There are two distinct problems about bystander effects raised by organ donor intervention research. The first is the problem of “bystander organs”—sometimes called “non-target organs”—which Kimmelman discusses in his case presentation. How do we treat the recipients of organs that are not the subject of the intervention research but nonetheless might be directly affected by the research? The second problem is not about altering the organ but the pattern of distribution of organs. Each of these cases shows bystander effects that matter for real people. This article examines how research ethics should approach each of these cases.
Committee on Issues in Organ Donor Intervention Research. Opportunities for organ donor intervention research: saving lives by improving the quality and quantity of organs for transplantation (Consensus Study Report of the National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine) (eds ChildressJFDomnitzSLivermanCT). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
CohenIG. Litigation and the statistical v. identified lives issue: on standing, ripeness, and class actions. In: CohenIGEyalNDanielsN (eds) Identified v. statistical lives: an interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 161–174.
4.
KammFM. Morality, mortality volume 1: death and whom to save from it. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
