Abstract
By means of the retrospective study of the clinical records of 158 women followed for breast cancer, we aimed to evaluate the consequences of a non-systematic indication for bone scan (BS) based either on CA 15-3 levels alone or a combination of tumor marker levels and clinical criteria. With the first option, the negative predictive value was 95% and 82% of the BS would have been avoided. With the second option, the negative predictive value was 97% and 59% of the BS would have been avoided. Furthermore, the preliminary results of a longitudinal study showed that those patients with normal CA 15-3 levels and positive bone scans showed a subsequent rise in CA 15-3 levels which frequently became elevated with an average delay of 15 months. Omission of systematic bone scans in the follow-up of breast cancer patients is likely to lead to a delay in the diagnosis of bone metastasis in 3% to 5%, the consequences of which have to be examined carefully.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.