University of Pennsylvania ninth annual conference on statistical issues in clinical trials: Where are we with adaptive clinical trial designs? (morning panel discussion)

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bretz

Gallo

Maurer

. Adaptive designs: the Swiss Army knife among clinical trial designs? Clin Trials. Epub ahead of print 22 March 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1740774517699406.

Wathen

Thall

. A simulation study of outcome adaptive randomization in multi-arm clinical trials. Clin Trials. Epub ahead of print 1 February 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1740774517692302.

Wang

Lee

. Simulation study for evaluating the performance of response-adaptive randomization. Contemp Clin Trials 2015; 40: 15–25.

Bowden

Trippa

. Unbiased estimation for response adaptive clinical trials. Stat Methods Med Res. Epub ahead of print 11 August 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0962280215597716.

Parmer

Sydes

Cafferty

et al . Testing many treatments within a single protocol over 10 years at MRC CTU at UCL Multi-arm, multi stage platform, umbrella and basket protocols. Clin Trials, 2017, Vol. 14(5) 451–461 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1740774517725697.

Connor

Broglio

Durkalski

et al . The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial: an adaptive trial design case study. Trials 2015; 16: 72.

Connor

Elm

Broglio

; ESETT and ADAPT-IT Investigators. Bayesian adaptive trials offer advantages in comparative effectiveness trials: an example in status epilepticus. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: S130–S137.

Emanuel

Wendler

Killen

et al . What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. J Infect Dis 2004; 189: 930–937.

Joffe

Ellenberg

. Commentary on Hey and Kimmelman. Clin Trials 2015; 12: 116–118.

10.

Bartlett

Roloff

Cornell

et al . Extracorporeal circulation in neonatal respiratory failure: a prospective randomized study. Pediatrics 1985; 76: 479–487.

11.

Brown

Ten Have

et al . Adaptive designs for randomized trials in public health. Annu Rev Public Health 2009; 30: 1–25.

12.

Zelen

. Play the winner rule and the controlled clinical trial. J Am Stat Assoc 1969; 325: 131–146.

13.

Ware

. Investigating therapies of potentially great benefit: ECMO. Stat Sci 1989; 4: 298–306.

14.

Berry

. Investigating therapies of potentially great benefit: ECMO: comment: ethics and ECMO. Stat Sci 1989; 4: 306–310.

15.

Kalbfleisch

Prentice

. The statistical analysis of failure time data. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2002.

16.

Simon

. Adaptive enrichment designs for clinical trials. Biostatistics 2013; 14: 613–625.

17.

Jennison

Turnbull

. Group sequential methods with applications to clinical trials. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1999.

18.

Karrison

Huo

Chappell

. A group sequential, response-adaptive design for randomized clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 2003; 24: 506–522.

19.

Zang

Lee

. Adaptive clinical trial designs in oncology. Chin Clin Oncol 2014; 3: 49.

20.

Luce

Connor

Broglio

et al . Using Bayesian adaptive trial designs for comparative effectiveness research: a virtual trial execution. Ann Intern Med 2016; 165: 431–438.

21.

Davis

Cutler

Gordon

et al . Rationale and design for the Antihypertensive and Lipid Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). ALLHAT Research Group. Am J Hypertens 1996; 9: 342–360.

22.

ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–2997.

23.

Proschan

Brittain

Kammerman

. Minimize the use of minimization with unequal allocation. Biometrics 2011; 67: 1135–1141.

24.

Weinstein

Dolan

Wright

et al . Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1512–1521.

25.

Uno

Wei

Hughes

. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 680–681.

26.

National Research Council (US) Panel on Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials (eds). The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.