KillenJHarringtonMFauciAS. MSM, AIDS research activism, and HAART. Lancet2012; 380: 314–316.
7.
RoseSLHighlandJKarafaMTet al. Patient advocacy organizations, industry funding, and conflicts of interest. JAMA Intern Med2017; 177: 344–350.
8.
SchechterMSGutierrezHH. Improving the quality of care for patients with cystic fibrosis. Curr Opin Pediatr2010; 22: 296–301.
9.
ShermanREDaviesKMRobbMAet al. Accelerating development of scientific evidence for medical products within the existing US regulatory framework. Nat Rev Drug Discov2017; 16: 297–298.
10.
ChouRDeyoRDevineBet al. The effectiveness and risks of long-term opioid treatment of chronic pain. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment 218, 2014. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
11.
Le NouryJNardoJMHealyDet al. Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence. BMJ2015; 351: h4320.
12.
CiprianiAFurukawaTASalantiGet al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet. Epub ahead of print 20February2018. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802.
13.
FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group. BEST (biomarkers, endpoints, and other tools) resource. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration, 2016.
14.
FlemingTRDeMetsDL. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled?Ann Intern Med1996; 125: 605–613.
15.
RamseyBWNepomGTLonialS. Academic, foundation, and industry collaboration in finding new therapies. N Engl J Med2017; 376: 1762–1769.
InselTR. Digital phenotyping: technology for a new science of behavior. JAMA2017; 318: 1215–1216.
18.
ShermanREAndersonSADal PanGJet al. Real-world evidence—what is it and what can it tell us?N Engl J Med2016; 375: 2293–2297.
19.
SheaMOstermannLHohmanRet al. Regulatory watch: impact of breakthrough therapy designation on cancer drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov2016; 15: 152.