HawkinsJSEmanuelEJ (eds). Exploitation and developing countries: the ethics of clinical research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.
2.
Corbie-SmithG.The continuing legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: considerations for clinical investigation. Am J Med Sci1999; 317: 5–8.
3.
FadenRRLedererSEMorenoJD.US medical researchers, the Nuremberg Doctors Trial, and the Nuremberg Code: a review of findings of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. JAMA1996; 276: 1667–1671.
4.
Spector-BagdadyKLombardoPA.“Something of an adventure”: postwar NIH research ethos and the Guatemala STD experiments. J Law Med Ethics2013; 41: 697–710.
5.
Office for Human Research Protections. Office of the Secretary: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html (1979, accessed 4 February 2016).
6.
WennbergJGittelsohnA.Variations in medical care among small areas. Sci Am1982; 246: 120–134.
7.
LantosJD.Vindication for SUPPORT. N Engl J Med2015; 373: 1393–1395.
8.
AnnasGJGrodinMA.The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code: human rights in human experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
ChoMKMagnusDConstantineM. Attitudes toward risk and informed consent for research on medical practices: a cross-sectional survey. Ann Intern Med2015; 162: 690–696.
GillespieSHCrookAMMcHughTD. Four-month moxifloxacin-based regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis. N Engl J Med2014; 371: 1577–1587.
13.
MerleCSFieldingKSowOB. A four-month gatifloxacin-containing regimen for treating tuberculosis. N Engl J Med2014; 371: 1588–1598.
14.
JindaniAHarrisonTSNunnAJ. High-dose rifapentine with moxifloxacin for pulmonary tuberculosis. N Engl J Med2014; 371: 1599–1608.
15.
BellanSEPulliamJRPearsonCA. Statistical power and validity of Ebola vaccine trials in Sierra Leone: a simulation study of trial design and analysis. Lancet Infect Dis2015; 15: 703–710.
16.
TroxelABAschDAVolppKG. Statistical issues in pragmatic trials of behavioral economic interventions. Clin Trials, in press.
17.
AysolaJTroxelABAschDA. A randomized controlled trial of opt-in versus opt-out enrollment into a diabetes management intervention. Technical report, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2015.
18.
ConnorJTElmJJBroglioKR; ESETT and ADAPT-IT investigators, Bayesian adaptive trials offer advantages in comparative effectiveness trials: an example in status epilepticus. J Clin Epidemiol2013; 66: S130–S137.
HomeDMPocockSJBeck-NielsenH. Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes (RECORD): a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet2009; 373: 2125–2135.
22.
LiebermanJAStroupTSMcEvoyJP. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med2005; 353: 1209–1223.
23.
EllenbergJHEllenbergSS.Proceedings of the University of Pennsylvania 6th annual conference on statistical issues in clinical trials: dynamic treatment regimes. Clin Trials2014; 11: 391–392.
24.
BasslerDMontoriVMBrielM. Early stopping of randomized clinical trials for overt efficacy is problematic. J Clin Epidemiol2008; 61: 241–246.
25.
BasslerDBrielMMontoriVM. Stopping randomized trials early for benefit and estimation of treatment effects: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. JAMA2010; 303: 1180–1187.
26.
BrielMBasslerDWangAT. The dangers of stopping a trial too early. J Bone Joint Surg Am2012; 94(Suppl. 1): 56–60.