ShrierISteeleRJVerhagenE. Beyond intention to treat: What is the right question?Clin Trials2014; 11: 28–37.
2.
FrangakisCERubinDB. Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics2002; 58: 21–29.
3.
AngristJDImbensGWRubinDB. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J Am Stat Assoc1996; 92: 444–55.
4.
BakerSGLindemanKS. The paired availability design: A proposal for evaluating epidural analgesia during labor. Stat Med1994; 13: 2269–78.
5.
BakerSGLindemanKL. Revisiting a discrepant result: A propensity score analysis, the paired availability design for historical controls, and a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Causal Inference2013; 1(1): 51–82.
6.
BakerSG. Causal inference, probability theory, and graphical insights. Stat Med2013; 32: 4319–30.
7.
BakerSG. Analyzing a randomized cancer prevention trial with a missing binary outcome, an auxiliary variable, and all-or-none compliance. J Am Stat Assoc2000; 95: 43–50.
8.
FrangakisCERubinDB. Addressing complications of intention-to-treat analysis in the combined presence of all-or-none treatment-noncompliance and subsequent missing outcomes. Biometrika1999; 86: 365–79.
9.
BakerSG. Analysis of survival data from a randomized trial with all-or-none compliance: Estimating the cost-effectiveness of a cancer screening program. J Am Stat Assoc1998; 93: 929–34.
10.
BakerSGFrangakisCLindemanKS. Estimating efficacy in a proposed randomized trial with initial and later noncompliance. J Roy Stat Soc C: App2007; 56: 211–21.
