Background
Most of the current designs used for Phase I dose finding trials in oncology
will either involve only a single cytotoxic agent or will impose some implicit
ordering among the doses. The goal of the studies is to estimate the maximum
tolerated dose (MTD), the highest dose that can be administered with an acceptable
level of toxicity. A key working assumption of these methods is the monotonicity of
the dose–toxicity curve.
Purpose
Here we consider situations in which the monotonicity assumption may fail.
These studies are becoming increasingly common in practice, most notably, in phase I
trials that involve combinations of agents. Our focus is on studies where there exist
pairs of treatment combinations for which the ordering of the probabilities of a
dose-limiting toxicity cannot be known a priori.
Methods
We describe a new dose-finding design which can be used for multiple-drug
trials and can be applied to this kind of problem. Our methods proceed by laying out
all possible orderings of toxicity probabilities that are consistent with the known
orderings among treatment combinations and allowing the continual reassessment method
(CRM) to provide efficient estimates of the MTD within these orders. The design can
be seen to simplify to the CRM when the full ordering is known.
Results
We study the properties of the design via simulations that provide
comparisons to the Bayesian approach to partial orders (POCRM) of Wages, Conaway, and
O'Quigley. The POCRM was shown to perform well when compared to other suggested
methods for partial orders. Therefore, we comapre our approach to it in order to
assess the performance of the new design.
Limitations
A limitation concerns the number of possible orders. There are dose-finding
studies with combinations of agents that can lead to a large number of possible
orders. In this case, it may not be feasible to work with all possible orders.
Conclusions
The proposed design demonstrates the ability to effectively estimate MTD
combinations in partially ordered dosefinding studies. Because it relaxes the
monotonicity assumption, it can be considered a multivariate generalization of the
CRM. Hence, it can serve as a link between single and multiple-agent dosefinding
trials.