ChalmersTCEckhardtRDReynoldsWE. The treatment of acute infectious hepatitis. Controlled studies of the effects of diet, rest, and physical reconditioning on the acute course of the disease and on the incidence of relapses and residual abnormalities. J Clin Invest1955; 34: 1163–1235.
4.
BunkerJPBarnesBAMostellerF. Costs, risks, and benefits of surgery. New York: Oxford University Press, 1967.
5.
Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. Results in patients with diastolic pressures averaging 115 through 129 mm Hg. JAMA1967; 202: 1028–1034.
6.
LevineMISackettMF. Results of BCG immunization in New York City. Am Rev Tuberc1946; 53: 517–532.
7.
SackettDL. The tactics of performing therapeutic trials. In: HaynesRBSackettDLGuyattGH. (eds) Clinical epidemiology: how to do clinical practice research. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006, p. 86.
8.
The Coronary Drug Project Research Group. Influence of adherence to treatment and response of cholesterol on mortality in the coronary drug project. N Engl J Med1980; 303: 1038–1041.
9.
WalshMSrinathanSKMcAuleyDF. The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index. J Clin Epidemiol2014; 67: 622–628.
10.
CobbLAThomasGIDillardDH. An evaluation of internal-mammary-artery ligation by a double-blind technic. N Engl J Med1959; 260: 1115–1118.
11.
RatcliffJD. New surgery for ailing hearts. Readers’ Digest, July1957, pp. 109–112.
12.
MartiniP. Methodenlehre der Therapeutischen Untersuchung [Methodological principles for therapeutic investigations]. Berlin: Springer, 1932.
13.
NoseworthyJHEbersGCVandervoortMK. The impact of blinding on the results of a randomized, placebo-controlled multiple sclerosis clinical trial. Neurology1994; 44: 16–20; reprinted as a classical article in Neurology 2001; 57(12 Suppl. 5): S31–S35.
14.
SackettDL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 6. Testing for blindness at the end of your trial is a mug’s game. Clin Trials2011; 8: 674–676.
15.
The Canadian Cooperative Study Group. A randomized trial of aspirin and sulfinpyrazone in threatened stroke. N Engl J Med1978; 299: 53–59.
16.
RedmondCKColtonT (eds). Biostatistics in clinical trials. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2001, p. 241.
17.
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med1991; 325: 445–453.
18.
EllenbergSSFlemingTRDeMetsDL. Data monitoring in clinical trials: a practical perspective. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
19.
ClemensFElbourneDDarbyshireJ. Data monitoring in randomized controlled trials: surveys of recent practice and policies. Clin Trials2005; 2: 22–33.
20.
Standing Committee on Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education (SCOPME). Supporting doctors and dentists at work: an enquiry into mentoring. SCOPME report. London: Department of Health, 1998.
StrausSESackettDL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 7. Mentoring: why every clinician-trialist needs to get mentored. Clin Trials2011; 8: 765–767.
23.
StrausSESackettDL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 8. Mentoring—part 2: the structure and function of effective mentoring linkage, resources, and academic opportunities. Clin Trials2012; 9: 128–131.
24.
StrausSESackettDL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 9. Mentoring—part 3: the structure and function of effective mentoring: advice and protection. Clin Trials2012; 9: 272–274.
25.
StrausSESackettDL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 10. Mentoring—part 4: attributes of an effective mentor. Clin Trials2012; 9: 367–369.
26.
SackettDLClinician-trialist rounds: 21. The presenting complaints, diagnoses and treatments of mentorships in trouble—part 1: dysfunctional mentorship meetings. Clin Trials2014; 11: 376–379.
27.
StrausSESackettDL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 22. The presenting complaints, diagnoses, and treatments of mentorships in trouble—part 2: abuses of power. Clin Trials2014; 11: 508–511.