of diabetes prevention: the DREAM trial. Diabetologia2004; 47(9): 1519–1527.
13.
BretzFMaurerWGalloP. Discussion of ‘Some controversial multiple testing problems in regulatory applications’ by HMJ Hung and S-J Wang. J Biopharm Stat2009; 19(1): 25–34.
14.
KaplanRMaughanTCrookA, et al. Evaluating many treatments and biomarkers in oncology: a new design. J Clin Oncol2013; 31: 4562–4570.
15.
HerbstRSGandaraDRHirschFR, et al. Lung master protocol (Lung-MAP) – a biomarker-driven protocol for accelerating development of therapies for squamous cell lung cancer: SWOG S1400. Clin Cancer Res2015; 21: 1514–1524.
16.
Racine- PoonADAmelioAJr SverdlovO, et al. OPTIM-ARTS – an adaptive phase II open platform trial design with application to a metastatic melanoma study. Stat Biopharm Res. Epub Ahead of Print 13May2020. DOI: 10.1080/19466315.2020.1749722.
17.
MeyerELMesenbrinkPDunger-BaldaufC, et al. The evolution of master protocol clinical trial designs – a systematic literature review. Clin Ther2020; accepted for publication, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.05.010.
18.
StallardNToddSParasharD, et al. On the need to adjust for multiplicity in confirmatory clinical trials with master protocols. Ann Oncol2019; 30(4): 506–509.