Background
In a pharmaceutical drug development setting, possible interactions between
the treatment and particular baseline clinical or demographic factors are often of
interest. However, the subgroup analysis required to investigate such associations
remains controversial. Concerns with classical hypothesis testing approaches to the
problem include low power, multiple testing, and the possibility of data
dredging.
Purpose
As an alternative to hypothesis testing, the use of shrinkage estimation
techniques is investigated in the context of an exploratory post hoc
subgroup analysis. A range of models that have been suggested in the literature are
reviewed. Building on this, we explore a general modeling strategy, considering
various options for shrinkage of effect estimates. This is applied to a case-study,
in which evidence was available from seven-phase II–III clinical trials examining a
novel therapy, and also to two artificial datasets with the same structure.
Methods
Emphasis is placed on hierarchical modeling techniques, adopted within a
Bayesian framework using freely available software. A range of possible subgroup
model structures are applied, each incorporating shrinkage estimation techniques.
Results
The investigation of the case-study showed little evidence of subgroup
effects. Because inferences appeared to be consistent across a range of
well-supported models, and model diagnostic checks showed no obvious problems, it
seemed this conclusion was robust. It is reassuring that the structured shrinkage
techniques appeared to work well in a situation where deeper inspection of the data
suggested little evidence of subgroup effects.
Limitations
The post hoc examination of subgroups should be seen as an
exploratory analysis, used to help make better informed decisions regarding potential
future studies examining specific subgroups. To a certain extent, the degree of
understanding provided by such assessments will be limited by the quality and
quantity of available data.
Conclusions
In light of recent interest by health authorities into the use of subgroup
analysis in the context of drug development, it appears that Bayesian approaches
involving shrinkage techniques could play an important role in this area. Hopefully,
the developments outlined here provide useful methodology for tackling such a
problem, in-turn leading to better informed decisions regarding subgroups.