A randomized study of multimedia informational aids for research on medical practices: Implications for informed consent

Abstract

Background/Aims:

Participant understanding is a key element of informed consent for enrollment in research. However, participants often do not understand the nature, risks, benefits, or design of the studies in which they take part. Research on medical practices, which studies standard interventions rather than new treatments, has the potential to be especially confusing to participants because it is embedded within usual clinical care. Our objective in this randomized study was to compare the ability of a range of multimedia informational aids to improve participant understanding in the context of research on medical practices.

Methods:

We administered a web-based survey to members of a proprietary online panel sample selected to match national US demographics. Respondents were randomized to one of five arms: four content-equivalent informational aids (animated videos, slideshows with voice-over, comics, and text) and one no-intervention control. We measured knowledge of research on medical practices using a summary knowledge score from 10 questions based on the content of the informational aids. We used analysis of variance and paired t-tests to compare knowledge scores between arms.

Results:

There were 1500 completed surveys (300 in each arm). Mean knowledge scores were highest for the slideshows with voice-over (65.7%), followed by the animated videos (62.7%), comics (60.7%), text (57.2%), and control (50.3%). Differences between arms were statistically significant except between the slideshows with voice-over and animated videos and between the animated videos and comics. Informational aids that included an audio component (animated videos and slideshows with voice-over) had higher knowledge scores than those without an audio component (64.2% vs 59.0%, p < .0001). There was no difference between informational aids with a character-driven story component (animated videos and comics) and those without.

Conclusion:

Our results show that simple multimedia aids that use a dual-channel approach, such as voice-over with visual reinforcement, can improve participant knowledge more effectively than text alone. However, the relatively low knowledge scores suggest that targeted informational aids may be needed to teach some particularly challenging concepts. Nonetheless, our results demonstrate the potential to improve informed consent for research on medical practices using multimedia aids that include simplified language and visual metaphors.

Keywords

Research on medical practices comparative effectiveness research pragmatic clinical trials multimedia video informed consent research ethics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beauchamp

Childress

. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.

World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, 2008, http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf (accessed 15 January 2016).

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects research, 1979, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html (accessed 15 January 2016).

Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg military tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, vol. 2. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1949, pp. 181–182.

Tait

Voepel-Lewis

. Digital media: a new approach for informed consent? JAMA 2015; 313: 463–464.

Schreiner

. Can we keep it simple? JAMA Pediatri 2013; 167: 603–605.

Cohn

Larson

. Improving participant comprehension in the informed consent process. J Nurs Scholarsh 2007; 39: 273–280.

Sugarman

Lavori

Boeger

. Evaluating the quality of informed consent. Clin Trials 2005; 2: 34–41.

Agre

Campbell

Goldman

. Improving informed consent: the medium is not the message. IRB 2003; 25; S11–S19.

10.

Joffe

Cook

Cleary

. Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2001; 358: 1772–1777.

11.

Sugarman

McCrory

Hubal

. Getting meaningful informed consent from older adults: a structured literature review of empirical research. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46: 517–524.

12.

Falagas

Korbila

Giannopoulou

. Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand? Am J Surg 2009; 198: 420–435.

13.

Jenkins

Fallowfield

. Reasons for accepting or declining to participate in randomized clinical trials for cancer therapy. Br J Cancer 2000; 82: 1783–1788.

14.

Sutherland

Lockwood

Till

. Are we getting informed consent from patients with cancer? J R Soc Med 1990; 83: 439–443.

15.

Wilfond

Magnus

. The potential harms and benefits from research on medical practices. Hastings Cent Rep 2015; 45: 5–6.

16.

Kelley

James

Kraft

. Patient perspectives on the learning health system: the importance of trust and shared decision making. Am J Bioeth 2015; 15: 4–17.

17.

Weinfurt

Bollinger

Brelsford

. Patients’ views concerning research on medical practices: implications for consent. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2016; 7: 76–91.

18.

Nishimura

Carey

Erwin

. Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. BMC Med Ethics 2013; 14: 28.

19.

Flory

Emanuel

. Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research. JAMA 2004; 292: 1593–1601.

20.

Karunaratne

Korenman

Thomas

. Improving communication when seeking informed consent: a randomised controlled study of a computer-based method for providing information to prospective clinical trial participants. Med J Aust 2010; 192: 388–392.

21.

Hutchison

Cowan

McMahon

. A randomised controlled study of an audiovisual patient information intervention on informed consent and recruitment to cancer clinical trials. Br J Cancer 2007; 97: 705–711.

22.

Hoffner

Bauer-Wu

Hitchcock-Bryan

. Entering a clinical trial: is it right for you? A randomized study of the clinical trials video and its impact on the informed consent process. Cancer 2012; 118: 1877–1883.

23.

Cho

Magnus

Constantine

. Attitudes toward risk and informed consent for research on medical practices: a cross-sectional survey. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162: 690–696.

24.

Kraft

Cho

Constantine

. A comparison of institutional review board and patient views on consent for research on medical practices. Clin Trials 2016. Epub ahead of print 1 June 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1740774516648907.

25.

Dillman

Smyth

Christian

. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.

26.

Nunnally

Bernstein

. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994.

27.

Collins

. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res 2003; 12: 229–238.

28.

Nadeau

Niemi

. Educated guesses: the process of answering factual knowledge questions in surveys. Publ Opin Q 1995; 59: 323–346.

29.

Mayer

. Multimedia learning. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

30.

Mayer

Moreno

. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ Psychol 2003; 38: 43–52.

31.

Mayer

Moreno

. Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educ Psychol Rev 2002; 14: 87–99.

32.

Houts

Doak

. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 61: 173–190.

33.

Moreno

Mayer

. Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: the role of modality and contiguity. J Educ Psychol 1999; 91: 358–368.

34.

Plass

Homer

Hayward

. Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations. J Comput High Educ 2009; 21: 31–61.

35.

Shneerson

Windle

Cox

. Innovating information-delivery for potential clinical trials participants. What do patients want from multi-media resources? Patient Educ Couns 2013; 90: 111–117.

36.

Kass

Taylor

Ali

. A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and results. Clin Trials 2015; 12: 54–66.

37.

Henry

Palmer

Palinkas

. Reformed consent: adapting to new media and research participant preferences. IRB 2009; 31: 1–8.

38.

Faden

Beauchamp

. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.

39.

Manson

O’Neill

. Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

40.

Aronson

Marsch

Acosta

. Using findings in multimedia learning to inform technology-based behavioral health interventions. Transl Behav Med 2013; 3: 234–243.

41.

Wieland

Nelson

Palmer

. Evaluation of a tuberculosis education video among immigrants and refugees at an adult education center: a community-based participatory approach. J Health Commun 2013; 18: 343–353.

42.

Afolabi

Bojang

D’Alessandro

. Multimedia informed consent tool for a low literacy African research population: development and pilot-testing. J Clin Res Bioeth 2014; 5: 178.

43.

Harmell

Palmer

Jeste

. Preliminary study of a web-based tool for enhancing the informed consent process in schizophrenia research. Schizophr Res 2012; 141: 247–250.

44.

Dunn

Lindamer

Palmer

. Enhancing comprehension of consent for research in older patients with psychosis: a randomized study of a novel consent procedure. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158: 1911–1913.

45.

Moran

Murphy

Frank

. The ability of narrative communication to address health-related social norms. Int Rev Soc Res 2013; 3: 131–149.

46.

Kreuter

Homes

Alcaraz

. Comparing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income African American women. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 81: S6–S14.

47.

Wise

Han

Shaw

. Effects of using online narrative and didactic information on healthcare participation for breast cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns 2008; 70: 348–356.

48.

Hinyard

Kreuter

. Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: a conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Educ Behav 2007; 34: 777–792.

49.

Murphy

Frank

Chatterjee

. Comparing the relative efficacy of narrative vs nonnarrative health messages in reducing health disparities using a randomized trial. Am J Public Health 2015; 105: 2117–2123.