Authors' response to V Johnson and Y Yuan

Rothstein HR , Sutton AJ , Borenstein M eds. Publication bias in meta-analysis: prevention, assessment, and adjustments. Sussex: Wiley, 2005.

Ioannidis Jpa , Trikalinos TA The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses. Can Med Assoc J 2007; 176: 1091—6.

Kavvoura FK , Liberopoulos G. , Ioannidis Jpa. Selection in reported epidemiological risks: an empirical assessment. PLoS Med 2007; 4: e74.

Chan AW , Altman DG Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomized trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors. BMJ 2005; 330: 753.

Chan AW , Hrobjartsson A. , Haahr MT , Gotzsche PC , Altman DG Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 2004; 291: 2457—65.

Ioannidis Jpa , Trikalinos TA , Zintzaras E. Extreme between-study homogeneity in meta-analysis may offer useful insights. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 1023—32.

Ioannidis Jpa , Trikalinos TA Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: the Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 543—9.

Goodman SN Towards evidence-based medical statistics. II: the Bayes factor. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 1005—33.

Sterne JA , Davey Smith G. Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests. BMJ 2001; 322: 226-31.

Ioannidis Jpa. Why most published research findings are false . PLoS Med 2005; 2: e124.

Goodman SN , Greenland S. Assessing the reliability of the medical literature. A response to “Why most published research findings are false”. Berkeley Electronic Press, 2007, paper 135. Available at http://www.bepress.com/jhubiostat/paper135