KentDMRothwellPMIoannidisJP, et al. Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: a proposal. Trials2010; 11: 85.
2.
LeskoCRHendersonNCVaradhanR. Considerations when assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect in patient-centered outcomes research. J Clin Epidemiol2018; 100: 22–31.
3.
VaradhanRSegalJBBoydCM, et al. A framework for the analysis of heterogeneity of treatment effect in patient-centered outcomes research. J Clin Epidemiol2013; 66(8): 818–825.
GordonSCTrudeauSLiJ, et al. Race, age, and geography impact hepatitis C genotype distribution in the United States. J Clin Gastroenterol2019; 53(1): 40–50.
6.
WhiteIRHortonNJCarpenterJ, et al. Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data. BMJ2011; 342: d40.
7.
BalakrishnanASPalmerNRFergusKB, et al. Minority recruitment trends in phase III prostate cancer clinical trials (2003 to 2014): progress and critical areas for improvement. J Urol2019; 201(2): 259259–259267.
8.
ChinoFZafarSY. Financial toxicity and equitable access to clinical trials. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book2019; 39: 11–18.
9.
CATT Research Group, MartinDFMaguireMG, et al. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med2011; 364: 1897–1908.
10.
WilderJMJeffersLJRavendhranN, et al. Safety and efficacy of ledipasvir–sofosbuvir in black patients with hepatitis C virus infection: a retrospective analysis of phase 3 data. Hepatology2016; 63(2): 437–444.